High-risk thrombosis of a mechanical aortic valve: successful thrombolysis as a bridge or an alternative to surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2025.4.348922Keywords:
prosthetic valve thrombosis, thrombolysis, mechanical aortic valve, ESC guidelines, high-risk surgery, case reportAbstract
Thrombosis of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis is a rare, yet potentially life-threatening complication that demands urgent recognition, rapid diagnostic evaluation, and immediate therapeutic intervention. We describe a detailed clinical case of a 52-year-old male patient who developed critical thrombosis of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis despite maintaining an adequate and well-controlled anticoagulant regimen. The patient presented with profound hemodynamic instability, markedly reduced ejection fraction, and clinical manifestations consistent with acute decompensated heart failure. On physical and instrumental examination, his condition corresponded to ASA class IV, with a calculated surgical risk of EuroSCORE II=17.28%, indicating an extremely high perioperative mortality risk. Considering both the elevated risk of surgical re-intervention and the rapidly worsening heart failure, the multidisciplinary team decided to initiate systemic thrombolytic therapy as a life-saving alternative. Thrombolysis was performed according to an accelerated protocol using intravenous alteplase at a total dose of 100 mg. Within the first hour of infusion, echocardiography revealed a clear positive trend – restoration of leaflet mobility, a notable reduction in the transprosthetic gradient, and significant improvement in myocardial contractility. Subsequent management continued in the intensive care unit with careful hemodynamic and laboratory monitoring. The patient was discharged on the eighth day in a stable condition, free of complications. Follow-up echocardiography two months later confirmed normal and sustained function of the mechanical prosthesis. This case illustrates the high efficacy of systemic thrombolysis as a viable and guideline-supported (ESC/EACTS 2021, Class I, Level B) therapeutic option when surgical treatment is contraindicated or technically impossible.
References
Roudaut R, Serri K, Lafitte S. Thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves: diagnosis and therapeutic considerations. Heart. 2007 Jan;93(1):137-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.071183
Özkan M, Gündüz S, et al. Thrombolysis or surgery in patients with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(5):532-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.027
De Roeck F, Abdulmajid L, Haine S. Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis complicated by left main coronary artery bifurcation embolism: Case report and review of literature. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2021 Jul;28 Suppl:72-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2021.03.021
Chopard R, Meneveau N. Surgery versus thrombolytic therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis (review). J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(8):e035143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035143
Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. European heart journal. 2022;43(7):561-632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
Serban A, Dadarlat-Pop A, Achim A, et al. Diagnosis of Left‑Sided Mechanical Prosthetic Valve Throm-bosis: A Pictorial Review. J Pers Med. 2023 Jun;13(6):967. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060967
Güner A, Kalçık M,∙Kalkan S,∙Özkan M. Management of Obstructive Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis: Thrombolytic Therapy or Anticoagulation? The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2021;37(6):938.e7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2021.01.026
Zoghbi WA, Jone P-N, Chamsi-Pasha MA,∙Chen T, Collins KA, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of prosthetic valve function with cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2024;37(4):355-420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2023.10.004
Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(4):734-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(36):3599-726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368
Seshagiri RD, Srinivasan KN, Sathyamurthy I. Low-dose alteplase in prosthetic valve thrombosis. Indian Heart J. 2022;74(3):210-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihjccr.2022.03.005
Amado-Rodríguez L, Rodríguez-Garcia R, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Madotto F, et al. Mechanical ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema. J Intensive Care. 2022;10:13.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00648-x
Graham F, Dobbin S, Sooriyakanthan M, Tsang W. Evolving standards in prosthetic heart valve assessment. Struct Heart. 2024 Nov 30;9(4):100372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shj.2024.100372
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Medicni perspektivi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.



