Electromyographic features of the perineum and pelvic floor in patients with an artificial bladder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2021.3.241930Keywords:
artificial bladder, electromyographic, perineum, pelvic floor, bladder cancerAbstract
Aim – to assess the electromyographic features of the pelvic floor muscles and the sphincter apparatus in patients who underwent radical cystprostatectomy with the formation of an artificial bladder.The main study group consisted of 57 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent a standard radical cystprostatectomy with ileocystoplasty. The study of the pelvic floor muscular bioelectric activity with computed electromyography (EMG) of the sphincter apparatus of the pelvic organs was carried out on a 2-channel computer electromyograph "NeuroTrac ™ MyoPlus4". The obtained results of the study of the bioelectric activity of the pelvic floor muscles showed a decrease in the amplitude of contractions in the Work Average mode by 42.1% (p≤0.001) for the perineal electrode, and by 35.7% (p≤0.05) for the rectal electrode, compared with the control group, which indicates a low contractility of the muscular diaphragm of the pelvis and may cause incontinence in patients with an artificial bladder. The average deviation over the entire duration of the session in Work mode in the group of patients with neobladder in channels A and B was 2.3 (p≤0.05) and 1.9 (p≤0.05) times higher, respectively, compared with control group. These data indicate an imbalance in the muscle tone of the pelvic floor in patients after extensive reconstructive intervention on the pelvic organs and can potentiate urodynamic disorders in the study group of patients. The average amplitude (Rest Average) of the activity of biopotentials in the resting state of the pelvic floor muscles along channels A and B is higher by 42.4% and 47.6% (p≤0.05), in comparison with the control group, which indicates insufficient relaxation and rest of striated muscles and sphincter. Despite the change in bioelectric potentials from the rectal electrode in the study group of patients, there were no signs of functional insufficiency of the anal sphincter, in contrast to the severity of urinary incontinence, which correlated and corresponded to the results of bioelectrical changes obtained through channels A and B, up to oscillations and loss of complete control. The EMG analysis of the pelvic floor muscles revealed characteristic changes in the biopotentials of the pelvic sphincters and indicated their relationship with the clinical features of the rehabilitation of this group of patients and the prospect of including the biofeedback method. It is a derivative form of the electromyographic signal in the treatment of incontinence in patients with neobladder.
References
Truhacheva NB. [Mathematical statistics in bio¬medical research using the Statistica package]. Moscow: Media; 2012. p. 379. Russian.
Yang LS, Shan BL, Shan LL, Chin P, Murray S, Ahmadi N, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;25(3):281-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.027
Chen Y, Lin P, Jou Y, Lin V. Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0130867. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130867
Hacad CR, Glazer HI, Zambon JP, Burti JS, Almeida FG. Is there any change in pelvic floor electromyography during the first 6 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy? Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2015 Mar 1;40(1):9-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9271-3
Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Sullivan R, Witjes JA. Economic Burden of Bladder Cancer Across the European Union. Eur. Urol. 2015 Oct 25;69(3):438-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.024
Goldberg H, Baniel J, Mano R, Rotlevy G, Kedar D, Yossepowitch O. Orthotopic neobladder vs. ileal conduit urinary diversion: A long-term quality-of-life comparison. Urol. Oncol. 2016 Mar;34(3):121:e1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.10.006.
Pavlovich C, Rocco B, Druskin S, Davis J. Urinary continence recovery after radical prostatectomy – anatomical/reconstructive and nerve-sparing techniques to improve outcomes. ВJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):185-96. Epub 2017 Apr 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13852
Schmitt J, Singh R, Weaver AL, Mara KC, Harvey-Springer R, Fick F, et al. Prospective Outcomes of a Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Program Including Vagi¬nal Electrogalvanic Stimulation for Urinary, Defecatory, and Pelvic Pain Symptoms. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Mar/Apr;23(2):108-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000371
Nayak AL, Cagiannos I, Lavallée LT, Morash C, Hickling D, Mallick R, et al. Urinary function following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder urinary reconstruction. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Jun;12(6):181-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4877
Young MJ, Elmussareh M, Weston P, Dooldeniya M. Radical cystectomy in the elderly – Is this a safe treatment option? Arab J Urol. 2017 Oct 05;15(4):360-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Medicni perspektivi (Medical perspectives)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.