Medico-social conditions of educational activity, quality of life and aspects of psychophysiological adaptation of modern pupils and students: features of interrelation and their hygienic assessment

O.V.  Tymoshchuk; I.V.  Serheta; О.S.  Malyshevska; V.I.  Melnyk; V.B.  Motriuk

doi:10.26641/2307-0404.2023.1.276203

Authors

O.V. Tymoshchuk Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Halytska str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76001, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-9951
I.V. Serheta National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Pirogov str., 56, Vinnytsia, 21018, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-3833
О.S. Malyshevska Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Halytska str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76001, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-2112
V.I. Melnyk Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Halytska str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76001, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2641-9673
V.B. Motriuk Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Halytska str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76001, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-8614

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.1.276203

Keywords:

pupils and students, educational activity, medico-social conditions, quality of life, psychophysiological adaptation, hygienic assessment

Abstract

The purpose of the study is a comprehensive hygienic assessment of the relationship between medico-social conditions of educational activities, quality of life and adaptive capabilities of students. During the research conducted on the basis of 5 modern educational institutions of different types: university, college, specialized school, lyceum and school, the significant deviations of indicators of hygienic assessment of daily regimen of pupils and students from generally accepted normative values (p<0.05-0.001)were revealed, which, first of all, concerned the excess of the maximum allowable duration of their daily stay in educational institutions, the length of time required to complete homework, low levels of physical activity, etc. It was found that the highest levels of quality of life among boys and girls are recorded according to the scales of Physical Functioning (PF), Bodily Pain (BP) and Role-Physical (RP), the lowest ones were Mental Health (MH), Vitality (VT) and Social Functioning (SF). The relationships between the values that indicate the characteristics of quality of life and features of the psychophysiological adaptation of pupils and students were revealed. Moreover, the largest number of relationships (r=0.36-0.77; p<0.05-0.001) which characterize quality of life indicators belong to boys according to the scales of Physical Functioning (PF), Mental Health (MH), Vitality (VT) , Bodily Pain (BP); to girls – Bodily Pain (BP), Vitality (VT), Mental Health (MH), General Health (GH), Role-Emotional (RE). When determining the features of intersystem relationships between components of quality of life and indicators of psychophysiological functions, it was found that the closest relationship (r=0.37-0.99; p<0.05-0.001) is observed between the characteristics of the speed of visual-motor reactions, mobility and balance of nervous processes, coordination of movements and indicators of quality of life according to the scales of General Health (GH), Physical Functioning (PF), Social Functioning (SF) and Mental Health (MH).

References

Antomonov MYu. [Mathematical processing and analysis of medical and biological data]. 2nd ed. Кyiv: Medynform; 2018. 579 p. Russian.

Amirdzhanova VN, Goryachev DV, Korshunov NI, et al. [Population indicators of quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire. Results of a multicenter study of the quality of life MIRA]. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2008;1:36-48. Russian.

Moroz VM, Makarov SYu, Serebrennikova OA, Serheta IV. [Educational stress and psychophysiological criteria for assessing the adaptation capabilities of the body of students of higher medical education institutions]. Vinnytsia: TOV “TVORY”; 2020. 184 p. Ukrainian.

Moroz VM, Serebrennikova OA, Cerheta IV, Stoian NV. [Psychophysiological and psychohygienic ba-ses of effective use of health-preserving technologies in institutions of higher education]. Vinnytsia: TOV “TVORY”; 2021. 208 p. Ukrainian.

Serheta IV, Bardov VH, Drezhenkova IL, Panchuk OIu. [Hygienic norms of motor activity of students of higher medical education institutions and ways of its optimization]. Vinnytsia: TOV “TVORY”; 2020. 184 p. Ukrainian.

Serheta IV, Panchuk OIu, Yavorovskyi OP. [Hygienic diagnosis of the professional suitability of students of medical education institutions (on the example of dental specialties)]. Vinnytsia: TOV “TVORY”; 2020. 348 p. Ukrainian.

Tymoshchuk OV, Polka NS, Serheta IV. [Scientific basis of a complex hygienic assessment of the quality of life and adaptation possibilities of modern pupils and students]. Vinnytsia: TOV “TVORY”; 2020. 272 p. Ukrainian.

Afsar ST. Impact of the Quality of Work-Life on Organizational Commitment: A Comparative Study on Academicians Working for State and Foundation. Isg J Ind Relat Hum Resour. 2015;17;45-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.4026/1303-2860.2015.0278.x

Khairunneezam MN, Siti Suriani O, Nurul Na-dirah AH. Work-Life Balance Satisfaction among Academics in Public Higher Educational Sector. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2017;7:5-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i13/3181

Cheung YB, Yeo KK, Chong KJ, Khoo EY, Wee HL. Measurement equivalence of the English, Chi-nese and Malay versions of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2019;17;67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1130-0

Omorou AY, Langlois J, Lecomte E, Briançon S, Vuillemin А. Cumulative and bidirectional association of physical activity and sedentary behaviour with health-related quality of life in adolescents. Quality of Life Research. 2016;25(5):1169-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1172-7

Ramon-Arbues E, Gea-Caballero V, Granada-Lopez JM, Juarez-Vela R, Pellicer-Garcia B, Anton-So-lanas I. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress and their associated factors in college students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7001. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197001

Sanchez HM, Sanchez EG, Barbosa MA, Guima-raes EC, Porto CC. Impact of health on quality of life and quality of working life of university teachers from different areas of knowledge. Cien Saude Colet. 2019;24:4111-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182411.28712017

Singh OP, Singh SK. Quality of Work Life of Teachers Working in Higher Educational Institutions: A Strategic Approach towards Teacher’s Excellence. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Manag Stud. 2015;3:180-6.

Sjøgaard JR. Christensen JB, Justesen JB, et al. Exercise is more than medicine: the working age population’s well-being and productivity. J of Sport and Health Science. 2016;5(2):159-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.04.004