Constitutionalism: issues of legal thought

Автор(и)

  • Dmytro Byelov Doctor of Laws, Professor, Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law and Comparative Law, Uzhgorod National University, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine, Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-9488
  • Miroslava Bielova Doctor of Laws, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional Law and Comparative Law, Law Faculty, Uzhgorod National University, Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-2342

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/2734-8873.2024.2.1

Ключові слова:

paradigm, modern Ukrainian constitutionalism, constitutional order, constitution, transformation of the constitution, constitutional legislation, constitutional and legal reform, public authority, constitutional transit, constitutional model of power

Анотація

It is noted that establishing criteria for evaluating legal concepts remains one of the unresolved problems in law. Their interpretation often depends more on the subjective view of the legislator or scholar than on legal logic. At the same time, even the most detailed definition cannot encompass the full diversity of legal relations and be universally applicable. Therefore, formulating precise concepts in constitutional law is complicated by the fact that the theory and practice of national and international constitutionalism are still developing, and their terminological apparatus is still forming.

It is pointed out that the concept of “constitutionalism” has become firmly established in modern scientific discourse. Although the term has humanitarian origins, today it finds application in the natural sciences as well. However, “constitutionalism” is most often used in the humanities, especially in jurisprudence.

It is emphasized that most modern states have constitutions that define their structure and procedures for managing various spheres of life. However, the presence of a constitution is not a sufficient condition for recognizing a state as constitutional. The constitutionality of a state is not limited to the existence of a basic law, which may reflect a certain compromise of socio-political forces and establish the state structure and powers of authorities. Even if this law has supremacy over other laws and can be changed only by a special procedure, this does not guarantee true constitutionalism. Thus, a state can have a constitution but not have constitutionalism, and vice versa. The  authors  conclude  that  despite  the  diversity  of  models  of constitutionalism, common principles can be identified that characterize it as a legal concept:

  1. The supremacy of legal laws, particularly the constitution as the fundamental law;
  2. Legal protection of individual rights and freedoms;
  3. Institutional and legal organization of state power with horizontal and vertical distribution.

It is important to note that the universality of these principles is associated with the transformation of Western society from a religious worldview to a rational perception of the world. This change influenced the ideas about the state and society, contributed to the formation of classical liberal civil society and the concept of an autonomous individual.

Посилання

Bielov D.M. (2011) Paradyhma ukrainskoho konstytutsionalizmu. V.Bereznyi: RK «Yevrostandart». 400 s. [in Ukrainian].

Bielov D.M. (2011) Konstytutsiinyi lad, yak osnovnyi element konstytutsionalizmu. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pravo». Vypusk 17. S. 24–28. [in Ukrainian].

Skakun O.F. (2001) Teoriia derzhavy i prava: Pidruchnyk. Kharkiv: Konsum. 656 s. [in Ukrainian].

Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava (2002) / M.V. Tsvik, V.D. Tkachenko, L.L. Bohachova ta in.; Za red. M.V. Tsvika, V.D. Tkachenka, O.V. Petryshyna. Kharkiv: Pravo. 432 s. [in Ukrainian].

Radchenko O.I. (2010) Kontseptsiia konstytutsiinoi derzhavy: istoryko-pravovyi vymir. Pravo i bezpeka. Naukovyi zhurnal. (37). № 5. S. 45–49. [in Ukrainian].

Bielov D.M. (2012) Reformuvannia konstytutsiinoho ladu: pozytyvy ta nehatyvy. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. № 1. S. 101–105. [in Ukrainian].

Slovska, I.Ye. (2004) Ukrainskyi konstytutsionalizm: etapy stanovlennia i rozvytku. Dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. yuryd. nauk spets. : 12.00.02 – «konstytutsiine pravo». K., 211 s. [in Ukrainian].

Veber M. (1993) Ideia sotsializma. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoi antropologii. Tom II, № 3. S. 22–25. [in Russian].

Medushevskii A.N.(1997) Demokratiiaiavtoritarizm: konstitutsionalizm v sravnitelnoi perspektive. 650 s. [in Russian].

Medushevskii A.N. (2005) Teoriia konstitutsionnykh tsiklov. M. 231 s. [in Russian].

Istoriia konstitutsionalizma XVII-XVIII vv. (1983). 441 s. [in Russian].

Byelov D.M. (2012) Paradyhma konstytutsionalizmu: teoretychni pytannia. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pravo». Vypusk 18. S. 57–60. [in Ukrainian].

Byelov D.M. Paradyhma ukrainskoho konstytutsionalizmu: pravova sutnist ta zmist. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Yurydychni nauky». 2012. № 4 (Chastyna I). S. 32–35. [in Ukrainian].

Stetsiuk P. Pro dyfiniitsiiu katehorii «konstytutsionalizm». Visnyk Lviv. Un-tu. Seriia yurydychna. 2004. Vyp. 39. S. 171–180. [in Ukrainian].

Jean-Louis Quermonne. Les vegimes politiques occidentaux. Ed. Du Seuil. 1986 r. [in Franch].

Konstan B. Ob uzurpatsii. O svobode. Antologiia zapadno-evropeiskoi klassicheskoi liberalnoi mysli. 1995. S. 197–248. [in Russian].

Eidelberg P. The philosophy of the American constitution: A reinterpretation of the intentions of the founding fathers. Lanham (N. Y.), 1985. [in English].

Butko I.P. Osnovnyi Zakon SRSR. Antolohiia ukrainskoi yurydychnoi dumky. V 10 t. / Redkol.: Yu.Shemshuchenko (holova ta in.). Tom 9.: Yurydychna nauka radianskoi doby. K.: «Yurydychna knyha». 2004. 848 s. [in Ukrainian].

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2024-08-10