The ratio of the subjective audiometry in patients with acoustic trauma and “noisy” production workers.

Authors

  • T. А. Shydlovska
  • L. H. Petruk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2014.4.35813

Keywords:

sensorineural hearing loss, acoustic trauma, subjective audiometry, hearing thresholds, auditory analyzer

Abstract

Introduction: The problem of diagnosis and treatment of sensorineural hearing loss (SHL), including forms developed under the influence of noise, takes one of the leading places in ot­olaryngology. However, there are not many studies on acoustic trauma, although this problem has recently become more and more important. Objective: A comparison of subjective audiometry in patients with sensorineural hearing loss after acute acoustic trauma and chronic noise exposure. Materials and methods. In the work the results of exa­mination of 84 patients with acoustic trauma, 15 healthy as the control group and 15 workers employed on 'noise' occupations as a comparison group are given. Subjective audiometry was fully carried out by clinical audiometer AC-40 «Interacoustics» (Denmark). Hearing indices were investigated in the conventional (0,125-8) kHz and extended (9-16) kHz frequency bands. Results: Subjective audiometry showed a reduction in sound perception in all patients. Ac­cor­ding to the threshold tone audiometry in patients with acoustic trauma hearing thresholds were authentically (P <0,05) increased by 4, 6 and 8 kHz tones of conventional (0,125-8) kHz frequency band and by 14-16 kHz tones of the extended (9-16 kHz) in comparison with the control group, as with workers employed on noise occupations. All the examined patients had deterioration of speech-test audiometry and above-threshold audiometry. Conclusions: According to su­b­jective audiometry, the type similar disorders of auditory function are in patients with acoustic trauma as in patients with long-term noise exposure, but they are more pronounced and develop much faster. The most informative features which show the origin and progression of hearing loss in patients with acoustic trauma are: increasing hearing thresholds by 14 and 16 kHz tones of the extended (9-16 kHz) frequency band and by 4, 6 and 8 kHz tones of con­ven­tional (0,125-8) kHz frequency band plus the reduction of differential thresholds (DT) according to the Lusher’s method at 4 kHz.

Author Biographies

T. А. Shydlovska

State Institution «Institute of Otolaryngology named after Prof. O.S. Kolomiychenko NAMS of Ukraine»
Zoologichna str., 3, Kiev, 03057, Ukraine

L. H. Petruk

State Institution «Institute of Otolaryngology named after Prof. O.S. Kolomiychenko NAMS of Ukraine»
Zoologichna str., 3, Kiev, 03057, Ukraine

References

Гапноева Э.Т. Особенности поражения слухо¬вого анализатора при минно-взрывной травме / Э.Т. Гапноева, Д.Б. Кирсанова // Вестник оторино¬ларин¬гологии. – 2006. – №1. – С.51-54

Изотова В.В. Особенности тональной аудио¬мет¬рии у лиц, подвергающихся воздействию низко¬частотных акустических колебаний / В.В. Изотова, А.Б. Селезнева, В.В. Дворянчикова // Рос. оторинола¬рингология. – 2009. – №4 (41). – С. 64-68.

Панкова В.Б. Тугоухость у работников транс¬порта / В.Б. Панкова // Рос. оториноларингология. – 2010. – Приложение №2. – С. 59-65.

Петрова Н.Н. Профессиональные болезни ор¬гана слуха / Н.Н. Петрова, А.Т. Пакунов // Профес¬сиональные болезни верхних дыхательных путей и уха. – СПб.: Гиппократ, 2009. – С. 527-545.

Професійна приглухуватість шумової етіології (діагностика, класифікація, експертиза працездат¬ності, профілактика): метод. рекомендації / Д.І. Забо¬лот¬ний, О.П. Краснюк, Т.В. Шидловська [та ін.] // під ред. Ю.І. Кундієва. – К., 2001. – 30 с.

Состояние слухового и вестибулярного анали¬заторов у больных с минно-взрывной травмой / В.Т. Паль¬чун, Н.Л. Кунельская, Е.М. Полякова [и др.] // Вестник оториноларингологии. – 2006.  № 4. – С. 24-26.

Шидловська Т.В. Слухові порушення в рецеп¬торному та корковому відділах слухового аналізатора при дії шуму з урахуванням його інтенсивності та характеру / Т.В. Шидловська, О.П. Яворовський, М.В. Вер¬теленко // Журнал вушних, носових і гор¬лових хвороб. – 2008. - № 6. – С. 2-10.

Шидловська Т.В. Сенсоневральна приглуху¬ва¬тість / Т.В. Шидловська, Д.І. Заболотний, Т.А. Шид¬ловська, – К.: Логос, 2006. – 779 с.

Axelsson A. Acute Acoustic Trauma / A. Axels¬son, R.P. Hamernik // Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). – 1987. – N 104. – P. 225-233.

Beagley H.A. Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig / H.A. Bea¬gley // Acta Otolaryngol. – 1965. – Vol. 60, N 5. - Р. 437-451.

Davoodi M. Noise-induced hearing Loss / M. Da¬voodi // Int. J. Occup. Environ Med. – 2010. – Vol. 1, N 3. – P. 146.

Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers / P.M. Rabinowitz, D. Galusha, S.R. Kirsche, M.R. Cullen [et al.] // Occup Environ Med. – 2011. – Vol. 68, N 6. – P. 414-418.

Michler S.A. Expression of plasticity asssociated proteins is affected by unilanerfl noise trauma / S.A. Mi¬chler, R. E.Illing, R. Laszig // [4th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Abstracts] // Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. – 2000. – N 1, Suppl. 79. – P. 202.

REFERENCES

Gapnoeva JeT, Kirsanova DB. [Features of a lesion of the auditory analyzer after mine explosion injury]. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2006;1:51-54. Russian.

Izotova VV, Selezneva AB, Dvorjanchikova VV. [Features of the tone audiometry in individuals exposed to low-frequency acoustic vibrations]. Rossijskaja otorino¬laringologija. 2009;4(41):64-68. Russian.

Pankova VB. [Hearing loss at transport workers]. Rossijskaja otorinolaringologija. Appendix N 2. 2010;59-65. Russian.

Petrova NN, Pakunov AT. [Occupational diseases of the auditory organ. In the book "Occupational diseases of the upper respiratory tract and ear."]. SPb. Gippokrat, 2009;527-45. Russian.

Zabolotnij DІ, Krasnjuk OP, Shidlovs'ka TV. [Occupational hearing loss noise etiology (diagnosis, classification, working capacity examination, prevention): Guidelines]. under the editorship Ju.І. Kundієv. K., 2001;30. Russian.

Pal'chun VT, Kunel'skaja NL, Poljakova EM. [Sta¬te of hearing and vestibular analyzers in patients with mine-explosion injury]. Vestnik otorinolaringologii. 2006;4:24-26. Russian.

Shidlovs'ka TV, Javorovs'kij OP, Vertelenko MV. [Hearing disorders in the receptor and cortical parts of the auditory analyzer under the influence of noise considering its intensity and character]. Zhurnal vushnih, nosovih і gorlovih hvorob. 2008;6:2-10. Russian.

Shidlovs'ka TV, Zabolotnij DІ, Shidlovs'ka TA. [Sensoryneural hearing loss]., Logos, 2006;779. Russian.

Axelsson A, Hamernik RP. Acute Acoustic Trauma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1987;104:225-33.

Beagley HA. Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. 1965;60(5):437-51.

Davoodi M. Noise-induced hearing Loss. Int. J. Occup Environ Med. 2010;1(3):P.146.

Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Kirsche SR, Cullen MR, Slade MD, Dixon-Ernst C. Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(6):414-18.

Michler SA, Illing RE, Laszig R. Expression of plasticity asssociated proteins is affected by unilanerfl noise trauma. 4th European Congress of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery. Abstracts: La¬ryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2000;1(79):202.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-24

How to Cite

1.
Shydlovska TА, Petruk LH. The ratio of the subjective audiometry in patients with acoustic trauma and “noisy” production workers. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2014Nov.24 [cited 2024Mar.29];19(4):154-8. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/35813

Issue

Section

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE