The public’s attitudes towards tobacco sales prohibitions: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in the former Soviet state of Georgia

Authors

  • George D. Bakhturidze Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Implementation and Monitoring Center in Georgia, Georgia
  • Nana T. Peikrishvili Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Implementation and Monitoring Center in Georgia, Georgia
  • Maurice B. Mittelmark Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway
  • Leif E. Aarø Department of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen Division of Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Caucasus region country of Georgia, no data on public opinion regarding tobacco sales restrictions have been available until now. The aim of the study is to provide data from a nationally representative sample including non-smokers, ex-smokers and current smokers, on their level of support for restricting tobacco sales.

METHODS: 1,588 people aged 13-70 were interviewed at home about their level of agreement with eight possible tobacco sales restrictions, which were combined to create a dichotomous scale indicating low agreement (agree with none to three of eight restrictions) or high agreement (agree with four or more of eight restrictions). Levels of agreement were analyzed by demographic segments defined by age, gender, education and income and by tobacco use status.

RESULTS: Across all eight forms of tobacco sales restrictions, the average support for tobacco sales restrictions was 85.2% which is a high level of support.

Among smokers, 71% of women and 87% of men indicated a high level of agreement for restricted tobacco sales; among occasional smokers 54% and 55% respectively. Above 95% of female and male ex-smokers and never smokers expressed high level of agreement with sales restrictions.

After adjustment for other predictors, agreement was significantly associated with age (more agreement with higher age) and smoking status (more agreement among never-smokers, less in current smokers), while there were no significant differences in agreement by gender, education, and income.

DISCUSSION: It is of high importance for Georgia to fully implement the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, including strong sales restrictions, and there is good evidence of public support for doing so.

CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate to Georgian public health authorities that the support for tightened tobacco sales restrictions is high.

KEYWORDS: tobacco; tobacco control; tobacco control policy; public attitude; sales restriction; tobacco sales restriction; youth access; law; FCTC.

References

Anderson J, E. (2006). Public Policymaking. Wadsworth, Belmont, USA.

Andreeva, T., at al. (2005). Tobacco in Ukraine: national survey of knowledge, attitudes and behavior. A survey of Ukrainian population by Kiev International Institute of Sociology commissioned by the International Centre for Policy Studies, 71.

Ashley, M., Cohen, J., Bull, Sh., Ferrence, R., Poland, B., Pederson, L., & Gao, J. (2000). Knowledge about tobacco and attitudes toward tobacco control. How different are smokers and nonsmokers? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 376-80.

Bakhturidze, G., et al. (2008). Population survey on tobacco economy and policy in Georgia. FCTC Implementation and Monitoring Center in Georgia,4-22.

Borland, R. (2006). Support for and reported compliance with smoke-free restaurants and bars by smokers in four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control, 15, iii34-iii41.

Brenner, H., et al. (1997). Smoking Behaviour and Attitude Toward Smoking Regulations and Passive Smoking in the

Workplace. Preventive Medicine, 26, 138-143.

Brooks, D. (2001). Support for smoke-free restaurants among Massachusetts adults, 1992-1999. American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 300-303.

Castrucci, B. C., Gerlach, K. K., Laufman, N. J and Orleans, T. C. (2002). Adolescents’ acquisition of cigarettes through noncommercial sources. J Adolesc Health, 31, 322-6.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS. 584-626.

Forster, J. L., & Wolfson, M. (1998). Youth access to tobacco: policies and politics. Ann Rev Public Health, 19, 203–35.

Georgian Law on Tobacco Control, updated in December 15, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/files/live/Georgia/Georgia%20-%20TC%20Law%202010.pdf

Gilmore, A., Pomerleau, J., McKee, M., Rose, R., Haerpfer, Ch., Rotman, D., & Tumanov, S. (2004). Prevalence of Smoking in 8 Countries of the Former Soviet Union: Results From the Living Conditions, Lifestyles and Health Study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(12), 2177-87.

Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy – policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, 129, 163, 185-204.

Jha, P., & Chaloupka, F. (2000). Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, 46-61.

Kinder, D., & Sears, D. (1985). Public Opinion and Political Action. The Handbook of Social Psychology,II,659-741.

Kingdon, J. (2011). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Longman classics in political science, 196-208.

Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed. Longman, New York.

Laforge, G. R., Velicer, F. W., Levesque, A. D., Fava, L. J., Hill, J. D., Schofield, E. P., Fan, D., Vries, H., Shisana, O. W., & Conner, M. (1998). Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries. Tobacco Control, 7, 241–246.

Lam, T. H., et al. (2002). Public opinion on smoke-free policies in restaurants and predicted effect on patronage in Hong Kong. Tobacco Control, 11, 195-200.

Muggli, M., Hurt, R., & Blanke, D. (2003). Science for hire: A tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5, 303–314.

National Statistics Office of Georgia. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.geostat.ge/index.php?action=page&p_id=152&lang=eng

Novotny, T., & Mamudu, H. (2008). Progression of tobacco control policies: Lessons from the United States and Implications for Global Action. World Bank publications.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual. Open University Press, 118-200.

Pederson, U., Bull, Sh., Ashley, M., & Lefcoe, N. (1987). A Population Survey in Ontario Regarding Restrictive Measures on Smoking: Relationship of Smoking Status to Knowledge, Attitudes and Predicted Behaviour. International Journal of Epidemiology, 16(3).

Rigotti, N. A., et al. (2003). Students’ opinion of tobacco control policies recommended for US colleges: a national survey. Tobacco Control, 12, 251-256.

Rimpela, A., & Aaro E. L. (1993). The effects of tobacco sales promotion on initiation of smoking – experiences from Finland and Norway. Scand J Social Med, 49, 5-23.

Stein, E., et al. (2005). The Politics of Policies: Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.

Trotter, L., & Mullins, R. (1996). Environmental tobacco smoke: Surveys of restaurant patrons and hospitality industry personnel. Quit Evaluation Studies, 9, 27-41.

Walsh, R., et al. (2002). Environmental tobacco smoke in homes, motor vehicles and licensed premises: community attitudes and practices. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 26(6), 536-542.

Warren, Ch., Jones, N., Peruga, A., Chauvin, J., Baptiste, J-P., Costa de Silva, V., Awa, F., Tsouros, A., Rahman, Kh., Fishburn, B., Bettcher, D., & Asma, S. (2008). Global Youth Tobacco Surveillance, 2000—2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 57(SS01),1-21.

WHO (2004). European Strategy for Smoking Cessation Policy. European Tobacco Control Policy Series, WHO, 4-29.

WHO (2005). WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. WHO, Geneva, 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/tobacco/framework/WHO_FCTC_english.pdf

WHO (2007). Protection from exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke. Policy recommendations. WHO, 2-35.

WHO (2007). The European Tobacco Control Report. WHO, Copenhagen, 12-85.

WHO (2012). Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/fctc/signatories_parties/en/index.html

WHO (2012). WHO Global Report – Mortality attributable to tobacco. WHO, Geneva, 2-14.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-21