SPECIFIC CHARACTER OF INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERACTION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PERSONALITY’S AGENCY AS A PEDAGOGICAL REALITY

Authors

  • Olena Halian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119516

Keywords:

agency of the personality, interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary interaction, poly-scientific approach, integrity of scientific knowledge, systemic approach, pedagogical reality

Abstract

HALIAN OlenaPhD of Psychological Sciences, associate professor of General Pedagogy and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko str., 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine (halyane@ukr.net)

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6070-9669

ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/E-9369-2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119516

To cite this article: Halian, O. (2018). Spetsyfika interdystsyplinarnoi spivdii v interpretatsii subiektnosti osobystosti yak pedahohichnoi realnosti [Specific character of interdisciplinary interaction in the interpretation of the personality’s agency as a pedagogical reality]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 6/38, 105–115. doi: 10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119516 [in Ukrainian].

Article history

Received: 12 September 2017

Received in revised form: 20 November 2017

Accepted: 15 February 2015

Available online: 5 April 2018

 

Abstract. The study justifies the importance of interaction between different branches of knowledge in explaining the phenomena that need to be rethought at the postclassical stage. It is established that the interdisciplinary approach in the plane of the scientific analysis of pedagogical reality expands the boundaries of perception of the essence of the studentʼs agency, assimilating new discourses. It emphasizes the multiplicity of interpretations of the agencyʼs manifestations, which makes it possible to understand it in inter-, inter- and interdisciplinary approaches.

The studentʼs agency is emphasized as a pedagogical reality requiring disclosure of its essence, taking into account a new level of understanding of the personality and its role in different spheres of life, in particular, reorientation of scientific research in the direction of studying opportunities for pupils to realize their authorship of their own lives. With this in mind, we analyzed the contribution of historians, culturologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists to the agent of the personality essence. A comprehensive understanding of the agency in this context is provided by an interdisciplinary approach in which pedagogical science finds its scientific field, solving its urgent tasks.

It is established that the anthropological aspect of the civilization of the 21st century posed the question of the content of education and upbringing, as well as those forms of work that provide the pupils’ conscious personal attitude to everything that accompanies their ascent to the feeling and the formation of an adequate vital position. It is pointed out that the phenomenon of the agency, as an empirical pedagogical reality, characterizes an important ability of the student to be an active participant in pedagogical cooperation, revealing his own initiative and creative character on the basis of autonomous conscious activity.

 

 

Acknowledgments. Sincere thanks to librarian staff at Lviv National Vasyl Stefanyk Scientific Library of Ukraine, in particular Olha Valukha.

Funding. The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Biography

Olena Halian

PhD of Psychological Sciences, associate professor of General Pedagogy and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko str., 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine (halyane@ukr.net)

References

Arshinov, V.I., & Lepskiy, V.E. (2010). Subyektnost v kontekste etapov razvitiya nauki (ot klassicheskoy k postneklassicheskoy nauke) [Agency in the context of the stages of the development of science (from classical to post-non-classical science]. Problema sborki subyektov v postneklassicheskoy nauke – The problem of assembling subjects in post-nonclassical science (pp. 52–58) [in Russian].

Dichek, N.P. (2014). Metodolohichni aspekty modernizatsii vitchyznianykh istoryko-pedahohichnykh doslidzhen [Methodological aspects of modernization of national historical and pedagogical researches]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia – Pedagogy and psychology, 2, 67–75 [in Ukrainian].

Karpenko, Z.S. (2006). Kartohrafiia intehralnoi subiektnosti: post-postmodernistskyi proekt [Cartography of integral agency: post-postmodern project], Liudyna. Subiekt. Vchynok: filosofsko-psykholohichni studii – Human. Subject. Action: philosophical and psychological studies (pp. 157–177) [in Ukrainian].

Kvas, O. (2016). Problema formuvannia obrazu dytynstva v sotsialno-humanitarnykh doslidzhenniakh [Problem of childhood image formation in social-humanitarian researches]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 2/34, 91–100 [in Ukrainian].

Kodzhaspirova, G.M., & Kodzhaspirov, A.Yu. (2005). Slovar po pedagogike [Dictionary of Pedagogy]. Moskva: IKTs «MarT» [in Russian].

Kopnin, P.V. (1968). Logicheskie osnovy nauki [The logical foundations of science]. Kiev: Naukova dumka [in Russian].

Nahorna, L.P. (2014). Istorychna kultura: kontsept, informatsiinyi resurs, refleksyvnyi potentsial [Historical culture: concept, information resource, reflexive potential]. Kyiv: IPiNND [in Ukrainian].

Onyshchenko, V.D. (2014). Fundamentalni pedahohichni teorii [Fundamental pedagogical theories]. Lviv: Norma [in Ukrainian].

Pelipenko, A.A. (2013). Dvoynaya subyektnost istorii [Double agency of history]. Retrieved from http://apelipenko.ru [in Russian].

Skotna, N.V. (2005). Osoba v rozkolotii tsyvilizatsii: osvita, svitohliad, dii [A person in a split civilization: education, world outlook, actions]. Lviv: Ukrainski tekhnolohii [in Ukrainian].

Snopkova, E.I. (2015). Aktualnost mezhdistsiplinarnogo podkhoda v pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh: nauchnoe obosnovanie [The relevance of the interdisciplinary approach in pedagogical research: the scientific justification]. Integraciya obrazovaniya – Integration of education, 19 (1), 111–117 [in Russian].

Fedorova, O.V. (2014). A i B sideli na trube, ili mezhdistsiplinarnost kognitivnykh issledovaniy [A and B were sitting on a pipe, or the interdisciplinarity of cognitive studies]. Logos – Logos, 1, 19–34 [in Russian].

Frodeman, R., Klein, T.J., & Mitcham, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press [in English].

Gurycka, A. (Ed.). (1989). Podmiotowość w doświadczeniach wychowawczych dzieci i młodzieży [Agency in educational experiences of children and adolescents]. Warszawa: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego [in Polish].

Könings, K., Bovill, C., & Woolner, P. (2017). Towards an interdisciplinary model of practice for participatory building design in education. European Journal of Education, 52, 306–317. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12230 [in English].

Published

2018-02-17

Issue

Section

Статті