Hygienic evaluation of the most common methods of agricultural crops treatment with chemical protection products (literature review)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2021.3.241913

Keywords:

pesticides, working conditions, occupational risk, type of spraying, ecotoxicological risk, dispersion, biological efficiency

Abstract

Global strategies, including application of chemical plant protection products, are important in the cultivation of safe corps and preservation of human health. A promising area of preventive medicine, agronomy, agroecology and agroengineering is the optimization of methods of pesticide formulations application. The aim of the work was a hygienic assessment of the most common and latest methods of crops treatment with chemical pesticides. Results. The biological effectiveness of different types of pesticides is achieved by different application rates of the working solution. The most common method of pesticide application is spraying, which ensures the application of pesticides in the drop-liquid state and is characterized by low consumption of active substance per unit area, variable-controlled distribution on the treatment surface, provides good adhesion and retention on facilities, allows the use of combined formulations. One of the most effective ways to minimize the negative impact of chemical plant protection products and achieve economic success is a rational approach to the choice of pesticide application, as it takes into account the hazard class of pesticides, the presence of water protection zones, the sensitivity of target crops, etc. Conclusion. Rational application of pesticides includes minimizing the overall effect of pesticides on human health and the environment and achieving high-targeted biological efficiency. Adherence to the methodology of choosing the type of pesticide application and selection of the type of spray is a key point in optimizing the rational use of chemical plant protection products, which requires a detailed study from the standpoint of both efficiency and safety. Control over compliance with the recommendations should be included in sanitary-hygienic and sanitary-ecological monitoring.

References

Bublyk LI, Vasechko GI, Vasylіev VP. [Hand¬book of plant protection]. Editor MP Lisovyi. Kyiv: Urozhai; 1999. p. 744. Ukrainian.

Vavrinevych O. [Hygienic estimation of potential combined risk of mixed fungicide harmful effects on workers]. Ukrainian journal of occupational health, [Internet]. 2015;1(42):58-66. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2015.01.058

Antonenko AM, Vavrinevych OP, Korshun MM, Omelchuk ST, Stavnichenko PV. [Hygienic substantiation of the model of human hazard prediction when using agricultural products contaminated with pesticides (on the example of pyrazolecarboxamide class fungicides)]. Informaciinyi lyst pro novovvedennia v sferi okhorony zdorovia. 2018;29:4. Ukrainian.

Omelchuk ST, Stecenko OV, Gyrenko TV, Borysenko AA, Aleksiichuk VD. [Hygienic assessment of working conditions when using pesticides on soybeans]. Ukrayinskyi zhurnal z problem medycyny praci. 2019;15(3):240-6. Ukrainian. doi: https://doi.org/10.33573/ujoh2019.03.240

Lysov AK, Kornilov TV, Naumova NI, et al. [New ultra low volume spraying equipment in cabbage pest control, environmental and economic benefits]. Tekhnologii i tekhnicheskie sredstva mekhanizirovannogo proizvodstva produktsii rastenievodstva i zhivotnovodstva. 2019;1(98):115-24. Russian.

Markevich AYe, Nemirovets YuN. [Fundamentals of effective use of pesticides: a handbook of questions and answers on mechanization and quality control of pesticides in agriculture]. Gorki: educational institution "Mogilev state educational center for training, advanced training, retraining, consulting and agrarian reform"; 2004. p. 60. Russian.

[Methodical guidelines on study, estimation and reduction of risk of pesticides inhalation and dermal effects on the workers or by standerds during and after its application for plants and other objects chemical protection: 324/13.05.2009.]; 2009. p. 29. Ukrainian.

[On approvals by the Ministry of Health of plans for the implementation of certain acts of EU law: Order: No. 1141-р. from 26.11.2014]. [Internet]. Ukrainian. Available from: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1141-2014-р

Revyakin YeL, Krakhovetskiy NN [Machines for chemical protection of plants in innovative technologies: scientific. analyte. review]. Moskva: FGNU «Rosinfor-magrotekh»; 2010. p. 124. Russian.

Selivanov NI, Chepelev NI, Matyushev VV [Theoretical aspects of improving the safety of technological processes of agricultural enterprises]. Vestnik Altaiskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016;2:151-5. Russian.

Sidorenko V. [Current technological solutions for the effective use of pesticides]. [Internet]. Agronom; 2020. Russian. Available from: https://www.agronom.com.ua/aktualni-tehnologichni-rishennya-dlya-efektyvnogo-zastosuvannya-pestytsydiv/

Agricultural Spray Nozzles and Accessories. Catalogue Lechler. EN; 2012. p. 65.

Andrew Storrie. Reducing herbicide spray drift. NSW Department of Primary Industries. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/biosecurity/weeds/weed-control/herbicides/spray-drift

Fargnoli M, Lombardi M, Puri D, et al. A Risk Assessment Procedure for the Enhancement of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(3):310. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030310

Directive 2009/127/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 Amending Directive 2006/42/EC with Regard to Machinery for Pesticide Application. [Internet]. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/127/oj

Novohatska OO, Stavnichenko PV, Kondratiuk MV, et al. Comparative hygienic evaluation of behavior of different pesticides groups in soil, prediction of risk of ground water contamination and its danger for human health in areas with irrigation farming. Rawal Medical Journal. 2018;43(1):129-36.

Li Y, Li Y, Pan X, et al. Comparison of a new air-assisted sprayer and two conventional sprayers in terms of deposition, loss to the soil and residue of azoxystrobin and tebuconazole applied to sunlit greenhouse tomato and field cucumber. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74(2):448-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4728

Antonenko AM, Shpak BI, Vavrinevych OP, Bo¬rysenko AA, Omelchuk ST. Forecasting of the hazard for human health of the consumption of vegetables grown with the application of abamectin-based insecticide for¬mulations. Medical sciences: history, the present time, the future, EU experience: international scientific and practical conference. Poland: Wroclawek; 2019. Sep 27-28. p. 224-6.

Grella M, Gallart M, Marucco P, et al. Ground deposition and airborne spray drift assessment in vineyard and orchard: The influence of environmental variables and sprayer settings. Sustainability. 2017;9:728 doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050728

Machado SC, Martins I. Risk assessment of occupational pesticide exposure: Use of endpoints and surrogates. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018;276-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.08.008

Michael F. Wilson Optimising pesticide use. Application technologies. UK, 2003;1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470871792

Nasr GG, Yule AJ, Bendig L Agricultural Sprays. Industrial Sprays and Atomization Design, Analysis and Applications. UK. 2002;185-208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3816-7_5

Omelchuk SТ, Vavrinevych ОP, Antonenko АМ, Bardov VG. Forecastins the risk of bifenthrin-based insecticides for human health when consuming agricultural products grown after their application. One Health and Nutrition Problems of Ukraine. 2019;1(50):28-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.33273/2663-9726-2019-50-1-28-33

Overview of Risk Assessment in the Pesticide Program. US EPA. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/overview-risk-assessment-pesticide-program

Paul E. Sumner. ReducingSpray Drift. The Uni¬versity of Georgia and Ft. Valley State College, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Counties of the state Cooperating. Available from: https://athenaeum.libs.uga.edu/bitstream/handle/10724/34969/reducing.pdf?sequence=1

Recommendations for spraying technology for field crops. Available from: https://www.syngenta.kz/rekomendacii-po-tehnologii-opryskivaniya-polevyh-kultur

Reducing Spray Drift (AE1210, Reviewed June 2017). Available from: https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/crops/reducing-spray-drift

Robert E. Wolf. Strategiesto Reduce Spray Drift. Kansas State University. Available from: http://cotton.tamu.edu/Weeds/Spray%20Drift%20Strat.pdf

Llop J, Gil E, Gallart M, et al. Spray distribution evaluation of different settings of a hand‐held‐trolley sprayer used in greenhouse tomato crops. Pest Management Science. 2015;72:505-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4014

TeeJet Technologies. A Spraying Systems Company. Wheaton; 2007. p. 192.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Borysenko А, Antonenko А, Shpak B, Omelchuk S, Bardov V. Hygienic evaluation of the most common methods of agricultural crops treatment with chemical protection products (literature review). Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2021Sep.30 [cited 2022May17];26(3):19-25. Available from: http://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/241913

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL MEDICINE

Most read articles by the same author(s)