Results of stress-strain states study in prosthetics of different types of atrophy of edentulous mandible

Authors

  • O.O. Fastovets SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine» Department of Prosthetic Dentistry V. Vernadsky str., 9, Dnipro, 49044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-3244
  • S.O. Sapalov Zaporizhzhya State Medical University * Department of Propaedeutic and Surgical Dentistry Mayakovsky Ave. 26, Zaporizhzhya, 69063, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9536-2367
  • V.O. Shtepa SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine» Department of Prosthetic Dentistry V. Vernadsky str., 9, Dnipro, 49044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6407-7507

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2020.4.221411

Keywords:

complete adentia, mandible, complete dentures, dental implantation, finite element analysis

Abstract

Complete dentures remain still popular due to the economic component of such prosthetic treatment. However, additional fixation on intraosseous implants provides a greater clinical and functional effectiveness and a greater level of satisfaction with the results of prosthetics in edentulous patients. At the moment, the biomechanical aspects of complete denture prosthetics and prosthetics with fixation on implants, taking into account the degree of atrophy of the edentulous jaws, are not complete understood. Such studies make it possible to create recommendations on the choice of prosthetic tactics for edentulous patients. The aim of the research was to study the distribution of stress-strain states in prosthetics of the edentulous mandible with complete dentures and with designs supported on intraosseous implants, taking into account the type of atrophy. It was carried out computer simulation of 8 virtual finite element models of mandible with different types of atrophy. According to Keller they were 4 models: of the biomechanical system simulation "complete denture – mandible" and 4 ones – "denture – intraosseous implants – mandible". In each of the models, a chewing load of 100 N was simulated (symmetrically and asymmetrically). The ANSIS 12.1 finite element analysis was used to calculate the stress-strain states in the described calculation systems. It was estimated the distribution of stresses in cortical bone and displacements of the dentures on the prosthetic bed. Under using complete dentures, the maximum stresses in the bone tissue of the prosthetic bed were observed for the third type of mandible atrophy with all types of power load, the smallest ones – for the fourth type. Additional fixation of removable dentures in simulation models of biomechanical systems “denture – intraosseous implants – mandible” lead to a significant increase in stresses in the alveolar bone. The maximum stresses were observed in the area of the marginal bone, while their greatest values were in the well-expressed alveolar part of the mandible for first and third types by Keller. The movements of bases of complete dentures were insignificant and fluctuated within hundredths of a millimeter for all types of atrophy. The use of intraosseous implants for fixation of dentures caused increase in movements by several times. Besides, displacement fields were characteristic: they were uniform for complete dentures but in the use of implants – not. The expressed alveolar process in the first and third types of atrophy of the edentulous mandible caused an increase in the displacements of the distal sections of the dentures on both sides with a symmetrical force load and on one side – with an asymmetric one. It can be assumed that such a distribution of stress-strain states accelerates atrophy of prosthetic bed tissues. As a result of prosthetics of complete defects of lower dentitions, both with traditional complete dentures and with additional support on implants, different distribution of stress-strain states occurs in different phases of the chewing act in the bone of the prosthetic bed, the character of which is determined by the shape of the alveolar part described by Keller's classification. The results allow us to develop an algorithm for determining the kind of prosthetics for edentulous patients, depending on the type of mandible atrophy.

References

Novozemtseva TN, Remizova AA, Uzunyan NA, Shumakov VG, Simakova TG, Pozharitskaya MM. [Pos­sibilities of intraosseous implantation to improve fixation of dentures with full adentia]. Rossiyskiy sto­matologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016;20(5):257-9. Russian.

Kalamkarov A. [Study of the dynamics of bone atrophy in orthopedic treatment of patients with complete tooth loss using dental intraosseous implants]. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2015;6:10-12. Russian.

Malanchuk VA, Kryshchuk MH, Kopchak AV. [Simulation computer modeling in maxillofacial surgery]. Kyiv: Askania Publishing House; 2013. p. 231. Ukrainian.

Nespryadko VP, Kuts PV. [Dental implantology. Fundamentals of theory and practice]. Summit Book; 2016. p. 348. Russian.

Fastovets OO, Kryzhanovsky AY. [Study of stress-strain states of prosthetic bed tissues under complete denture prosthetics]. Klinichna stomatolohiya. 2014;1:57-60. Ukrainian.

Fastovets OO, Sapalov SO. [Comparative clinical and functional evaluation of the prosthetic efficiency complete dentures and removable dentures with support on implants in edentulous patients]. Visnyk sto­ma­tolohiyi. 2019;31(1):64-68. Ukrainian.

Khuder T, Yunus N, Sulaiman E, Ibrahim N, Khalid T, Masood M. Association between occlusal force distribution in implant overdenture prostheses and residual ridge resorption. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2017;44(5):398-404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12504

Bedrossian E, Bedrossian EA. Treatment plan­ning the edentulous mandible. Review of biomechanical and clinical considerations: an update. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants; 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7196

Driscoll CF, Golden WG. Treating the Complete Denture Patient. 1st ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2020. p. 312. doi: //doi.org/10.25241/stomaeduj.2020.7(1).bookreview.1

de la Rosa Castolo G, Guevara Perez SV, Arnoux PJ, Badih L, Bonnet F, Behr M. Implant-sup­ported overdentures with different clinical configurations: Mechanical resistance using a numerical approach. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.023

Cheng HC, Peng BY, Chen MS, Huang CF, Lin Y, Shen YK. Influence of deformation and stress between bone and implant from various bite forces by numerical simulation analysis. BioMed Research International. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2827953

Ahmad R, Chen J, Abu-Hassan MI, Li Q, Swain MV. Investigation of mucosa-induced residual ridge resorption under implant-retained overdentures and complete dentures in the mandible. The International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2015;30(3):657-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3844

Johar AO. Clinical performance of implant over­denture versus fixed detachable prosthesis. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2018;19(12):1480-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2453

Kim HS, Cho HA, Kim YY, Shin H. Implant sur­vival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0669-1

Lahoti K, Pathrabe A, Gade J. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-re­tained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Indian Journal of Dental Re­search. 2016;27(6):597-601. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.199587

Alsrouji MS, Ahmad R, Abdul Razak NH, Shuib S, Kuntjoro W, Baba NZ. Premaxilla Stress Distri­bution and Bone Resorption Induced by Implant Over­denture and Conventional Denture. Journal of Prost­hodontics. 2019;28(2):764-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12954

Kovacic I, Persic S, Kranjcic J, Lesic N, Cele­bic A. Rehabilitation of an extremely resorbed edentulous mandible by short and narrow dental implants. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7597851

Shrivastava R, Chaturvedi S, Verma AK, Ali M, Nagendra A, Chaturvedi M. Stress distribution under commercial denture liners. A finite element and clinical analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016;10(12):14-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/21466.9027

Yang X, Rong QG, Yang YD. [Influence of attachment type on stress distribution of implant-supported removable partial dentures]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015;47(1):72-77. Chinese.

Żmudzki J, Chladek G, Kasperski J. Biomechani­cal factors related to occlusal load transfer in removable complete dentures. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2015;14(4):679-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-014-0642-0

Żmudzki J, Chladek G, Malara P. Use of finite element analysis for the assessment of biomechanical factors related to pain sensation beneath complete dentures during mastication. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;120(6):934-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.002

Published

2020-12-28

How to Cite

1.
Fastovets O, Sapalov S, Shtepa V. Results of stress-strain states study in prosthetics of different types of atrophy of edentulous mandible. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2020Dec.28 [cited 2024Apr.19];25(4):146-58. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/221411

Issue

Section

CLINICAL MEDICINE