Justification of urolithiasis prevention and metaphylaxis improvement on the basis of socio-economic characteristics of patients.

Authors

  • О. Z. Detsyk
  • D. B. Solomchak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2016.3.82028

Keywords:

urolithiasis, social and economic determinants, prevention, metaphylaxis

Abstract

In order to determine the directions of urolithiasis prevention and metaphylaxis improvement there was conducted a retrospective epidemiological study of a rep­resentative sample of 443 patients (study group, 403 – without and 40 – with recurrences) and 203 patients with other, mainly acute urological pathology (control group). It was established that urolithiasis affects mainly people of the working age (75%). Prevalence of pathology increases with age (OR=3.93; 95% CI=1.64-9.44), as well as recurrences formation (2.44; 1.21-4.93) occurring in 10-20% of patients with urolithiasis older than 40 years. It was proved that social and economic burden of the disease increases with recurrent stone formation due to the increase of low well-being (3.43; 1.77-6.65), unemployment (2.26; 1.14-4.45) and disability (3.93; 1.64-9.44). Conclusion is drawn on the need of improving prevention, first of allmetaphylaxis, technologies, by sharing of responsibilities between urologists and family doctors.

Author Biographies

О. Z. Detsyk

Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University
Halytska Str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

D. B. Solomchak

Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University
Halytska Str., 2, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine

References

Borzhiyevskyy ATS, Vozianov SO. [Urolithiasis: (urological aspects)]. Lviv: Publishing House "Vysokyy zamok". 2007;263. Ukrainian.

Vozianov AF, Pasyechnikov SP, Saydakova NO, Dmytryshyn SP. [Dynamics of morbidity and prevalence of urolithiasis in the adult population of Ukraine]. Zdo-rovye muzhchyny. 2010;2(33):17-24. Ukrainian.

Ermolenko TI, Zupanets IA, Lisovyy VM. [The use of combined drugs in metaphylaxis of urolithiasis]. Suchasni preparaty i technologii. 2013;1(97):42-45. Ukrainian.

Solomchak DB. [Analysis of organization of dis-pensary observation of patients with urolithiasis]. Halytsky likarsky visnyk. 2015;22(1):127-30. Ukrainian.

Dirk J. Kok Metaphylaxis, diet and lifestyle in stone disease.Arab Journal of Urology. 2012;10(3):240-9.

Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, .Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Seitz C. EAU Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology.

Forthofer RN, Lee ES, Hernandez M. Biosta-tistics: A Guide to Design, Analysis, and Discovery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. 2007;502.

Mennuni G, Serio A, Fontana M, Nocchi S, Cos-tantino C, Tanzi G, Stornelli G, Fraioli A. Prevention and treatment of nephrolithiasis: a review on the role of spa therapy. Clin Ter. 2015;166(5):344-56.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-27

How to Cite

1.
Detsyk ОZ, Solomchak DB. Justification of urolithiasis prevention and metaphylaxis improvement on the basis of socio-economic characteristics of patients. Med. perspekt. [Internet]. 2016Sep.27 [cited 2024Nov.22];21(3):65-9. Available from: https://journals.uran.ua/index.php/2307-0404/article/view/82028

Issue

Section

SOCIAL MEDICINE