Rehabilitation of a patient with manifestations of intolerance to dental materials in the oral cavity (clinical case)

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2025.2.333658

Ключові слова:

biocompatibility, individual sensitivity, material intolerance, tests

Анотація

Signi­ficant achievements in modern dental materials science, improvements in all-ceramic technologies, microprosthetics, and inert removable prosthetics have not eliminated the relevance of assessing the biocompatibility of dental construction materials with the tissues of the prosthetic bed. Currently, almost 47% of the global population suffers from food, drugs, various materials, and chemical compounds intolerances. Aim of the study – to present a clinical case of intolerance to structural materials, and to demonstrate the prediction and prevention of their adverse effects on the whole organism through biocompatibility testing with the tissues of the prosthetic bed. A 62-years-old male patient sought prosthodontic care with complaints of pain, bleeding, redness, and swelling at the sites where metal-ceramic crowns contacted the oral mucosa, along with itching, burning sensations, and halitosis. Approximately two weeks after fixing the bridge prostheses, skin rashes appeared on the neck, accompanied by itching and tingling sensations. Given that the patient associated symptom onset with the fixation of full-cast metal-ceramic bridges, and based on the clinical picture in the oral cavity and results of epicutaneous patch testing, a diagnosis was established: “Intolerance to dental materials. Localized periodontitis complicated by Kennedy Class II, Subclass 2 maxillary and Class I, Subclass 1 mandibular edentulous areas. Masticatory efficiency loss according to Agapov – 84%.” Due to positive patch test results and clinical findings, removal of the metal-ceramic constructions from the oral cavity was deemed necessary. After extraction of all mobile teeth and their destroyed roots, it was planned to restore the edentulous spaces with zirconia bridge prostheses and fabricate clasp dentures based on polyamide for both jaws.

Посилання

Schmalz G, Watts DC, Darvell BW. Dental materials science: research, testing and standards. Dent Mater. 2021;37(3):379-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2021.01.027

Arakelyan M, Spagnuolo G, Iaculli F, Dikopova N, Antoshin A, Timashev P, et al. Minimization of adverse effects associated with dental alloys. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(21):7476. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217476

Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Agache I, Bedbrook A, Akdis CA, Canonica GW, et al. ARIA‐EAACI care pathways for allergen immunotherapy in respiratory allergy. Clinical and Translational Allergy. 2021;11(4):e12014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12014

Domic I, Budmir J, Novak I, Mravak-Stipetic M, Lugovic-Mihic L. Assessment of allergies to food and addi¬tives in patients with angioedema, burning mouth syndrome, cheilitis, gingivostomatitis, oral lichenoid reac-tions, and perioral dermatitis. Acta Clin Croat. 2021;60(2):276-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2021.60.02.14

Schmalz G, Jakubovics N, Schwendicke F. Normative approaches for oral health: standards, specifi-cations, and guidelines. J Dent Res. 2022;101(5):489-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211049695

Budimir J, Mravak-Stipetic M, Bulat V, Fercek I, Japundzic I, Lugovic-Mihic L. Allergic reactions in oral and perioral diseases-what do allergy skin test results show? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(1):40-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.08.001

Itoh E, Furumura M, Furue M. Rate of actual metal allergy prior to dental treatment in subjects complaining of possible metal allergy. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020;38(3):186-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.12932/ap-241018-0425

Gryzodub DV, Gryzodub VI, Gryzodub YeV, vy-nakhidnyky; Kharkivska medychna akademiia pisliadyplomnoi osvity MOZ Ukrainy, patentovlasnyk. [Method for determining individual sensitivity to dental materials]. Patent Ukrainy No. 91624. 2014.04.10. Ukrainian.

Fletcher R, Harrison W, Crighton A. Dental material allergies and oral soft tissue reactions. Br Dent J. 2022;232(9):620-25.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4195-9

Sokolovska V, Tsvetkova N, Davydenko V, Pysarenko O, Tarashevska Y. Dental rehabilitation of a patient with a decrease in bite height due to pathological abrasion of hard tooth tissues (clinical case). Medicni Perspektivi. 2024;(29):245-53.

doi: https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2024.2.307778

Sokolovska V, Tsvetkova N. [Displays of unbea-rableness of stomatological materials are in cavity of mouth (clinical case)]. Ukr Dent Alm. 2022;4:48-52. Ukrainian.

doi: https://doi.org/10.31718/2409-0255.4.2022.08

Alarcon-Sanchez MA, Heboyan A, Fernan-des GVO, Castro-Alarcon N, Romero-Castro NS. Potential impact of prosthetic biomaterials on the periodontium: a comprehensive review. Molecules. 2023;28(3):1075. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031075

Forkel S, Schubert S, Corvin L, Heine G, Lang CCV, Oppel E, et al. Contact allergies to dental materials in patients. Br J Dermatol. 2024;190(6):895-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad525

Müller-Heupt LK, Schiegnitz E, Kaya S, Jacobi-Gresser E, Kämmerer PW, Al-Nawas B. Diagnostic tests for titanium hypersensitivity in implant dentistry: a sys-tematic review of the literature. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00428-0

Sousa‐Pinto B, Sa‐Sousa A, Vieira RJ, Amaral R, Klimek L, Czarlewski W, et al. Behavioural patterns in allergic rhinitis medication in Europe: A study using MASK‐air® real‐world data. Allergy. 2022;77(9):2699-711. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.15275

Can A, Karabacak DE, Yalcin BK, Demir S, Buyukozturk S, Colakoglu B, et al. How important is patch testing with dental materials in real-life clinical practice? Allergy Asthma Proc. 2023;44(2):136-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2023.44.220074

Lugovic-Mihic L, Ilic I, Budimir J, Pondeljak N, Mravak Stipetic M. Common allergies and allergens in oral and perioral diseases. Acta Clin Croat. 2020;59(2):318-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2020.59.02.16

Forkel S, Schubert S, Corvin L, Heine G, Lang CCV, Oppel E, et al. Contact allergies to dental materials in patients. Br J Dermatol. 2024;190(6):895-903. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljad525

Bacchi A, Cesar PF. Advances in ceramics for dental applications. Dent Clin North Am. 2022 Oct;66(4):591-602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2022.05.007

Muntian LM, Kulyhin OB. [Dynamics of biophysical and biochemical changes in oral fluid parameters during orthopedic treatment of patients with fixed dentures and their prognostic significance]. Novyny stomatolohii. 2010;1:47-51. Ukrainian.

Zemelka-Wiacek M. Metal Allergy: State-of-the-art mechanisms, biomarkers, hypersensitivity to implants. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):6971. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236971

Kilic K, Koc AN, Tekinsen FF, Yildiz P, Kilic D, Zararsiz G, et al. Assessment of Candida species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in barand locator-retained overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40(5):549-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00048

Brown A, Mandelberg NJ, Munoz-Mendoza D, Palys V, Schalock PC, Mogilner A, et al. Allergy considerations in implanted neuromodulation devices. Neuro-modulation. 2021;24(8):1307-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.13332

Grizodub DV. [Analysis of the frequency of somatic complications in patients with intolerance to constructional dental materials and with fixed bridge pro-stheses]. Problemy bezperervnoi medychnoi osvity ta nauky. 2019;(1):64-7. Ukrainian.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2025-06-27

Як цитувати

1.
Davydenko V, Davydenko H, Sokolovska V, Khilinich Y, Tarashevska Y. Rehabilitation of a patient with manifestations of intolerance to dental materials in the oral cavity (clinical case). Med. perspekt. [інтернет]. 27, Червень 2025 [цит. за 05, Грудень 2025];30(2):171-9. доступний у: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/333658

Номер

Розділ

КЛІНІЧНА МЕДИЦИНА