THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR IRRATIONAL COMPONENT OF UKRAINIAN SOCIETY IN SPECIFIC MARKETS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30837/ITSSI.2023.24.221Keywords:
behaviour; irrationality; Ukrainian society; decision-making processAbstract
The subject matter of the article is the theoretical-methodical and applied principles of behavioural economics and their implementation in Ukrainian society. The goal of the work is to analyse the theory of irrationality in the economic context to find out what its character is in modern Ukrainian conditions, as well as to confirm the main paradoxes inherent in the individual’s decision-making behaviour. The following tasks were solved in the article: highlighting important aspects of the theory of irrationality for experimental analysis; determination of the methodology of experiments based on internationally recognized works; proposing a hypothesis regarding Ukrainian realities; conducting experiments according to the proposed methodology to test the proposed hypotheses and systematize the obtained results. The following methods are used: analytical and inductive methods for determining the set of behavioural experiments and building hypotheses regarding their results; experimental method and method of mathematical processing to check the presence of selected behavioural deviations in Ukraine. The following results were obtained: it was determined that in Ukrainian society there is a difference between the degree of individualistic attitudes in different age groups; determined change in the perception of information of different generations as a result of more significant digitization of the young population; a higher tendency of children to risk for certain conditions is determined; the similarity of the obtained results of the experiments with the global ones are established and the impact of technologies on the economic behaviour of individuals and the peculiarities caused by the historical context and expanded access to information, in general, are determined. Conclusions: the use of analytical and inductive methods in combination with an experimental approach confirmed the existence of some of the classic behavioural patterns for modern Ukrainian society, in particular: the Allais paradox, the effect of bounded rationality, the effect of joining the majority, the effect of ownership and asymmetric dominance. In addition, based on the obtained results, it was determined that for Ukraine there is a significant difference between the nature of irrationality in different age groups, however, the postulation of this statement beyond the selected target groups requires additional research, as well as consideration of the context of other market entities.
References
References
Cartwright, E. (2018), Behavioral Economics, Routledge, London, 586 p.
Ariely, D., Garcia-Rada, X., Gödker, K., Hornuf, L. and Mann, H. (2019), "The impact of two different economic systems on dishonesty", European Journal of Political Economy, No. 59, Р. 179–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.02.010
Simon, H. A. and Laird, J. E. (2019), Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 256 p.
Sakai, Y. (2018), "Daniel Ellsberg on J.M. Keynes and F.H. Knight: risk ambiguity and uncertainty", Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, No 16 (1), P. 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s40844-018-0114-9
Meramveliotakis, G. and Manioudis, M. (2021), "History, Knowledge, and Sustainable Economic Development: The Contribution of John Stuart Mill’s Grand Stage Theory", Sustainability, No. 13 (3), P. 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/su13031468
Arnott, D. and Gao, S. (2019), "Behavioral economics for decision support systems researchers", Decision Support Systems, No. 122 (12), P. 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.05.003
Thaler, R. (2020), "What’s next for nudging and choice architecture?", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, No. 163, P. 4–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.04.003
Romani, R. (2021), "Narrative economics: how stories go viral and drive major economic events", The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, No. 28 (3), Р. 496–497. DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2021.1928927
Basu, S. and Sen, S. (2023), "COVID 19 Pandemic, Socio-Economic Behaviour and Infection Characteristics: An Inter-Country Predictive Study Using Deep Learning", Computational Economics, No. 61, Р. 645–676. DOI: 10.1007/s10614-021-10223-5
Sandmo, A. (2023), "The Market in Economics: Behavioural Assumptions and Value Judgments", In: Market, Ethics and Religion, Springer, Cham, Р. 19–39. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08462-1
Pylypenko, N. and Bieliaieva, V. (2019), "The Possibility of Applying the Tools of Behavioral Economics for Economic Policy in Ukraine", Ekonomika ta derzhava, No. 95 (5), Р. 95–100. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2019.5.95
Tsyganova, N. (2019), "Interaction of Financial Market Subjects in the Condition of the Behavior Economy", Scientific opinion: Economics and Management, No 64 (2), Р. 174–184. DOI: 10.32836/2521-666x/2019-2-64-21
Blasheck, T. L. and Jawwad, N. (2020), "The Dark Side of Variety: An Economic Model of Choice Overload". The Yale Undergraduate Research Journal, No. 1 (1), Р. 1–19, available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/yurj/vol1/iss1/38 (last accessed 28.06.2023).
Martina, R. A. (2019), "Toward a theory of affordable loss", Small Business Economics, No. 54 (3), Р. 751–774. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00151-y
Rossiter, J. R., (2019), "A critique of prospect theory and framing with particular reference to consumer decisions", Journal of Consumer Behaviour, No. 18 (5), Р. 399–405. DOI: 10.1002/cb.1779
List, J. A. (2021), "Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem", In: The Art of Experimental Economics, Routledge, London, Р. 85–102. DOI: 10.4324/9781003019121
Catapano, R., Shennib, F. and Levav, J. (2022), "Preference Reversals Between Digital and Physical Goods", Journal of Marketing Research, No. 59 (2), Р. 353–373. DOI: 10.1177/00222437211065020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Артем Ховрат, Денис Тесленко, Нурал Гулієв, Валентина Кирій
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors hold the copyright without restrictions and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-commercial and non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.