The issues of absenteeism and presenteeism in terms of the right to decent and safe conditions of labor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.4.5

Keywords:

absenteeism, presenteeism, occupational safety, mental health, labor

Abstract

The right to work is a fundamental human right, whereas decent, safe and favorable conditions of labor are essential to its implementation. Today, decent labor implies efficient employment that provides a fair income, job security, and social protection. Approval of the concept of decent labor and its implementation in practice also means approval of the concept of respect for employees’ rights and taking measures to improve conditions of labor.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the issues of absenteeism and presenteeism in terms of the right to decent and safe conditions of labor; to determine the interconnection between the improper fulfillment of the employer’s obligations to create a safe labor environment on the one hand, and absenteeism and presenteeism in the workplace on the other.

The methodological basis of the research is the results of previously conducted foreign studies, scientific conclusions, and views on the concept, causes, consequences of absenteeism and presenteeism; legal acts and provisions of the International Labor Organization.

The authors of the article emphasize that today’s labor activity carries more and more risks associated not only with the physical but also with the mental health of an employee. Therefore, modern safety and health management systems at enterprises, as well as legal norms, require constant transformation in the direction of the development of society, social values and employees’ needs. The article identifies the main causes of absenteeism, presenteeism and their consequences, as well as concludes that an unsafe labor environment is one of the main factors resulting in presenteeism and absenteeism.

The article also points out that the implementation of certain programs (which aim at improving the balance between stress factors at work and work resources; supporting employees, taking care of their physical, mental, financial and social well-being; the formation of a safe, healthy, inclusive labor culture that increases productivity and work efficiency; the regulatory expansion of the content of the right to safe conditions of labor; the creation of additional guarantees for the employee in the field of occupational safety, in particular the safety of mental health and their consolidation at the local or legislative level) is now a necessity, a demand of society and a guarantee of the productive activity of enterprises and the growth of the economy as a whole.

References

A safe and healthy working environment is a fundamental principle and right at work. International Labour Organization. Official website. URL: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/areasofwork/fundamental-principle/lang--en/index.htm (date of access: 21.09.2023) [In English].

Johnston DA, Harvey SB, Glozier N, Calvo RA, Christensen H, Deady M. The relationship between depression symptoms, absenteeism and presenteeism. J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:536-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.041. Epub 2019 Jun 30. PMID: 31280078 [In English].

Evans-Lacko, S., Knapp, M. Global patterns of workplace productivity for people with depression: absenteeism and presenteeism costs across eight diverse countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 51, 1525–1537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1278-4 [In English].

Paul Langley, Gerhard Müller-Schwefe, Andrew Nicolaou, Hiltrud Liedgens, Joseph Pergolizzi & Giustino Varrassi (2010) The impact of pain on labor force participation, absenteeism and presenteeism in the European Union, Journal of Medical Economics, 13:4, 662-672, DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2010.529379 [In English].

The Right to a Safe and Healthy Work Environment Becomes an ILO Fundamental Principle. ComplianceQuest. Official website. URL: https://www.compliancequest.com/blog/safe-healthy-working-environment-now-fundamental-right/ (date of access: 21.09.2023) [In English].

Brunner, B., Igic, I., Keller, A.C. et al. Who gains the most from improving working conditions? Health-related absenteeism and presenteeism due to stress at work. Eur J Health Econ 20, 1165– 1180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01084- [In English].

Parent-Thirion A, et al. Eurofound, Sixth European Working Conditions Survey—Overview Report (2017 update) Luxembourg: J Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. [In English].

Nikunlaakso, R., Reuna, K., Oksanen, T. et al. Associations between accumulating job stressors, workplace social capital, and psychological distress on work-unit level: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 23, 1559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16506-w [In English].

Nowak, J., Emmermacher, A., Wendsche, J. et al. Presenteeism and absenteeism in the manufacturing sector: A multilevel approach identifying underlying factors and relations to health. Curr Psychol 42, 18641–18659 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03013-1 [In English].

Pärli, Kurt. (2018). Presenteeism, Its Effects and Costs: A Discussion in a Labour Law Perspective. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations. 34. 53–75. 10.54648/ IJCL2018003 [In English].

Patel, C., Biron, M., Cooper, S. C., & Budhwar, P. S. (2023). Sick and working: Current challenges and emerging directions for future presenteeism research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(6), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2727 [In English].

Maestas, N.A., Mullen, K.J., & Rennane, S. (2021). Absenteeism and Presenteeism Among American Workers.JournalofDisabilityPolicyStudies,32(1),13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207320933211 [In English].

Schnabel, C. Presenteeism at the workplace. IZA World of Labor 2022: 495 doi: 10.15185/izawol.495 [In English].

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26