Stage approach in surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2020.2.206384

Keywords:

acute pancreatitis, minimally invasive interventions, stage approach

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of diagnosis and treatment of acute pancreatitis, which remains one of the most common surgical diseases of the abdominal cavity with a high risk of complications, the mortality rate of which reaches 5.5%, and in acute pancreatitis it varies within 40-70%. The purpose of this work is to improve the results of surgical treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis. The results of treatment of 112 patients with acute pancreatitis, who were hospitalized in the procedure of ambulance in the Department of Surgery No. 2 of the Bogomolets National Medical University in 2009-2019 period are analyzed. Severe disease course was observed in 83 (74.1%) patients, moderate – in 29 (25.9%) patients. In the early phase of the disease, endoscopic operations were performed in 44 (39.3%) patients, and laparotomy was performed in 12 (10.7%) patients with advanced purulent peritonitis. In the late phase 15 (13.4%) patients underwent laparotomy, necrsequestrectomy, abdominization of the pancreas, drainage of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space, 36 (32.1%) patients were treated with ultrasound-guided puncture treatments. In the case of progression of the disease and ineffective drainage under ultrasound control, 5 (4.5%) patients were treated with retroperitoneoscopically assisted necrsequestrectomy, combined laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopically assisted necrsequestrectomy was performed in 3 (2.7%) patients, and in 2 (1.8%) patients – open laparotomy, abdominization, necrsequestrectomy, drainage of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space. The surgical intervention in the late phase of the disease was 21±4.2 days from the onset of the disease. A stage approach in the treatment of acute pancreatitis was applied to 80 (71.4%) patients in the main group. The comparison group consisted of 32 (28.6%) patients who underwent laparotomy and laparoscopic interventions in the early and late periods of the disease without prior use of endoscopic interventions or drainage operations under ultrasound control. In the main group the length of stay in the hospital was 21,3±4,2 days, in the comparison group – 48.2±5.3 days respectively. In 42 (95.5%) patients who underwent endoscopic surgery, a positive clinical effect, rapid regression of symptoms of acute pancreatitis was achieved. In two (4.5%) patients who underwent endoscopic interventions, the disease progressed with the development of an abscess of the omental pouch, they underwent puncture drainage under ultrasound control. When using puncture drainage operations under ultrasound control in 26 (72.2%) patients, a positive result was achieved, the abscess cavity decreased by 63±6.2% within 7 days. In 10 (27.8%) patients due to the progression of the disease, the following stage of treatment was performed: retroperitoneoscopically assisted necrsequestrectomy (5 (13.9%) patients), combined laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopically assisted necrsequestrectomy (3 (8.3%) patients), and open laparotomy, abdominization, necrosequestrectomy, drainage of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space (2 (5.6%) patients). Complications in the main group developed in two (2.5%) patients, the mortality rate was 2.5% (two patients). In the comparison group, complications developed in 8 (25%) patients, the mortality rate was 18.8% (6 patients). The use of minimally invasive endoscopic interventions, draining surgeries under ultrasound control followed by combined laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopically assisted necrsequestrectomy or open laparotomy reduces the length of hospital stay of patients from 48.2±5.3 days (comparison group) to 21.3±4.2 days (main group) (p<0.0001, t=28.346) and the number of complications by 22.5% (p=0.0002, χ2=14.104, CI 9.2333-39.7022). The use of a stage approach in the surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis reduces mortality by 16.3% (p=0.0026, χ2 =9.058, CI 4.6571-32.9639).

Author Biographies

I. V. Kolosovych

Bogomolets national medical university

B. H. Bezrodnyi

Bogomolets national medical university

I. V. Hanol

Bogomolets national medical university

I. V. Cherepenko

Bogomolets national medical university

References

Goltsov VR, Savello VE, Bakunov AM, Dym­nikov DA, Kurochkin DM, Batig EV. [Purulent-Necrotic Parapancreatitis: the Evolution of Views on Treatment]. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2015;20(3):75-83. Russian. doi: https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2015375-83

Komarov MP. [Acute pancreatitis]. Adapted evidence-based clinical setting]. Kyiv: State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine; 2016:53. Ukainian.

Dronov ОІ, Коvahlska ІО, Burmich КS, Gor­lach АІ, Zadorozhna КО, Tsymbalyuk RS, Коvalenko АP, Shvets YuP, Chermak ІІ. [Combined laparoscopically and retroperitoneoscopically assisted pancreatonec­rsequestrectomy]. Klinichna khirurhiya. 2016;12:3-5. Ukainian. Available from: https://hirurgiya.com.ua/­index.php/journal/issue/download/114/12-2016

Popov AV, Mineev DA, Ershova AI, Popova NN. [Early diagnosis of mild acute pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia. 2016;(7):11-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016711-17

Wroński M, Cebulski W, Witkowski B, Jan­kowski M, Kluciński A, Krasnodębski IW, Słod­kowski M. [Comparison between minimally invasive and open surgical treatment in necrotizing pancreatitis]. J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:22-31. Epub 2016 Nov 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.10.022

Lichi Ke, Junhua Li, Peihong Hu, Lianqun W, Haiming C,Yaping Z. [Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Infected Pancreatitis Necrosis: a Systematic Review]. Indian J Surg. 2016;78(3):221-228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-016-1495-9

How to Cite

1.
Kolosovych IV, Bezrodnyi BH, Hanol IV, Cherepenko IV. Stage approach in surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2020Jul.1 [cited 2024Nov.23];25(2):124-9. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/206384

Issue

Section

CLINICAL MEDICINE