The prognostic value of pyeloectasis in infants with urinary syndrome.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2014.1.24698Keywords:
ultrasound examination, young children, diseases and malformations of the kidneys, pyeloectasiaAbstract
Aim of the study was of to determine prognostic value of pyeloectasias in the structure of urinary system diseases including the frequency of pyeloectasia and its clinical significance in young children at the stage of hospital treatment at the infectious disease department. The diagnosis of the diseases and malformations of the kidneys and the urinary tract ultrasound study of 192 children at the age of 1 month to – 2,5 years was conducted. Ultrasound study of the urinary system was performed by a standardized technique using ultrasound scanner «SIEMENS SONOLINE G40» (company Siemens, Germany) using a 2.5-5 MHz convex probe, and 7.5-10 MHz linear transducer. Pyeloectasias are the most often sonologic symptom in young age children presenting urinary syndrome (75% of researches). Obtained results of catamnestic follow ups showed that sizes of renal pelvis of more than 10 mm are the risk factors for acute pyelonephritis development.References
Аренина Н.Ю. Особенности мочевыделительной функции плода при различных вариантах пренатального течения пиелоэктазии: автореф. дис. на соискание учен. степени канд. мед. наук / Н.Ю. Аре¬нина. – Саратов, 2011 – 25 с.
Васильев А.Ю. Ультразвуковая диагностика в неотложной детской практике / А.Ю. Васильев, Е.Б. Оль¬хова. – М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010. – 832 с.
Гуревич А.И. Комплексное ультразвуковое обследование детей раннего возраста с пиелоэктазией / А.И. Гуревич // Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. – 2005. – № 5. – С. 51-56.
Детская ультразвуковая диагностика в уро¬нефрологии / М.И. Пыков, А.И. Гуревич, А.В. Тру¬фанова [и др.] – М.: Из-во Видар – М, 2007. – 200 с.
Диагностические критерии функционального и органического поражения лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента у новорожденных / Т.В. Красовская, М.В. Левитская, Н.В. Голоденко [и др.] // Детская хи¬рургия. – 2002. – № 2. – С. 17–20.
Квятковский Е.А. Ультрасонография и допплерография в диагностике заболеваний почек / Е.А. Квятковский. – Днепропетровск, 2005. – 316 с.
Лапач С.Н. Статистические методы в медико-биологических исследованиях с использованием Excel / С.Н. Лапач, А.В. Чубенко, П.Н. Бабич. – К.: Морион, 2000. – 320 с.
Папаян А.В. Неонатальная нефрология / А.В. Па¬паян, И.С. Стяжкина. – СПб.: Питер, 2002. – 448 с.
Ультразвуковая диагностика в неонатологии / под ред. И.В. Дворяковского, Г.В. Яцык // Атмосфера. – М., 2012. – C. 88-91.
Ультразвуковая диагностика в оценке пиело¬эктазий у детей / И.С. Мавричева, И.В. Дворяковский, Т.В. Сергеева, Г.М. Дворяковская // Ультразвуковая и фун¬к¬циональная диагностика. – 2002.– № 2. – С.50-54.
De Bruyn R. Pediatric Ultrasound / R. De Bruyn. – Edinbourgh: Ch. Livingstone, 2005.- 373 p.
Mild pyelectasis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound is not a predictor of urinary tract morbidity in childhood [H.A. Damen-Elias, S.E. Luijnenburg, G.H. Visser, P.H. Stoutenbeek [et al.] // Prenat. Diagn. – 2005. – Vol. 25, N 13. – P.1239-1247.
Renal ultrasonography in infants with hydronephrosis / J. Svitac, M. Zibolen, J. Kliment, J. Buchanec // Int.Urol.- 2001. – Vol. 33, N 3. – P. 431-433.
Hélénon O. Techniques et résultats de l'échodoppler dans l'exploration de la vascularisation rénale et de l'appareil urinaire / O. Hélénon, J.-M. Correas // EMC - Radiologie – 2005 – Vol. 2, N 4. – P. 367-412.
Arenina NYu. [Features of fetal urinary function in different variants of prenatal pyeloectasia course]. Sa¬ratov: Avtoreferat na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni k.med.n. 2011:25. Russian.
Vasil'ev AYu, Ol'khova EB. [Ultrasound in emer¬gency pediatric practice]. Moskva: GEOTAR-Media. 2010:832. Russian.
Gurevich AI. [Integrated ultrasound examination in infants with pyeloectasia]. Ul'trazvukovaya i funktsional'naya diagnostika. 2005;5:51-56. Russian.
Pykov MI, Gurevich AI, Trufanova AV. [Children ultrasound diagnosties in Uronephrology]. M.: Izdatel'stvo Vidar. 2007:200. Russian.
Krasovskaya TV, Levitskaya MV, Golodenko NV. [Diagnostic criteria of functional and organic lesions of PPU segment in infants]. Detskaya khirurgiya. 2002;2:17–20. Russian.
Kvyatkovskiy EA. [Ultrasonography and Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of kidney disease]. Dnepropetrovsk. 2005:316. Russian.
Lapach SN, Chubenko AV, Babich PN. [Statistical methods in biomedical research using Excel]. K.: Morion. 2000:320. Russian.
Papayan AV, Styazhkina IS. [Neonatal nephrology]. Spb: Piter. 2002:448. Russian.
Dvoryakovskogo IV, Yatsyk GV. [Ultrasound dia¬gnosis in neonatology]. Moskva: Atmosfera. 2012:88-91. Russian.
Mavricheva IS, Dvoryakovskiy IV, Sergeeva TV, Dvoryakovskaya GM. [Ultrasound in the assessment of children’s pyeloectasis]. Ul'trazvukovaya i funktsional'naya diagnostika. 2002;2:50–54. Russian.
De Bruyn R. Pediatric Ultrasound. Edinbourgh: Ch. Livingstone. 2005:373.
Damen-Elias HA, Luijnenburg SE, Visser GH, Stoutenbeek PH, TP de Jong. Mild pyelectasis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound is not a predictor of urinary tract morbidity in childhood. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(13):1239-47.
Svitac J, Zibolen M, Kliment J, Buchanec J. Renal ultrasonography in infants with hydronephrosis. Int. Urol. 2001;33(3):431-3.
Hélénon O, Correas J-M. Techniques et résultats de l'échodoppler dans l'exploration de la vascularisation rénale et de l'appareil urinaire. EMC – Radiologie. 2005;2(4):367-412.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Medical Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.
