Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the modern nasal corticosteroids for the allergic rhinitis treatment.

Authors

  • A. G. Zadorozhna
  • O. V. Makarenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2018.1.124949

Keywords:

the allergic rhinitis, pharmacoeconomic assessment, nasal corticosteroids, pharmacotherapy

Abstract

The increase of allergic rhinitis incidence is an actual problem for industrial cities. The literature data on allergic rhinitis incidence in countries of Europe andUkrainewas analyzed. According to different authors, the allergic rhinitis is registered in 12-24% of the inhabitants of the Russian Federation, 26-40% - of the USA, 24-32% - of France, 16% – of the UK, and 19% – of Denmark. There were distinguished three main clinical forms of allergic rhinitis: light, moderate and heavy. General pharmacotherapy principles of the light and moderate forms of allergic rhinitis course are presented in the current article. There were indicated medicines for the first-line therapy of allergic rhinitis group "R01AD" - the medicines acting on the respiratory system, decongestants and other drugs for topical use in diseases of the nasal cavity, corticosteroids. The assortment of nasal corticosteroids is presented by mometasone (13 trade names), beclamethasone (2 trade names), fluticasone propionate (5 trade names). It is also shown that 95.6% of the nasal corticosteroids is imported from 9 countries, mainly fromIndiaandBelgium. The Ukrainian spray Forinex produced by Pharmac is the only representative among the R01AD group, but unfortunately, according to pricing range is not a drug of choice among nasal corticosteroids. The received data testify to the risk of inclusion of only imported drugs in the insurance list and the low replacement rate by the Ukrainian drug for treatment of the allergic rhinitis.

Author Biographies

A. G. Zadorozhna

O.O. Bogomolets National medical university
Department of Otorhinolaryngology
Т. Shevchenko boul., 13, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine

O. V. Makarenko

SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine»
V. Vernadsky str., 9, Dnipro, 49044, Ukraine

References

Vaskova LB, Musyna NZ. [Methods and me­thods of pharmacoeconomic research]. Moskva, HEO­TAR-Medya. 2007;112. Russian.

Zabolotnyi DY. [Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis]. Zdorovia Ukrainy. 2009;9(1):9. Russian.

Vorobev PA, Avksenteva MV, Borysenko OV, et al. [Clinical and economic analysis]. Moskva, Niu­DYAMED. 2008;778. Russian.

Makarenko OV, Solomko DS. [Pharma­co­eco­no­mic evaluation of the treatment of allergic rhinitis]. Fa­rmako­lohiia ta likarska toksykolohiia. 2014;3(39):82-87. Russian.

Izquierdo-Domínguez A, Valero AL, Mullol J. Co­marative anal I of allergic rhiniti in children and adult. Curr. Allerg Athma R. 2013;13(2):142.

Hwang PH, Lin B, Weiss R, Atkins J, Johnson J. Cryosurgical posterior nasal tissue ablation for the treatment of rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhin. 2017;7(10):952-6.

Fernandes SSC, Andrade CR, Alvim CG, Ca­margos PAM, Ibiapina CDC. Epidemiological trends of allergicdiseases in adolescents. J Bras Pneumol. 2017;43(5):368-72.

Numminen J. Allergic rhinitis. Duodecim. 2017;133(5):473-8.

Szelenyi I. Allergic rhinitis: meaningful and less meaningful combination treatments including remini­scences. Pharmazie. 2014;69(6):414-6.

How to Cite

1.
Zadorozhna AG, Makarenko OV. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the modern nasal corticosteroids for the allergic rhinitis treatment. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2018Apr.2 [cited 2024Dec.23];23(1):107-12. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/124949

Issue

Section

SOCIAL MEDICINE