Comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2025.1.325350Ключові слова:
hysterectomy, intrathecal opioids, epidural analgesia, pain, analgesiaАнотація
The article reviews the comparison of opioid-limiting anesthesia methods in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of the study was to improve the method of anesthesia in the early postoperative period by reducing the dose of opioids, using 100 μg of morphine intrathecally. The quality of the perioperative period was analyzed in terms of inflammation, analgesia and comfort of women. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups with different anesthesia methods: group I: endotracheal anesthesia – 25 women; group II: endotracheal anesthesia + epidural analgesia – 28 women; group III: endotracheal anesthesia + intrathecal morphine – 19 women; group IV: endotracheal anesthesia + intrathecal morphine + epidural anesthesia – 19 women. The following results were obtained: Leukocytes after surgery: (17.32 [14.48; 20.11]), (13.65 [11.27; 15.72]), (15.4 [13.4; 18.47]), (15.36 [13.47; 18.4]), which is significantly lower in group II, pI-IV =0.037. The next day: a statistically significant difference is observed between groups I and II-IV, pI-IV =0.047; after 3 days – no significant difference between the groups was detected, pI-IV >0.05. Patients of the first group required intramuscular morphine in 56% of cases, while patients of the second group – 21.4%, patients of the third group – 15.7%, and in the fourth group 0% – a significant difference (pI-IV =0.004). The pain index (M±m) on the visual analog scale after awakening (3.9±0.2); (1.4±0.3), (3.2±0.2); (0.7±0.1) – lower in the second and, especially, the fourth group pI-IV =0.001; after 3 hours – lower in the second and fourth groups, pI-IV =0.01; after 6 – lower in the third and fourth groups, pI-IV = 0.029; further, a statistical difference is observed in the decrease in the scores on the visual analog scale in the third and fourth groups. The time of the first need for analgesia (M±m) in group I was 1.8±0.2 hours, while in group II it was 2.8±0.2 hours, in group 3 it was 2.0±0.2 hours, while in group 4 it was 5.7±0.3 hours, which significantly prolongs the time of the first need for analgesia for group IV, p=0.0001. Therefore, after analyzing the data, we can conclude that the combination of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia is optimal for providing effective anesthesia.
Посилання
Cliby WA. Total abdominal hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(4):295-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80051-X
Chale GJ, Salim RM, Leshabari KM. Clinical indications for total abdominal hysterectomy among women seen in Dar es Salaam regional referral hospitals, Tanzania: a prospective, observational hospital-based study. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:10. doi: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2021.38.10.17695
Aarts JWMA, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BWJ, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;8:CD003677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5
Han Y, Han L, Dong M, Sun Q, Ding K, Zhang Z, et al. Comparison of a loading dose of dexmedetomidine combined with propofol or sevoflurane for hemodynamic changes during anesthesia maintenance: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0468-x
Niu Z, Gao X, Shi Z, Liu T, Wang M, Guo L, Qi D. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia or inhalation anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;68:110374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110374
Kehlet H, Werner MU. Intrathecal hydrophilic opioids for abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and trial sequential analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020;125(3):358-372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.061
Kunst AM, Wulf H, Stegemann B, Fiehn A. Intra-operative guidance of anesthesia: Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) vs. standard care for hysterectomy under anesthesia with sevoflurane: A randomized controlled simple blinded study on intraoperative opioid con-sumption, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction. Die Anaesthesiologie. 2023;72(7):477-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01288-y
Shen C, Panda S, Vogelstein JT. The Chi-Square Test of Distance Correlation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 2021;31(1):254-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2021.1938585
Mishra P, Pandey CM, Singh U, Gupta A, Sahu C, Keshri A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann Card Anaesth. 2019;22(1):67-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Kim TK. T-test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015;68(6):540-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540
Paudel R, Dogra P, Montgomery-Yates AA, Coz Yataco A. Procalcitonin: A promising tool or just another overhyped test? Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(3):332-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.39367
Moutachakkir M, Hanchi AL, Baraou A, Boukhira A, Chellak S. Immunoanalytical characteristics of C-reactive protein and high sensitivity C-reactive protein. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2017;75(2):225-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2017.1232
Dexter F. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test used for data that are not normally distributed. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(3):537-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829ed28f
Le Guen M, Jeanne M, Sievert K, et al. The analgesia nociception index: a pilot study to evaluate a new pain parameter during labor. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:146-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.01.001
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
Meylan N, et al. Benefit and risk of intrathecal morphine without local anaesthetic in patients undergoing major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009;102(2):156-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen368
O'Neill A, Lirk P. Multimodal Analgesia. Anesthesiology Clinics. 2022;40(Iss 3):455-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2022.04.002
Fallon F, Moorthy A, Skerritt C, Crowe GG, Bug-gy DJ. Latest Advances in Regional Anaesthesia. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 28;60(5):735. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050735
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
Як цитувати
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2025 Медичні перспективи

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.