Legal instruments for improving the authority of the court

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.127441

Keywords:

court, judicial power, openness of the judiciary, authority of the court, public control, judicial decision, access to judicial decisions, Register of judicial decisions

Abstract

The article is devoted to the mechanism of increasing the authority of the court, one of the tools of which are called ensuring the availability of results of court activities - judicial decisions. The author's vision of the transformation of the existing concept of openness of the judiciary and the conditions for the realization of the right of every person to access judicial decisions are formulated, in particular, a number of proposals are indicated, aimed at optimizing the technical and organizational legal conditions for the functioning of the Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions.

The author analyzes the current normative provision of the procedure for publishing a court decision, clarifies the conflicts of legal regulation and problems of the practice of law enforcement. Two areas of relations are identified which arise in the process of providing access to court decisions. The first is external, which is to ensure everyone's right to access to a court decision. The second ones are internal, which establish the organizational framework for the formation and use of the Registry. Research in each direction allowed the author to formulate a series of proposals aimed at optimizing the mechanism for ensuring access to court decisions.

Since most court decisions are standard in certain categories of cases, they are of interest only to a particular territorial community living within the jurisdiction of the court, the question is whether the decentralization of the Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions is expedient by introducing the practice of publishing such decisions on the website of the courts that adopted them. The Registry should only send a decision in which in a new way interpretations of the legal norm that were relevant for the formation of a new jurisprudence, or decisions that have a significant social resonance and may be of interest to a larger audience than a territorial community within the jurisdiction of the court.

In addition, all decisions of the Supreme Court are necessarily included in the Register, since its decisions are of a provisional nature and influence the maintenance of uniformity of judicial practice, predictability of court decisions. A number of proposals for improving technical administration of the Unified State Register of Judicial Decisions

Author Biography

Lidiya Moskvych, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

Doctor of Law Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Organization of Judicial and Law Enforcement Bodies

References

  1. Il'ichev, L. F., Fedoseev, P. N., Kovalev, S. N., Panov, V. G. (Eds.) (1983). Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 840.
  2. Ledyaev, V. G. (2000). Formy vlasti: tipologicheskiy analiz. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2, 6–18.
  3. Tsitseron (1966). Dialogi O gosudarstve. O zakonakh. Moskva-Leningrad: Nauka, 224.
  4. Veber, M.; Davydova, Yu. N. (Ed.) (1990). Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow: Progress, 808.
  5. Rassel, B. (1994). Istoriya zapadnoy filosofii. Vol. 1. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 464.
  6. Raygorodskiy, D. Ya. (1999). Psikhologiya i psikhoanaliz vlasti. Vol. 2. Samara: BAKHRAKH, 576.
  7. Moskovichi, S. (1998). Vek tolp. Istoricheskiy traktat po psikhologii mass. Moscow: Tsentr psikhologii i psikhoterapii, 487.
  8. Bell, D.; Inozemtseva, V. L. (Ed.) (1999). Gryadushhee postindustrial'noe obshhestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. Moscow: Academia, 956.
  9. Pro dostup do sudovykh rishen. Zakon Ukrainy 22.12.2005. No. 3262-IV (2005). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3262-15
  10. Vidkrytist sudovoi systemy daietsia vazhko i doroho (2010). Rakhunkova palata Ukrainy. Available at: http://www.ac-rada.gov.ua/control/main/uk/publish/article/16730800
  11. Poriadok vedennia Yedynoho derzhavnoho reiestru sudovykh rishen. Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy 25.05.2006. No. 740 (2006). Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/740-2006-%D0%BF

Downloads

Published

2018-04-02

How to Cite

Moskvych, L. (2018). Legal instruments for improving the authority of the court. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1 (3), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.127441

Issue

No. 1 (3) (2018)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Lidiya Moskvych

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.