Segmental ischemia and indocyanine green navigation: impact on perioperative parameters in laparoscopic vs. open partial nephrectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.4.294040Keywords:
renal tumor, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, indocyanine greenAbstract
The aim of this study is to compare perioperative parameters of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in renal tumor management, and to evaluate the effect of using novel method of indocyanine green navigation in segmental ischemia on these parameters. The prospective study included 455 patients (89 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies, 366 open partial nephrectomies). Sub-groups (n=39, 32, 18) in Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy employed diverse ischemia techniques, including full warm ischemia, segmental ischemia with indocyanine green navigation and segmental ischemia without navigation. Parameters assessed encompassed estimated blood loss, operative time, warm ischemia time, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate. Covariate-balancing propensity scores ensured homogeneity. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, for two matched groups. Two-sided p-values were reported for all statistical tests, a p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The findings of the conducted research indicate that open partial nephrectomy has revealed significant differences in estimated blood loss, operative time, and warm ischemia time, in favor of open partial nephrectomy. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy offers advantages in preserving renal function and minimizing estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate decline compared to open partial nephrectomy. The utilization indocyanine green navigation, facilitates precise and limited ischemia, contributing to enhanced preservation of renal function. Surgeons must weigh these considerations for optimal renal tumor management.
References
Pallagani L, Choudhary GR, Pandey H, Madduri VKS, Singh M, Gupta P, et al. Epidemiology and Cli-nicopathological Profile of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review from Tertiary Care Referral Centre. Journal of Kidney Cancer and VHL. 2021;8(1):1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i1.154
Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update. Eur Urol. 2022;82(4):399-410. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006
Zhang Y, Ellinger J. Clinical studies applying cytokine-induced killer cells for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2020;12(9):2471. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092471
Fetahu A, Cuni X, Haxhiu I, Cuni L, Manxhuka S, Shahini L. Open Nephron Sparing Surgery for T1a Renal Tumors: Clinical Experience in an Emerging Country. Gulf J Oncolog. 2019;1(31):60-5. PMID: 31591992
Bray G, Bahadori A, Mao D, Ranasinghe S, Tracey C. Benefits of Robotic Assisted vs. Traditional Lapa-roscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Single Surgeon Compa-rative Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(23):6974. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236974
O'Connor E, Timm B, Lawrentschuk N, Ischia J. Open partial nephrectomy: current review. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):3149-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-474
Yu Y, Wang W, Xiong Z, et al. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Different Complexity Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:7455-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S324457
Campbell SC, Uzzo RG, Karam JA, et al. Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Evaluation, Manage-ment, and Follow-up: AUA Guideline: Part II. J Urol. 2021;206(2):209-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001912
Antonelli A, Minervini A, Sandri M, et al. Below Safety Limits, Every Unit of Glomerular Filtration Rate Counts: Assessing the Relationship between Renal Function and Cancer-specific Mortality in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2018;74(5):661-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.029
Ishiyama Y, Kondo T, Tachibana H, Yoshida K, Takagi T, Iizuka J, et al. Limited impact of warm ischemic threshold for partial nephrectomy in the robotic surgery era: A propensity score matching study. International Journal of Urology. 2021;28(12):1219-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14674
Basatac C, Akpinar H. ‘Trifecta’ outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Results of the ‘low volume’ surgeon. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(6):943-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0396
Gandi C, Totaro A, Bientinesi R, et al. Purely Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: Robotic Approach Better than Open Using a Pentafecta Outcome with Propensity Score Matching. J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6241. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216241
Wang R, Tang J, Chen Y, Fang Z, Shen J. The cli-nical value of indocyanine green fluorescence navigation system for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the case of complex renal clear cell carcinoma (R.E.N.A.L score>/=7). J Cancer. 2021;12(6):1764-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.55033
Borrego Utiel FJ, Ramirez Navarro AM, Esteban de la Rosa R, Bravo Soto JA. Comparison of MDRD and the old CKD-EPI equations with the new CKD-EPI equations in kidney transplant patients when glomerular filtration rate is measured with 51Cr-EDTA. Nefrologia. 2020;40(1):53-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2019.07.006
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classifica-tion of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Kartal I, Karakoyunlu N, Cakici MC, Karabacak O, Sagnak L, Ersoy H. Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46(3):341-50.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865
Diana P, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, Dell’Oglio P, Mazzone E, Porter J, et al. The Role of Intraoperative Indocyanine Green in Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Results from a Large, Multi-institutional Series. European Urology. 2020;78(5):743-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.040
Hinata N, Shiroki R, Tanabe K, Eto M, Takenaka A, Kawakita M, et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrec-tomy versus standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumor: A prospective multi-institutional study. Int J Urol. 2021;28(4):382-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14469
Garg H, Tiwari D, Nayak B, et al. A comparative analysis of various surgical approaches of nephron-sparing surgery and correlation of histopathological grade with RENAL nephrometry score in renal cell carcinoma. J Minim Access Surg. 2020;16(2):144-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_208_18
Gill IS, Patil MB, et al. Zero ischemia anatomical partial nephrectomy: a novel approach. J Urol. 2012;187(3):807-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.146
Qian J, Jiang J, Li P, Zhang S, et al. Factors In-fluencing the Feasibility of Segmental Artery Clamping During Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrec-tomy. Urology. 2019;129:92-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.024
Ruiz Guerrero E, Claro AVO, Ledo Cepero MJ, Soto Delgado M, Álvarez-Ossorio Fernández JL. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy in the New Era: Systematic Review. Cancers. 2023;15(6):1793. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061793
Boga MS, Sönmez MG. Long-term renal function following zero ischemia partial nephrectomy. Research and Reports in Urology. 2019;11:43-52. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S174996
Gadus L, Kocarek J, Chmelik F, Matejkova M, Heracek J. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Navigation. Contrast Media & Mol Imaging. 2020;2020:1287530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1287530
Cignoli D, Fallara G, Re C, Cei F, Musso G, Ba-sile G, et al. Influences of Age and Comorbidities on Indication for Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review. Kidney Cancer. 2023;7(1):49-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-230001
Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential Medical Statistics. 2nd Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford; 2003. р. 420-1.
Gandi C, Totaro A, Bientinesi R, Marino F, Pierconti F, Russo A, et al. Purely Off-Clamp Partial Nephrec-tomy: Robotic Approach Better than Open Using a Pentafecta Outcome with Propensity Score Matching. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022 Jan;11(21):6241. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216241
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Medicni perspektivi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.