Socio-economic status and antisocial behavior of children and teenagers.

S. A. Schudro

Abstract


National Insti­tute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and a number of conducted aim analyses, confirmed the presence of intercommunications between socio-economic status of children and teenagers and their antisocial behavior and distinguished the role of such factors, as their psychological features, age and sex. The clinical and psychological inspection of teenagers enabled to distinguishin them such types of personality forming as: aggressive, labial states, instable, with "absence of brake", sexually-fixed, hysteroid, apathetical, schizoid, paranoidal. Processes of socialization, absence or presence of paternal attention to education, capacity for co-operation between parents and teenagers, depression in a mother or father, genetic and phenotype (external) factors cause antisocial behavior of teenagers. It is shown, that genetic factors that affect antisocial behavior of teenagers were more expressive in rich families, while phenotype (external) – in poor families. A review of undertaken studies showed, that there is the necessity of deep research of interaction of social and biological factors for understanding of the role of socio-economic factors in forming of antisocial behavior of children and teenagers.


Keywords


children; teenagers; antisocial behavior; socio-economic status; psychological features; review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arshava IF. [Emotional resilience of man and his diagnosis: Author. Dis. on competition of Doctor degree sciences. Psycho. Sciences specials. 19.00.02 "Psycho­physiology"]. Kyiv, 2007;38. Ukrainian.

Bardenshtein LM, Mozgginskiy YB. [Patholo­gical aggression teens]. M: Medpraktica, 2005;260. Russian.

Datzenko IB. [Personality characteristics of ado­lescents with brain dysfunction]. Med. psychologiya. 2008;2:18–3. Russian.

Kozidubova BM. [The results of the study of psychological characteristics in age aspect]. Med. psy­chologiya. 2008;2:35–8. Russian.

Guryeva VA, Dmitriyeva TB, Makushkin EV. [Cli­nical and forensic adolescent psychiatry a]. Мoskva: МIА, 2007;488. Russian.

Lebedinskaya КС, Lebedinskiy VV. [Mental de­ve­lopment in childhood and adolescence: A manual for schools]. Мoskva: Academicheskiy proekt; Triksta, 2011;303. Russian.

Lichko AE, Ivanov MY. [Pathological-charac­teristic diagnostic questionnaire for adolescents and ex­perience of its practical application]. Moskva: Folium, 1995;64. Russian.

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Dia­gnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-5 (5th ed.).Washington,DC: American Psychiatric As­sociation. Available from: https://www.psychiatry.org/­psychiatrists/.../dsm

Antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Recognition, intervention and management. NICE clinical guideline. NICE; 2013. Available from: https://maps.google.com.ua/maps?q=na­tional+institute

Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology. 2002;53:371–99. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233

Burt SA, Neiderhiser JM. Aggressive versus nonaggressive antisocial behavior: Distinctive etiological moderation by age developmental. Psychology. 2009;45(4):1164–76. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1037/a0016130.

Violato M, Petrou S, Gray R, Redshaw M. Fa­mily income and child cognitive and behavioural deve­lopment in theUnited Kingdom: Does money matter? Health Economics. 2011;20(10):1201–25.

Odgers C, Moffitt T, Broadbent J. et al. Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology. 2008;20(2):673–716. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1017/s0954579408000333.

Goozen SH, Calder AJ, Goodyer ІМ. Research review: Evaluating and reformulating the developmental taxonomic theory of antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2013;54 (9);924–40.

Henninger W, Luze G. Moderating effects of gen­der on the relationship between poverty and children's externalizing behaviors. Journal of Child Health Care. 2013;17(1):72–81.

Koenen K, Uddin M, Amstadter A, Galea S. In­corporating the social environment in genotype environment interaction studies of mental disorders. / In­ternational Journal of Clinical Practice. 2010;64(11):1489–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02359.x.

Petersen IT, Bates JE, D'Onofrio BM, et al. Language ability predicts the development of behavior problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2013;122(2):542-57. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1037/a0031963.

Amone-P'Olak K, Burger H, Huisman M et al. Pa­rental psychopathology and socioeconomic position predict adolescent offspring's mental health independently and do not interact: The TRAILS study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2011;65(1):57–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.092569.

Rhee SH, Waldman ID. Genetic and environ­mental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin. 2002;128(3):490–29. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490.

Piotrowska P, Stride C, Croft S, Rowe R. So­cioeconomic status and antisocial behaviour among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2015;35:47–55. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/­article/pii/S0272735814001652

Åslund C, Comasco E, Nordquist N, et al. Self­reported family socioeconomic status, the 5‐HTTLPR genotype, and delinquent behavior in a com­muni­ty‐based adolescent population. Aggressive Behavior. 2013;39(1):52–63.

Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE. Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic-status and child conduct problems. Child Development. 1994;65(2):649-65. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00774.x.

Letourneau N, Duffet-Leger L, Levac L, et al. Socioeconomic status and child development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2013;21(3):211–224. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1177/1063426611421007.

Stone S, Speltz M, Collett B, Werler M. Socio­economic factors in relation to discrepancy in parent versus teacher ratings of child behavior. Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2013;35(3):314–20.

Veenstra R, Lindenberg S, Oldehinkel A, et. al. Temperament, environment, and antisocial behavior in a population sample of preadolescent boys and girls. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2006;30(5):422–32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1177/0165025406071490.

Tuvblad C, Grann M, Lichtenstein P. Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socio­economic status: Gene-environment interaction. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006;47(7):734–43. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01552.x.


GOST Style Citations


  1. Аршава І.Ф. Емоційна стійкість людини та її діагностика: автореф. дис. на здобуття наук. ступеня д-ра психол. наук: спец. 19.00.02 «Психофізіологія» / І. Ф. Аршава. – Київ, 2007. – 38 с.
  2. Барденштейн Л.М. Патологическая агрессия подростков / Л.М. Барденштейн, Ю. Б. Можгинский. – Москва: Медпрактика, 2005. – 260 с.
  3. Даценко И.Б. Личностные особенности под­ростков с мозговой дисфункцией / И.Б. Даценко // Мед. психология. – 2008. – № 2. – С. 18–23.
  4. Козидубова В.М. Результаты изучения пси­хологических особенностей в возрастном аспекте / В.М. Козидубова // Мед. психология. – 2008. – № 2. – С. 35–38.
  5. Клиническая и судебная подростковая пси­хиатрия / В.А. Гурьева, Т.Б. Дмитриева, Е.В. Ма­куш­кин [и др.]; под ред. В. А. Гурьевой. – Москва: МИА, 2007. – 488 с.
  6. Лебединская К.С. Нарушение психического раз­вития в детском и подростковом возрасте: Учебное пособие для вузов / К.С. Лебединская, В.В. Лебе­динский. – Москва: Академический проект; Трикста, 2011. – 303 с.
  7. Личко А.Е. Патохарактерологический диагно­стический опросник для подростков и опыт его практического применения / А.Е. Личко, М.Я. Ива­нов. – Москва: Фолиум, 1995.  – 64 с.
  8. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diag­nostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-5 (5th ed.).Washington,DC: American Psychiatric As­so­ciation. Режим доступу: https://www.psychiatry.org/psy­chiatrists/.../dsm
  9. Antisocial behavior and conduct disorders in children and young people: Recognition, intervention and management. NICE clinical guideline [Електронний ресурс] / National Institute for Health and Care Excel­lence, 2013. Режим доступу: https://maps.goog­le.com.ua/maps?q=national+institute
  10. Bradley R. H. Socioeconomic status and child development [Електронний ресурс] / R.H. Bradley, R.F.Corwyn // Ann. Review Psychology. – 2002. – Vol. 53. – P. 371–399. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/an­nurev.psych.53.100901.135233
  11.  Burt S.A. Aggressive versus nonaggressive an­tisocial behavior: Distinctive etiological moderation by age developmental [Електронний ресурс] / S.F. Burt, J.M. Neiderhiser // Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 45, N 4. – P. 1164–1176. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/­a0016130.
  12.  Family income and child cognitive and behavioural development in the United Kingdom: Does money matter? / M. Violato, S. Petrou, R. Gray, M. Red­shaw // Health Economics. – 2011. – Vol. 20, N 10. – P. 1201-1225.
  13. Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes [Електронний ре­сурс] / C. Odgers, T. Moffitt, J. Broadbent [et al.] // Development and Psychopathology. – 2008. – Vol. 20 N 2. – P. 673–716. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/­10.1017/ s0954579408000333.
  14.  Goozen S. H. Research review: Evaluating and reformulating the developmental taxonomic theory of antisocial behavior / S.H. Goozen, A.J. Calder, І.М. Goodyer // J. Child. Psychology Psychiatry. – 2013. – Vol. 54, N 9. – P. 924-940.
  15. Henninger W. Moderating effects of gender on the relationship between poverty and children's ex­ternalizing behaviors / W. Henninger, G. Luze // J. Child. Health. Care. – 2013. – Vol. 17, N 1. – P. 72-81.
  16. Incorporating the social environment in genotype environment interaction studies of mental disorders [Електронний ресурс] / K. Koenen, M. Uddin, A. Am­stadter, S. Galea // Inter. J. Clin. Practice. – 2010. – Vol. 64, N 11. – P. 1489–1492. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02359.x.
  17. Language ability predicts the development of behavior problems in children [Електронний ресурс] / I.T. Petersen, J.E. Bates, B.M. D'Onofrio [et al.] // Journal of Abnormal Psychology. – 2013. – Vol. 122, N 2. – P. 542-557. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/­a0031963.
  18.  Parental psychopathology and socioeconomic position predict adolescent offspring's mental health independently and do not interact: The TRAILS study [Електронний ресурс] / K. Amone-P'Olak, H. Burger, M. Huisman [et al.] // J. Epidemiol. Community Health. – 2011. – Vol. 65, N 1. – P. 57-63. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.092569.
  19. Rhee S. H. Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies [Електронний ресурс] / S.H. Rhee, I.D. Wal­dman // Psychological Bulletin. – 2002. – Vol. 128, N3. – P. 490-529. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490.
  20. Socioeconomic status and antisocial behaviour among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Електронний ресурс] P.J. Piotrowska, C. Stri­de, S. Croft, R. Rowe / Clinical Psychology Re­view – 2015.– Vol.35.–P.47-55. Режим доступу: http://www.scien­cedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735814001652
  21. Selfreported family socioeconomic status, the 5‐HTTLPR genotype, and delinquent behavior in a com­munity‐based adolescent population / C. Åslund, E. Co­masco, N. Nordquist [et al.] // Aggressive Behavior. – 2013. – Vol. 39, N 1. – P. 52-63.
  22.  Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic-status and child conduct problems [Електронний ресурс] / K.A. Dodge, G.S. Pettit, J.E. Ba­tes // Child. Development. – 1994. – Vol. 65, N 2. – P. 649-665. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/­j.1467-8624.1994.tb00774.x.
  23. Socioeconomic status and child development: A meta-analysis [Електронний ресурс] / N. Letourneau, L. Duffet-Leger, L. Levac [et al.] // J. Emotional Behavioral Disorders. – 2013. – Vol. 21, N 3. – P. 211-224. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/­1063426611421007.
  24. Socioeconomic factors in relation to discrepancy in parent versus teacher ratings of child behavior / S. Stone, M. Speltz, B. Collett, M. Werler // Psycho­pa­thol. Behavioral Assessment. – 2013. – Vol. 35, N 3. – P. 314-320.
  25.  Temperament, environment, and antisocial behavior in a population sample of preadolescent boys and girls [Електронний ресурс] / R. Veenstra, S. Linden­berg, A. Oldehinkel [et. al.] // Inter. J. Behavioral De­velopment.  – 2006. –Vol. 30, N 5. – P. 422-432. Режим доступу: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071490.
  26.  Tuvblad C. Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: Gene–envi­ronment interaction [Електронний ресурс] / C. Tuvblad, M. Grann, P. Lichtenstein // J. Child. Psychology Psychiatry. – 2006. – Vol. 47, N 7. – P. 734-743. Режим доступу: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01552.x.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2017.1.101439

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.