Procedural status of a defender for the criminal procedure code of Ukraine: problems of regulation and ways of their improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.127167Keywords:
criminal proceeding, procedural status, defender, barrister, defense side, duties, rightsAbstract
There is considered the question of legislative regulation of the procedural status (rights and duties) of a defender in a criminal proceeding. It was determined, tрat according to the valid Criminal procedural code of Ukraine of 2012, proxies of a defender remain insufficiently regulated, because the separated paragraph, devoted to this question is absent. Having analyzed requirements of paragraph 46 of CPC of Ukraine, it was stated, that rights of a defender are derivative from rights of a suspected, accused person, whose defense is realized. According to the author, it is conditioned by the fact that as opposite to other participants of a criminal proceeding, a defender cannot participate in it independently. At the same time such situation in any case must not influence the distinct fixation of correspondent rights and duties of a defender in the CPC of Ukraine. The determination and distinct fixation of correspondent rights and duties of a defender in the CPC of Ukraine will be a guarantee of providing the effective defense of rights, freedoms and legal interests of a suspected person by him. Having studied statements of the CPC of Ukraine, there was determined that the procedural status of a defender includes several “familiar” statuses. Especially, from one side a defender has right of a suspected person, from another one – legal barrister status. Thus, the volume of criminal procedural rights and guarantees of their realization is essentially wider in a defender than in a suspected person. It is proved also by the fact that a suspected person hasn’t a right to sent a barrister inquiry that is realized by a defender for obtaining stuff, copies of documents, information, conclusions of experts, conclusions of revisions, acts of examination from state authorities, local administration, enterprises, institutions, official and physical persons. That is why rights of a barrister and suspected person cannot be identified by volume
References
- Biryukova, A. M. (2010). Protsesualnyi status advokata na dosudovomu slidstvi. Chasopys Akademii advokatury Ukrainy, 9, 1–5.
- Tatarov, O. Yu., Cherniavskyi, S. S. (2015). Uchast zakhysnyka u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: problemy zakonodavchoho vrehuliuvannia. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 2, 77–84.
- Balatska, O. R. (2016). Pryroda i zmist pravovoho statusu zakhysnyka v kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia, 22, 167–170.
- Fomina, T. H. (2014). Zabezpechennia slidchym protsesualnykh prav pidozriuvanoho. Kharkiv: NikaNova, 232.
- Yanovych, Yu. P. (2017). Nevid’iemni osobysti protsesualni prava pidozriuvanoho v kryminalnomu provadzhenni: obsiah i tsilove pryznachennia. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav, 3 (78), 104–112.
- Yanovych, Yu. P. (2013). Funktsionalne pryznachennia zakhysnyka v kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. No. 1082. Seriia «PRAVO», 16, 200–203.
- Udalova, L. D., Savytska, S. L. (2014). Kryminalno-protsesualni harantii diialnosti advokata. Kyiv: KNT, 170.
- Martovytska, O. V. (2014). Realizatsiia pravovoi dopomohy na stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Kharkiv, 20.
- Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. No. 4651-VI (2012). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
- Honcharenko, V. H., Nor, V. T., Shumylo, M. Ye. (Eds.) (2012). Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar. Kyiv: Yustinian, 1224.
- Kovalskyi, V. S. (2013). Novyi Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: komentari, roz’iasnennia, dokumenty. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 408.
- Pro advokaturu ta advokatsku diialnist: zakon Ukrainy vid 05.07.2012 r. № 5076-VI (2013). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady, 27, 282. Available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5076-17
- Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy zakon Latvii (2005). Prinyatyy Seymom 21 aprelya 2005 goda i obnarodovannyy Prezidentom gosudarstva 11 maya 2005 goda. Available at: http://www.pravo.lv/likumi/29_upz.html
- Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belorus' ot 16.07.1999 g. № 295–Z (1999). Available at: http://ugolovnykodeks.ru/category/ugolovno–processualnyj–kodeks–respubliki–belarus/
- Karpov, N. S. (2013). Usunennia zakhysnyka vid uchasti u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: materialy kruhloho stolu. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: pershi problemy ta zdobutky. Zaporizhzhia: Klasychnyi pryvatnyi universytet, 36–37.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Serhii Ablamskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
