APPLICATION OF FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE FOR MULTI-CRETIRIAL ASSESSMENT OF LABOR SAFETY AS AN OBJECT OF QUALIMETRY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2022.19.076Keywords:
functional dependence;, assessment methodology;, multi-criteria assessment;, qualimetry object;, generalized indicator;, labor safetyAbstract
The subject matter of the article is the method of multi-criteria assessment of the indicator of labor safety in production. The goal of the work is to develop a methodology for applying functional dependence for multi-criteria assessment of labor safety in production, taking into account the characteristics of the system of harmful and dangerous production factors. The following task is solved in the article: to explore the possibility of using a functional dependence to obtain estimates of different-dimensional labor safety indicators on a dimensionless scale, while taking into account its unevenness and coordinating it with the characteristics of hazardous factors in production. Methods are used: qualimetry and mathematical statistics; expert. The following results were obtained: the existing functional dependencies between the measured values of quality indicators and their assessment on a dimensionless scale, which were used to evaluate qualimetry objects of various natures, were analyzed. It is shown that for an objective assessment of qualimetry objects, as a rule, nonlinear dependencies should be used. The main task of the researcher is to choose the type of nonlinear dependence; this requires additional scientific research. The tool for choosing one or another non-linear relationship is the understanding of the physical essence of the qualimetry object, that is, the understanding of the patterns of the relationship between the measured value of the qualimetry indicators and their assessment. For this, it is important to use the methods of expert assessments, because usually such patterns are unknown. The functional dependence used to obtain estimates of labor safety indicators in production is stepwise and includes a form parameter. By changing the shape parameter, the curvature of the dependence changes, thereby changing the estimate on the dimensionless scale. This feature of the applied dependence allows us to develop a universal methodology, that is, by changing the shape parameter, this dependence can be applied to various indicators of labor safety in any production. As an example, the article considers metallurgical production, while assessing the most dangerous factors. A step-by-step methodology for determining a generalized indicator of labor safety in production and an example of measured numerical values of hazardous factors has been developed, its effectiveness and versatility have been shown. Conclusions: to determine the generalized indicator of occupational safety at work, it is proposed to use the functional relationship between individual indicators of harmful production factors and their values on a dimensionless scale, which gives a quantitative assessment of occupational safety at work. With the help of the proposed method, you can make management decisions, which minimizes the deviation of the actual values of harmful factors from the optimal ones.
References
Тріщ Г. М. Розробка методології оцінювання процесів систем управління якістю підприємств з урахуванням вимог міжнародних стандарті: дис. канд. техн. наук : 05.01.02 ''Стандартизація, сертифікація та метрологічне забезпечення''. 2014. Харків, 162 с.
Ginevicius R., Trishch H., Petraskevicius V. Quantitative assessment of quality management systems’processes. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2015. Vol. 1. №. 28. P. 1096–1110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1087676.
Тріщ Г. М., Денисенко М. В. Аналіз стану системи управління якістю в динаміці. Технологический аудит и резервы производства. 2014. №1/5 (15). С. 14–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2014.21717.
Trishch R., Cherniak O., Kupriyanov O., Luniachek V., Tsykhanovska I. Methodology for multi-criteria assess-ment of working conditions as an object of qualimetry. Engineering Management in Production and Services. 2021. №13 (2). Р. 107–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0016.
Trishch R., Nechuiviter O., Dyadyura K., Vasilevskyi O., Tsykhanovska I., Yakovlev M. Qualimetric method of assessing risks of low quality products. MM Science Journal. 2021. №4. P.4769–4774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_10_2021030.
Argotti Y., Baron C., Esteban P. Quality quantification in Systems Engineering from the Qualimetry Eye. 2019 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon). 2019. P. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2019.8836756.
Горбенко Н. А., Катрич О. А. Оценивание процессов системы менеджмента качества предприятий на соответствие требований международных стандартов серии ISO 9000. Вісник Національного технічного університету „ХПІ”: Збірник наукових праць. Серія: Механіко-технологічні системи та комплекси. 2014. № 40 (1083). С. 20–25.
Черкашина О. С. Керування якістю технологічних процесів в машинобудуванні з застосуванням трипараметричного моделювання. Машинобудування. 2019. №23. С. 159–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32820/2079-1747-2019-23-159-165.
Ким Н. И., Трищ Р. М. Закономерности рассеивания безразмерных показателей качества объектов различной природы. Системи управління, навігації та зв'язку. Серія: Метрологія та вимірювальна техніка. 2016. № 4 (40). С. 143–145.
Zhang C., Chen C., Streimikiene D., Balezentis T. Intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA approach for multi-criteria assessment of the energy storage technologies. Applied Soft Computing. 2019. №79. P. 410–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.04.008.
Alamerew Y.A., Kambanou M. L, Sakao T, Brissaud D. A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method of Product-Level Circularity Strategies. Sustainability. 2020. 12 (12): 5129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125129.
Zolfani S., Maknoon R., Zavadskas E. Multiple Nash Equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2015. № 16. P. 290–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2014.967715.
Черняк О. М., Сороколат Н. А., Каницька І. В. Застосування методу інтегрування для оцінювання якості об’єктів кваліметрії. Вісник Національного технічного університету «ХПІ». Серія: Нові рішення в сучасних технологіях. Харків: НТУ «ХПІ». 2020. № 4 (6). С. 93–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2020.14.169.
Черняк О. М., Сороколат Н. А., Каницька І. В. Графоаналітичний метод визначення комплексного показника якості об’єктів кваліметрії. Сучасний стан наукових досліджень та технологій в промисловості. 2020. № 4 (14). С. 169–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2020.14.169.
Кім Н. І. Узагальнений показник якості об’єктів кваліметрії різної природи. Вісник аграрної науки Причорномор’я. 2021. Вип. 1. С. 94–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31521/2313-092X/2021-1(109)-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold the copyright without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-commercial and non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.