Analysis of structure of lumbar spine dorsopathy morbidity in able-bodied age patients.

Authors

  • M. V. Manin
  • V. V. Abramov
  • O. B. Nekhanevich
  • P. A. Khaitov
  • N. I. Kaptelov
  • I. V. Sysenko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2015.2.45682

Keywords:

lumbar spine dorsopathy, rehabilitation, medical physical culture

Abstract

The analysis of structure of lumbar spine dorsopathy morbidity among able-bodied population of the Dnepropetrovsk area for substantiation of differentiated approach to the choice of exercise therapy methods was a research objective. The structure of dorsopathy morbidity in 371 patients in 2009-2013 period is analysed in the work. The paper presents analysis of the most frequent morphological changes in the structures of the spine, their localization and clinical course. Link of clinical manifestations of dorsopathy with structural changes of the backbone, the disease experience is revealed, efficiency of rehabilitation by means of physiotherapy exercises depending on qualitative and quantitative signs of disease is defined. Results of the research specify that more than 40% of patients were on repeated treatment, clinical manifestation in 62% of patients was observed at the most able-bodied age (from 30 to 50 years), according to the disease experience number of aggravations per a year increased, in 57,5% of cases administration of medical physical culture was limited due to development of an accompanying pathology, in 40% of cases against positive dynamics of painful syndrome insufficient changes in volume of movements of the spine segments throughout treatment were marked. It testifies to necessity of working out algorithm of differentiated approach to the choice of means medical physical culture in treatment of lumbar spine dorsopathy.

Author Biographies

M. V. Manin

SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine» 
department of physical rehabilitation, sports medicine and valeology
Dzerzhinsky str., 9, Dnipropetrovsk, 49044, Ukraine

V. V. Abramov

SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine» 
department of physical rehabilitation, sports medicine and valeology
Dzerzhinsky str., 9, Dnipropetrovsk, 49044, Ukraine

O. B. Nekhanevich

SE «Dnipropetrovsk medical academy of Health Ministry of Ukraine» 
department of physical rehabilitation, sports medicine and valeology
Dzerzhinsky str., 9, Dnipropetrovsk, 49044, Ukraine

P. A. Khaitov

CE «Dnepropetrovsk regional clinic named after I.I. Mechnikova»
October`s sq. 14, Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine

N. I. Kaptelov

CE «Dnepropetrovsk regional clinic named after I.I. Mechnikova» 
October`s sq. 14, Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine

I. V. Sysenko

CE «Dnepropetrovsk regional clinic named after I.I. Mechnikova» 
October`s sq. 14, Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine

References

Epifanov VA, Epifanov AV. [Osteochondrosis (diagnosis, treatment and prevention): A Guide for Phy¬sicians]. Мoscow: «Medpress-inform». 2004;272. Russian. 2. Epifanov VA. [Osteochondrosis of spine]. Fiz¬kul'¬tura v profilaktike, lechenii i reabilitatsii. 2005;2(11):26-34. Russian. 3. Zhuk PM, Stel'makh IN, Nychik AZ. [Osteo¬chondrosis of spine. Treatment and prevention]. Kiev: «Kniga-plyus». 2003;140. Russian. 4. Zhulev NM, Badzgaradze YuD, Zhulev SN. [Osteochondrosis: A Guide for Physicians]. St. Peter¬sburg: Izdatel'stvo Lan'. 2001;592. Russian. 5. Mendel' OI, Nikiforov AS. [Degenerative disea¬ses of the spine, their complications and treatment]. Rus¬skiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2006;14(4):34-39. Russian. 6. Smirnov AYu, Shtul'man DR, Evzikov G.Yu. [Lumbar stenosis. Literature review and analysis of our own observations]. Nevrologicheskiy zhurnal. 1998;4:27-31. Russian. 7. Shtok VP, Levin OS, editors. [Reference to formu¬late a clinical diagnosis of the nervous system of diseases]. Мoscow: МIА. 2006;520. Russian. 8. Khalafyan AA. [STATISTICA 6. Statistic ana¬lysis]. Moscow. «Binom-Press». 2007;512. Russian. 9. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal H. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine. 2000;25:1424-36. 10. Malmivaara A, Slatis P, Heliovaara M. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine. 2007;32:1-8. 11. Mense S. Pathophysiology of low back pain and transition to the chronic state – experimental data and new concepts. Schmerz. Der. 2001;15:413-20. 12. Tadokoro K, Miyamoto H, Shimomura T. The prognosis of conservative treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of patients over 70 years of age. Spine. 2005;30:2458-63. 13. Wasiak R, Kim J, Pransky G. Work disability and costs caused by recurrence of low back pain: lon¬ger and mo¬re costly than in first episodes. Spine. 2006;31(2):219-25. 14. Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010. Annals of Rheumatic Disease. 2000;59:81-2.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-08

How to Cite

1.
Manin MV, Abramov VV, Nekhanevich OB, Khaitov PA, Kaptelov NI, Sysenko IV. Analysis of structure of lumbar spine dorsopathy morbidity in able-bodied age patients. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2015Jun.8 [cited 2024Nov.13];20(2):131-6. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/45682

Issue

Section

SOCIAL MEDICINE