METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO STUDYING EDUCATIONAL WORK WITH CHILDREN

Authors

  • Nadiya Ashytok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119508

Keywords:

child, education, upbringing, anthropological, axiological and culturological approaches, humanistic paradigm

Abstract

ASHYTOK Nadiya – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of General Pedagogy and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko str., 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine (ashytni@ukr.net)

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7447-5840

ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/D-6076-2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119508

To cite this article: Ashytok, N. (2018). Methodological approaches to studying educational work with children. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 6/38, 15–25. doi: 10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119508 [in English].

Article history

Received: 21 September 2017

Received in revised form: 23 October 2017

Accepted: 15 February 2018

Available online: 5 April 2018

 

Abstract. The choice of concept (approach, paradigm) is an important factor in education. This choice is associated with a review of the goals and principles of the development of children in the modern world. A successful selection of approaches facilitates the search for effective innovative technologies for the upbringing and education of children. The author believes that such approaches include anthropological, culturological and axiological approaches.

The article is devoted to review of these approaches in the modern scientific literature. It indicates a close link between the anthropological, axiological and culturological approaches. The article analyzes the ways of improving the educational process in the implementation of various forms of teaching on the methodological basis of anthropological, axiological and culturological approaches.

The author pays special attention to the study of the problem of the formation of moral values and moral ideals of children. The moral education of children is analyzed on the basis of the mentioned methodological approaches.

The author considers the peculiarities of the work of teachers working with children with special educational needs. The article analyzes important modern problems necessary for educating people with special educational needs in Ukraineon the basis of anthropological, culturological and axiological approaches. It is noted that these tasks are solved in the context of the search for ways of developing a national education system that should be formed in accordance with modern processes of integration and globalization with a view to transforming the country into a post-industrial civilization, which will ensure the stable movement and development of Ukraine in the 21st century as well as the integration of the national education system into the European and the world of learning space.

 

 

Acknowledgments. Sincere thanks to pedagogical staff at Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, in particular to Maryana Kekosh, for her linguistic assistance.

Funding. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding from the Department of Education of Executive Bodies of Drohobych City Council permitted this research completion.

Author Biography

Nadiya Ashytok

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of General Pedagogy and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko str. 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine (ashytni@ukr.net)

References

Avdiiants, H., & Nalyvaiko, V. (2010). Vykhovannia humanistychnykh tsinnostei v uchniv pochatkovykh klasiv: suchasnyi stan problemy [The upbringing of humanistic values in elementary school students: the current state of the problem]. Humanizatsiia navchalno-vykhovnoho protsesuHumanization of the educational process, LII (1), 208–217 [in Ukrainian].

Bim-Bad, B.M. (2015). Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya? Eto prosto! [Pedagogical anthropology? Itʼs simple!]. Retrieved from http://www.bim-bad.ru/biblioteka/article_full.php?aid=567 [in Russian].

Vygotskiy, L.S. (2014). K psikhologii i pedagogike detskoy defektivnosti [Towards the psychology and pedagogy of child defectiveness]. Khrestomatiya po vozrastnoy i pedagogicheskoy psikhologiiReading books by age and pedagogical psychologists. Retrieved from www.detskiysad.ru/ped/hrestomatia06.html [in Russian].

Gessen, S.I. (1995). Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu filosofiyu [Fundamentals of pedagogy. Introduction to Applied Philosophy]. Moscow: Shkola-Press [in Russian].

Dashutin, H.P., & Mykhalchenko, M.I. (2001). Ukrainskyi eksperyment na terezakh humanizmu [Ukrainian experiment on the scales of humanism]. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd. [in Ukrainian].

Disterveg, A. (1998). O prirodosoobraznosti i kulturosoobraznosti v obuchenii [On the appropriateness and culturality of learning]. Retrieved from http://jorigami.ru/PP_corner/Classics/Diesterweg/Diesterweg_Adolf_Nature_and_Culture.htm [in Russian].

Ilenkov, E.V. (2013). Chto zhe takoe lichnost? [What is personality?]. Retrieved from http://philosophy.pp.net.ua/publ/ehv_ilenkov_chto_zhe_takoe_lichnost [in Russian].

Kant, I. (1996). Antropologiya s pragmaticheskoy tochki zreniya [Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view]. Kant i sobranie sochineniyaKant and Collected works, 6, 349–587. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Kobrii, O. (2014). Tendentsii udoskonalennia zmistu vyshchoi pedahohichnoi osvity Ukrainy [Trends in improving the content of higher pedagogical education in Ukraine]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 29 (2), 112–121 [in Ukrainian].

Maksakova, V.I. (2001). Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya [Pedagogical antropology]. Moscow: Akademiya [in Russian].

Natsionalna doktryna rozvytku osvity Ukrainy u ХХІ stolitti [The National Doctrine of the Development of Ukrainian Education in the 21st Century]. (2002). Retrieved from file:///C:/Documents%Downloads/natsionalna%20doktryna.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Nevmerzhytska, O. (2015). Vykhovnyi ideal: evoliutsiia ta suchasne traktuvannia [Educational ideal: evolution and modern interpretation]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Pedahohika – Human Studies. Pedagogy, 1/31, 219–230 [in Ukrainian].

Pro osvitu – Osvita. UA [About education – Education. UA]. (2017). Retrieved from http://ru.osvita.ua/legislation/law/2231 [in Ukrainian].

Ushinskiy, K.D. (2004). Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya [Man as an object of education]. Retrieved from http://studentdream.narod.ru/ushi1.htm [in Russian].

Chepil, M. (2008). Teoretychni zasady pidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia do vykhovnoi roboty z uchniamy [Theoretical principles of training future teacher for educational work with students]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 17, 4–14 [in Ukrainian].

Parsons, S., & Platt, L. (2017). The early academic progress of children with special educational needs. British Educational Research Journal, 43, 466–485. doi: 10.1002/berj.3276 [in English].

Siddiqua, A., & Janus, M. (2017). Experiences of parents of children with special needs at school entry: a mixed method approach. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43, 566–576. doi: 10.1111/cch.12443 [in English].

Shaw, A. (2017). Inclusion: the role of special and mainstream schools. British Journal of Special Education, 44, 292–312. doi: 10.1111/1467-8578.12181 [in English].

Törmänen, M., & Roebers, C. (2017). Developmental outcomes of children in classes for special educational needs: results from a longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12395 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2018-02-17

Issue

Section

Статті