PROFESSIONALLY ORIENTED DISCOURSE AND STATUS – ROLE RELATIONSHIPS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TRAINEE TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.5/37.102643Keywords:
professionally oriented discourse, competence, educational type of discourse, methodological type of discourse, scientific type of discourseAbstract
On the basis of critical analysis of scientific literature professionally oriented discourse and status and role relationships between the teacher and the students and among the participants of professionally oriented communication have been characterized. The main stages of creating oral professionally oriented discourse have been analyzed. It is determined that the situation is the core element of any type of discourse.
The three phases of creating oral professionally oriented discourse have been defined: the first phase refers to the conceptualization of the discourse in the terms of its topic and purpose; it develops the senderʼs general intentions, his conceptions; the second phase of formulation involves the choice of vocabulary, grammar structures and syntax; the third phase, the articulation starts up with the actualization of the conceptual scheme.
It is noted that discourse represents a number of successive and mutually stipulated speech acts which provide some information in particular communicative situations and are formed in accordance with the specificity of their semantic and grammar organization and directed by motives and intentions of the speaker. Taking into consideration the spheres of teachersʼ communication the three types of professionally oriented discourse have been suggested. They are educational, methodological and scientific.
The content of different types of discourse has been specified. Educational discourse is implemented in the classroom and is a complex formation that covers a presentation of the new academic material, its explanation, training and practice in communicative situations, as well as monitoring and evaluating studentsʼ progress. The goal of methodological oriented type of discourse is to prepare teachers of foreign languages for professional intercultural cooperation, namely to participate in the work of teaching seminars, meetings. Scientific discourse involves the investigation of some problems concerning ther process of foreign language teaching in secondary schools and their presentation at a conference or seminar.
Status and role relationships beween the participants of every type of discourse have been defined. Teachers and students are the participants of an educational type of discourse. The relationships between them at some stages of the lesson are not equal. The participants of a methodological type of discourse are teachers and the chief methodologist of the methodological society. The teachers fulfill equal roles: one of them introduces the topic and the other continues it. The roles between the teachers and the chief methodologist are unequal. The latter submits the guidelines and initiates discussion of important issues related to the process of teaching foreign languages.
The teachers who do scientific researches are the participants of a scientific type of discourse and they fulfill equal roles. Methodology of teaching discourse on the basis of role play as well as the examples of the tasks assessing the level of professionally oriented discourse competence of future teachers have been suggested
References
Bershadska N.S. Metodychni rekomendatsii z formuvannia anhlomovnoi usnoi dyskursyvnoi kompetentsii u studentiv movnykh spetsialnostei (Methodological Recommendations for the Language Department Studentsʼ English Oral Discourse Competence Formation), Nauk. visnyk Pivdennoukrainskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni K.D. Ushynskoho, 2011, № 7 – 8, pp. 14–149. [in Ukrainian]
Budnik A.O. Formuvannia dyskursnykh umin studentiv filolohichnykh spetsialnostei zasobamy natsionalno-pretsedentnykh tekstiv (The Formation of Philological Department Studentsʼ Discourse Skills by Means of National Precedent Texts), Odesa, 2010, 258 p. [in Ukrainian]
Zimnyaya I.A. Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya (Pedagogical Psychology), Moscow, 2000, 384 p. [in Russian]
Yezhova T.V. Pedagogicheskiy diskurs i yego proektirovanie (Pedagogical Discourse and its Planning), Rezhym dostupа: http://www.eidos.ru/journal/2007/0930-5.htm. [in Russian]
Yelukhina N.V. Diskursivnaya kompetentsiya i yeye rol v ovladenii inoyazychnym professionalnym obshcheniem (Discourse Competence and its Role in Mastering Foreign Professionally Oriented Communication), Professionalnaya kommunikatsiya kak tsel obucheniya inostrannym yazykam v neyazykovom vuze, 2000, Vyp. 454, pp. 60–65. [in Russian]
Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs (Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse), Volgograd, 2002, 477 p. [in Russian]
Kubryakova Ye.S. O ponyatiyakh diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoy lingvistike (The Concepts of Discourse and Discourse Analysis in the Contemporary Linguistics), Diskurs, rech, rechevaya deyatelnost: funktsionalnye i strukturnye aspekty, Seriya «Teoriya i istoriya yazykoznaniya», 2000, pp. 5–13. [in Russian]
Kucheriava O.A. Systema roboty z formuvannia dyskursyvnoi kompetentsii u sferi pysemnoi komunikatsii (The System of Discourse Competence Formation in Writing), Rezhym dostupu: http://litmisto.org.ua/?p=19583. [in Ukrainian]
Leontyev A.N. Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost (Activities. Consciousness. Personality), Moscow, 1975, 304 p. [in Russian]
Milovanova Zh.V. Zhanrovo-rechevye osobennosti pedagogicheskogo diskursa (Genre and Speech Features of a Pedagogical Discourse), Yazykovaya lichnost: sistema, normy, stil, 1998, pp. 63–64. [in Russian]
Sosiak M.M. Komunikatyvno-movlennieva sytuatsiia yak osnova formuvannia komunikatyvnoi kompetentsii studentiv u dialohichnomu movlenni (Communicative Situation as a Foundation of Studentsʼ Communicative Competence Formation in Dialogue), Liudynoznavchi studii, Seriia «Pedahohika», 2008, pp. 211–225. [in Ukrainian]
Chernysh V.V. Teoretyko-metodychni zasady formuvannia u maibutnikh uchyteliv profesiino-oriientovanoi anhlomovnoi kompetentsii v hovorinni (Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Future Teachersʼ Professionally Oriented Competence in English Speaking Formation), Kyiv, 2015, 46 p. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Human Studies: Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series of “Pedagogy”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial policy and ethics of the scholarly journal Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy is grounded on the recommendations of Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE), best practice of Ukrainian and international academic societies, institutions and editorial boards of scientific periodicals, and also on the Ethic Standards of Ukrainian Scientists. Scientists should be confident of reliability and soundness of their own researches and their colleagues’, as well. Unfortunately, this situation has not been flawless recently, as now and then one can face the ethics violations, which in an undermining factor for people’ trust to science and those of the academic world. To prevent such a situation in Ukraine, every researcher should be wholly concern to follow the ethic requirements and be fully aware of the public opinion forming he is responsible for.
Ethical Obligations of Authors
- An author presents a concise and accurate report of the research and an objective discussion of its significance. A primary research report should contain sufficient and clear detail and its findings should be amenable to verification by peers with no data distortion or manipulation.
- An author bears responsibility for the scientific content as well as the fact of publication.
- An author should cite those publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work and that will guide the reader quickly to the earlier work that is essential for understanding the present investigation. It is necessary that the fundamental sources used in this research, if not obtained by an author, should be properly cited.
- It is not acceptable to represent plagiarism as original work for publication or previously published articles. An Author should bear responsibility, should this be disclosed.
- Those who have contributed significantly to the research and share the responsibility for obtained results should be listed as co-authors. On submission of the manuscript, the corresponding author attests to the fact that those named as co-authors have agreed to its submission for publication and accepts the responsibility for having properly included all (and only) co-authors.
- An author should reveal to the editor any potential conflict of interest that might be affected by publication of the results contained in a manuscript.
- An author should identify the source of all information quoted or offered, all references to the sources used in the research should be provided in accordance with APA.
- The editorial board reserves the right to reject the manuscript that does not meet the set standards.
Publication Agreement and Copyright License
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written or contribution to the manuscript currently entitled ________________________________________________________________
The parties to this Agreement are: _____________________________________ (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”)
and Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, publisher and copyright owner of the Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy in the person of Rector Mrs. Skotna N.V. (“Publisher”).
1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, and use the Work in any form and in any media, in whole or in part, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Work in an issue of the Publication, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Work, authorize reproduction of the entire Work in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Work or an abstract thereof by the means of computerizes retrieval system. The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Work (or portion of the written by the Author), and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense, or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
c) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the World authorizes by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Work under the terms of paragraphs 1a and 1b of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
2. EDITING OF THE WORK
The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Work as suitable for inclusion in the Publication. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author. The Publisher agrees to publish the Work subject to the understanding that the Work will not be published in the Publication unless, in its final form, the Work is acceptable to both the Author and the Publisher.
3. WARRANTIES
a)The Author represents and warrants that, to the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c)The Author represents and warrants that the Work furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall remain in effect for as long as copyright protection subsists in the Work as defined by the copyright laws of each country in the World.
5.PAYMENT
The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Work or the licenses granted in this Agreement, unless separately negotiated in writing. The Publisher will publish the Work and will provide the Author with print copy of the bound Publication in which the Work appears as per its normal policy. The Author will have the opportunity to order additional reprints at the Author’s expense before the Publication containing the Work goes to press.
6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Work, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party expect those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
Author(s):___________ Publisher: Skotna N.V.,
Signed:_____________ Drohobych Ivan Franko
Date:_______________ State Pedagogical University
Signed:_____________________
Date:_______________________