Prevention of complications after surgical treatment of colpocystocele.

R. M. Banakhevych, К. В. Akimova, K. O. Pariienko

Abstract


78 women with the diagnosis of cystocele were examined. The average age of the examined women was 61.5±9.3 years, the age of women in the control group was 56.7±1.8 years (p>0.05). The results of postoperative treatment in postmenopausal women are evaluated. After the treatment on the day 33 after the ope­ration, the cytological aspirate from the vaginal cavity testified to the completion of the healing process of the vaginal wall surface in the physiological regime in 93.8% of the women in the main group and in 63.3% of the women in the comparison group. Inflammatory type of smear is established in 5.8% of women in the main group and in 32.0% of wo­men in the comparison group (p<0.05). Development of purulent process in the surgical intervention zone was observed in 1 (2.1%) patients of the main group and in 3 (10.0%) patients in the comparison group (p<0.05). The activation of reparative processes was observed against the background of treatment with preparations containing promestriene.


Keywords


cystocele; surgery; complications; prophylaxis; rehabilitation

References


Antomonov MY. [Mathematical processing and analysis of biomedical data]. Kiyv. 2006;558. Ukrainian.

BoldyrevaMN. [«Femoflor» research of bioeno­sis of the urogenital tract in women of reproductive age by PCR method with real-time results detection: metho­dical manual for physicians]. Moskva. 2010;12. Russian.

Kupert MA, Solodun PV, Kupert AF. [Endomet­ritis after childbirth (at-risk groups, clinical features and diagnostics]. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2003;4:42-46. Russian.

Banakhevych RM, Akimova KB, Voronіn KV, et al. [Incontinence of urine in women with recurrence of genital prolapse] Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vest­nik. 2012;15(2)1(58):18-21. Ukrainian.

Bejenar VF, Bogatyryova EV, Culadze LK, Ci­purdeeva AA. [Complications of surgical treatment of pro­lapse of pelvic organs using the system PROLIFT]. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney. 2009;58(5):М25–М26. Russian.

Popov AA,MananikovaTN, Shaginyan GG, et al. [Application of minimaly invasive technologies in the treatment of the complicated forms of prolapse of ge­nitalia]. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2004;3:32-34. Russian.

Popov AA, et al. [The modern approach to the correction of rectocele in gynecological patients with genital prolapse]. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera–gine­kologa. 2006;6(2):38-40. Russian.

Bachaev VV, Gorin VE, Gunter VE, et al. [Func­tional violations in the expressed displays of prolapse of genitalia]. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney. 2009;58(5):М17–М18. Russian.

Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ, et al. [Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population–based cohort study]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664.

Jeon MJ, Chung SM, Jung HJ. [Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse].Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;6(4):268-73.

MedinaCA, Candiotti K, Takacs P. [Wide genital hiatus is a risk factor for recurrence following anterior vaginal repair]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;101(2):184-7.

Halina M, Zyczynski MD, Marcus P, et al. [One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with no­nanchored mesh and vaginal support device]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;43(3):101-8.

Digesu GA, et al. [The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life]. BJOG. 2005;112:971-6.


GOST Style Citations


  1. Антомонов М.Ю. Математическая обработка и анализ медико-биологических данных / М.Ю. Анто­монов. – Киев: Изд-во „Малий друк”, 2006. – 558 с.
  2. Болдырева М.Н. "Фемофлор" исследование биоценоза урогенитального тракта у женщин репро­дуктивного возраста методом ПЦР с детекцией ре­зуль­татов в режиме реального времени: метод. посо­бие для врачей / М.Н. Болдырева. – Москва, 2010. – 12 с.
  3. Куперт М.А. Эндометрит после родов (группы риска, особенности клиники и диагностики) / М.А. Куперт, П.В. Солодун, А.Ф. Куперт //Рос. вестник акушера–гинеколога. – 2003. – № 4. – С. 42-46.
  4. Нетримання сечі у жінок з рецидивом гені­тального пролапсу / Р.М. Банахевич, К.Б. Акимова, К.В. Воронін [та ін.] // Таврич. мед.-биол. вестник. – 2012. – Т. 15, № 2, ч. 1 (58). – С. 18-21.
  5. Осложнения, возникающие при хирургичес­ком лечении пролапса тазовых органов с использо­ванием системы PROLIFT / В.Ф. Беженарь, Е.В. Бо­га­тырева, Л.К. Цуладзе, А.А. Цыпурдеева // Журнал аку­шерства и женских болезней. – 2009. – Т. 58, № 5. – С. М25-М26.
  6. Применение малоинвазивных технологий в ле­чении осложненных форм пролапса гениталий / А.А. По­пов, Т.Н. Мананникова, Г.Г. Шагинян [и др.] // Аку­шерство и гинекология. – 2004. – № 3. – С. 32-34.
  7. Современный подход к коррекции ректоцеле у гинекологических больных с пролапсом гениталий / А.А. Попов [и др.] / Рос. вестник акушера–гинеколога. – 2006. – Т. 6, № 2. – С. 38-40.
  8. Функциональные нарушения при выраженных проявлениях пролапса гениталий / В.В. Бахаев, В.Э. Горин, В.Э. Гюнтер [и др.] // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2009. – Т. 58, № 5. – С. М17-М18.
  9. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hyste­rec­tomy: A population–based cohort study / R.E. Blandon, A.E. Bharucha, L.J. Melton [et al.] // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2007. – Vol. 197, N 6. – P. 664.
  10. Jeon M.J. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse / M.J. Jeon, S.M. Chung, H.J. Jung // Gy­ne­col. Obstet. Invest. – 2008. – Vol. 6, N 66 (4). – P. 268-273.
  11. Medina C.A. Wide genital hiatus is a risk factor for recurrence following anterior vaginal repair / C.A. Medina, K. Candiotti, P. Takacs // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. – 2008. – Vol. 101, N 2. – P. 184-187.
  12. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device / M. Halina, M.D. Zyczynski, P. Marcus [et al.] Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010. – Vol. 43, N 3. – Р. 101-108.
  13. The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life / G.A. Digesu [et al.] // BJOG. – 2005. – Vol. 112. – P. 971-976. 




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2018.2.133944

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.