Hemispheric asymmetry of the brain as a psycho-physiological basis of individual and typological features of the formation of a sense of humour.

Authors

  • O. N. Shportun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2016.2.72129

Keywords:

functional asymmetry of brain hemispheres, the physiological peculiaritiesof personality, sense of humor

Abstract

The article describes the psycho-physiological peculiarities of hemispheric asymmetry of the brain as the basis of individual and typological features of the formation of a sense of humour. The analysis of the impact of the functional brain hemispheric asymmetry on emotional, intellectual and physiological features of development of sense of humour in ontogeny is conducted. Analysis of studies of inter-hemispheric asymmetry of the brain makes it possible to ascertain the impact of the functioning of each hemisphere on the formation of the perception of humour. Studies show that in the process of developing of sense of humour, two functional hemispheres of the brain are involved. As the emotion of humour – is an intellectual emotion, and in the development of intelligence a lot of mental processes are involved, in the formation of humour two hemispheres of the brain are functioned. The right hemisphere is responsible for the emotional nature of humour (intonation, sound level of language, speed of response to a joke ...), the left hemisphere – for processing verbal information (content of the joke, category, purpose, content analysis ...). After analysing the research of hemispheric functional asymmetry of the human brain, its psycho-physiological and neurochemical characteristics, it can be assumed that people with more developed left hemisphere in perceiving humour are more prone to displays of gelotophilia and “right hemisphere” people – show signs of gelotophobia and katagelasticism. Examining gender differences of hemisphere asymmetry of the brain, it can be argued that diagnosing sense of humour is important to take into account gender-specific functioning of hemispheres, because men have more clearly functioning the left hemisphere, and women – the right one. This fact of sexual peculiarities of functioning of inter-hemispheric asymmetry of the brain allows diagnosing objectively sense of humour, as well as different variations of the human psyche.

Author Biography

O. N. Shportun

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Volodymyrska St., 60, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

References

Amunts VV. [To question about asymmetry of structural organization of the brain of men and women. Functional inter-hemispheric asymmetry. Reader]. / Ed. N.N. Bogolepov, V.F. Fokin. M.: Nauchnyi mir. 2004;214-9. Russian.

Balonov LYa. [Functional asymmetry of brain in the organization of speech activity. Sensor system. Sensor processes in the asymmetry of hemispheres]. Leningrad: Nauka. 2009;99-114. Russian.

Bezrukih MM. [Psychophysiology: Dictionary]. M.: «PER SE». 2006;128. Russian.

Belyj BI. [Features of information processing in the right and left hemisphere of the brain of man]. Zhurnal of nevropatologii i psihiatrii. 1982;7:131-8. Russian.

Bianki VL. [Asymmetry of animal’s brain]. L.M.:VLADOS, 2001;295. Russian.

Blejher VM. [Dictionary of psichoterminology]. M.: Sfera. 1975;486. Russian.

Verbina GG. [Psychology of emotions]: Stud. Manual. Chuvash. University. Cheboksary. 2008;308. Russian.

Volf NV. [Sexual dimorphism of the functional organization of the brain in the processing of speech information. Functional interhemispheric asymmetry: Reader.] Ed. NN Bogolepov, VS Fokin. M.: Nauchnyi mir. 2004;386-410. Russian.

Geodokyan VA. [Asynchronous asymmetry]. Zhurnal vyshhoi nervnoi dejatelnosti. 2013;43(3):543-61. Russian.

Geodokian VA. [Evolutionary theory of asym-metry in organisms, the brain and the body]. Uspehi fiziol. Nauki. 2005;36(1);24-53. Russian.

Golubev VL. [Psychosocial factors, gender and pain]. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psihiatrii. 2004;11:70-73. Russian.

Goroshko EI. [Functional asymmetry of brain, language, gender: an analytical review]. М.-Kh.: «INZHEK». 2005;280. Russian.

Denisova ZV. [Mechanisms of child emotional behavior]. L.: Nauka, 2007;143. Russian.

Dobrohotova TA. [About the language of descri-bing the functional asymmetry of brain]. M.: Collection reports of the 1st international Conference in memory of A.R. Luriia. 2004;108-14. Russian.

Dobrohotova TA. [The methodological value of the principle of symmetry in the studying of the fun¬c-tional organization of the person. Functional inter¬he¬mi-spheric asymmetry: Reader]. Ed. NN Bogolepov, VF Fo-kin. M.: Nauchnyi mir. 2004;15-47. Russian.

Yegorov AYu. [Functional asymmetry of the brain and the importance of the development of the clinical direction in evolutionary Physiology. Trends of development of physiological Sciences]. S-P. Nauka. 2006;159-78. Russian.

Zhukov DA. [Biological basis of behavior. Hu-moral mechanisms].SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. 2004;455. Russian.

Ivanov VV. [Even and noneven number: asym-metry of brain and sign systems] К.: VMYRoL, 2004;185. Russian.

Ilin YeP. [Differential psychophysiology of men and women]. SPb.: Piter. 2007;544. Russian.

Kjuri P. [Selected works]. Per.s fr. N Andreeva, I Rusakova, K Shaposhnikova, L Sazonova, Ed. N Andre-eva, L Sazonova. М, L.: Nauka. 1966;399. Russian.

Lurija AR. [Basics of Nneuropsychology]. M.: Akademija. 2006;384. Russian.

Nozdracheva AD. [The basics of the Physiology: a textbook for universities]. SPb.: Lan. 2001;1088. Russian.

Paliienko ІA. [Lateral ttherapy of inner illnesses]. Ukr. Med. Chasopys. 2007;2(58):597. Ukrainian.

Prunch Erich. [The path of development of western translation studies. From language asymmetries to political]. М.: 2015;512. Russian.

Rotenberg V. [Brain strategy of hemispheres]. Sotsionika, psikhologija i mezhlichnostnyje otnoshenija: a person, team, society. 2007;3:21-26. Russian.

Rebrova NP. [Functional asymmetry of the man brain and mental processes]. SPb.: Rech. 2004;80. Russian.

Simernitskaya EG. [Dominance of hemispheres]. М.: Mosk. Un-ta. 1987;95. Russian.

[Sensomotored lateral profile: testing and inter-pretation. Physiology of person]. Chernihovskaya TV, Ga¬vrilova TA, Voinov AB, Strelnikov KN. 2005;35-44. Russian.

Springer S. [Left brain, right brain]. М.: Mir. 2003;256. Russian.

Tartakovskaja I. [Biological aspects and policy interpretation: we fell mercilessly into women and men]. M.: Zvenia. 2006;260. Russian.

Tvorogova ND. [Clinical Psychology]. M.: PER SE. 2007;345. Russian.

Anishhenko TG, Glushkovskaja- Semjachkina OB, Shorina LN, Igosheva NB. [Physiology of higher nervous activity]. Saratov: UNTs «Kolledzh». 2001;96. Russian.

Feynman Richard. [Physics of social environ-ments. М.: Librokom. 2015;7:288. Russian.

Fols K. [The origin of life. Small warm pond]. M.: Librokom. 1982;248. Russian.

Fokin VF. [Evolutional aspect of central and peripheral organization of functional hemispheric asym-metry]. M.: Nauka. 2004;48. Russian.

KhomskayaYeD. [Neuropsychology]. S-P.: 4ed. 2010;496. Russian.

Chuprikov AP. [The world of lefthanded]. K.: Institute of neuropsychiatry, 2005;88. Ukrainian.

Chuprikov AP. [Lateral therapy]. K.: Zdorovia, 1996;176. Ukrainian.

Annett M. (1985) Left, right hand and brain: the right shift theory. Erlbaum Press, New-Jersey, 190.

Annett M. Handedness and cerebral dominance: the right shift theory. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci., 1998;10(4):459-69.

Annett M. Hand preference observed in large healthy samples: classification, norms and interpretations of increased non-right-handedness by the right shift theory. Brit. J. Clin. Psychol., 2004;95(3): 339–53.

42. Bakan, Dibb G, Reed P. Handedness and birth stress. Neuropsychologia, 1973;11(3):363–6.

Bakan P, Putman W. Right-left determination and brain lateralisation. Sex differences. Arch. Neurol. (Chic.), 1974;30:334-5.

Gazzaniga MS. The bisected brain. Appleton, New York, 2008;172.

Laland KN, Kumm, Van horn JD, Feldman MW. A gene-culture model of human handedness. Behav. Genet., 1995;25(5):433-45.

Levy J. Interhemispheric collaboration: single-mindedness in asymmetric brain. In: C. Best (Ed.) He-mispheric function and collaboration in the child. CTNY Acad. Press, 1985;11-32.

Levy J, Nagylaki TA. Model for the genetics of handedness. Genetics, 2008;72(1):117-28.

McGlone J. Sex Difference in the Human Brain Asymmetry: a Critical Survey. Behav. and Brain Sci. 1980;3(2)215-63.

Harris LJ. Sex Differences in Spatial Ability. Asym¬metry of the Function of the Brain. (Ed. Kempbel). L.: Cambridge; 1978.

Swaab D. Sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior // Best Practice & Research Clinical Endo-crinology & Metabolism. 2007;21(3):431-44.

Wada JA, Clark R, Hamm A. Cerebral hemi¬sphe-re asymmetry in humans. Arch. Neurol. 2007;32:239-46.

Wanger TD, Luan Phan K, Liberson I, Taylor SF. Valence, gender, and lateralization on functional brain ana¬tomy in emotion: a mete–anaysis of findings from neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 2003;P.1-19.

Witelson SF, Kigar DL. Sylvian fissure morpho-logy and asymmetry in man and women: bilateral dif-ferences in relation to handedness in men. Comp. Neurol. 2003;323:326-40.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Shportun ON. Hemispheric asymmetry of the brain as a psycho-physiological basis of individual and typological features of the formation of a sense of humour. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2016May31 [cited 2024May23];21(2):19-30. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/72129

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL MEDICINE