Specifics of using thoracic bandage after cardiac surgery via sternotomy and its impact on reducing pain during therapeutic exercises

V.V.  Vitomsky; M.V.  Vitomska; O.B. Lazarіeva

doi:10.26641/2307-0404.2022.2.260237

Authors

V.V. Vitomsky GI «Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine», Yu. Illienko str., 24, Kyiv, 04050; National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport, Fizkultury str., 1, Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4582-6004
M.V. Vitomska National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport, Fizkultury str., 1, Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-3954
O.B. Lazarіeva National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport, Fizkultury str., 1, Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7435-2127

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2022.2.260237

Keywords:

physical therapy, sternal precautions, cardiac rehabilitation, supportive devices

Abstract

Purpose: to investigate specifics of using thoracic bandage after cardiac surgery via sternotomy and its impact on reducing pain during therapeutic exercises. In order to study specifics of using a postoperative thoracic bandage on the seventh postoperative day patients (n=252) were asked two questions about the force of thorax compression exerted by the bandage. As soon as the questions were answered, the degree of thoracic bandage tension was also assessed by a physical therapist. Thereafter, some patients (n=44; who did not take painkillers within 12 hours before the examination) assessed pain on a numeric rating scale (10 points – maximum pain, 0 points – no pain) as follows: at rest, when coughing and moving their upper extremities (arms forward, sideward, upward), when wearing a bandage with and without a load (dumbbells 1 and 2 kg for each arm); then all points of the scale were assessed without wearing a thoracic bandage. Most of the patients noted that the bandage exerted light compression (184 patients) and did not restrict deep breathing (220 patients). The evaluation performed by a physical therapist found that a thoracic bandage had only a slight degree of tension in most of the patients (194 patients or 76.98%), since it was easy to slip the hand between the patient’s back and the bandage, stretching the latter with minimal effort. The use of a thoracic bandage had no impact on the pain when patients moved their upper extremities. The obtained pain rates were very low. The highest pain rates were obtained during coughing. When moving arms the level of pain did not change statistically as compared with the state of rest. Arm position and load increase within specific limits had no impact on pain level. The use of a postoperative thoracic bandage is characterized by its mild tension, which does not limit deep breathing and, consequently, cannot limit the increase of chest circumference during dehiscence. The assessment of tension performed by physical therapists was consistent with the patients’ responses. The use of a bandage did not reduce the level of pain when patients moved their upper extremities and coughed.

References

Adams J, Lotshaw A, Exum E, et al. An alternative approach to prescribing sternal precautions after median sternotomy, "Keep Your Move in the Tube". Proceedings: Baylor University. Medical Center. 2016;29(1):97-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2016.11929379

Balachandran S, Denehy L, Lee A, et al. Motion at the sternal edges during upper limb and trunk tasks in-vivo as measured by real-time ultrasound following cardiac surgery: a three-month prospective, observational study. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2019;28(8):1283-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.05.195

Balachandran S, Denehy L, Lee A, Royse A, El-Ansary D. Sternal micromotion during upper limb movements: Is it time for a change to sternal precautions following cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy? Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2015;24(3):S117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.010

Balachandran S. Sternal management following cardiac surgery. Dissertation, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/54793

Brocki BC, Thorup CB, Andreasen JJ. Precautions related to midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: a review of mechanical stress factors leading to sternal compli¬cations. European journal of cardiovascular nursing. 2010;9(2):77-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.11.009

Crawford MH. Current Diagnosis and Treatment Cardiology. McGraw-Hill Education; 2017. p. 640.

El-Ansary D, Waddington G, Adams R. Control of separation in sternal instability by supportive devices: a comparison of an adjustable fastening brace, compression garment, and sports tape. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2008;89(9):1775-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.025

Ge W, Sfara A, Hians B. Sternal skin strain during shoulder movements and upper extremity activities. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:e449-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3232

Gorlitzer M, Folkmann S, Meinhart J, et al. A newly designed thorax support vest prevents sternum instability after median sternotomy. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2009;36:335-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.01.038

Katijjahbe MA, Denehy L, Granger CL, et al. The Sternal Management Accelerated Recovery Trial (S.M.A.R.T) - standard restrictive versus an intervention of modified sternal precautions following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1974-8

Laurikka JO, Toivio I, Tarkka MR. Effects of a novel pneumatic vest on postoperative pain and lung function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Scan-dinavian cardiovascular journal. 1998;32(3):141-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14017439850140094

Markman JD, Gewandter JS, Frazer ME. Com-parison of a Pain Tolerability Question With the Numeric Rating Scale for Assessment of Self-reported Chronic Pain. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3155

Naismith C, Street A. Introducing the Cardibra: a randomised pilot study of a purpose designed support bra for women having cardiac surgery. European journal of cardiovascular nursing. 2005;4:220-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.008

Nisbet R, Miner G, Yale K. A Handbook of Sta-tistical Analysis and Data Mining Applications. Academic Press; 2018. p. 822.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06451-4

Parker R, Adams JL, Ogola G, et al. Current acti-vity guidelines for CABG patients are too restrictive: comparison of the forces exerted on the median sternotomy during a cough vs. lifting activities combined with valsalva maneuver. The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon. 2008;56(04):190-4.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1038470

Vitomskyi VV, Al-Hawamdeh K, Vitomska M, Lazarіeva O, Haidai O. The effect of incentive spirometry on pulmonary function recovery and satisfaction with physical therapy of cardiac surgery patients. Advances in Rehabilitation. 2021;35(1):9-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.5114/areh.2020.102020

Vitomskyi V. Comparison of three respiratory physical therapy techniques and their impact on pulmonary function restoration among cardiac surgery patients in hospital settings. Zaporozhye medical journal. 2021;23(4):531-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2021.4.226538

Vitomskyi VV, Lazarіeva OB, Doroshenko Eyu, et al. The impact of mobilization protocols on the length of postoperative hospitalization among cardiac surgery pa¬tients. Zaporozhye medical journal. 2021;23(2):259-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2021.2.228781

Vitomskyi VV. Тheoretical model of sternum ex-ternal fixation functioning in physical therapy of patients following cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Art of Medicine. 2020;3:203-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.21802/artm.2020.3.15.203