On the issue of procedural legal advocation of a civil plaintiff in criminal proceedings: doctrine and practical problems, ways to overcome them

Authors

  • Ksenia Taranets Postgraduate student of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Law Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Department of Criminal Procedure and Forensics, lawyer, senior partner of JSC “Trust and Legal”, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.4.13

Keywords:

civil plaintiff in criminal proceedings, civil claim in criminal proceedings

Abstract

The issue of the procedural status of a civil plaintiff in criminal proceedings and the issue of a person’s right to compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense has always been in the center of attention of lawyers - academics and practicing practitioners. The relevance of the chosen topic and the purpose of the research is due to certain doctrinal and practical gaps in the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, as well as contradictions between the norms of criminal procedural law, civil procedural law, and the provisions of inheritance law, which arise in the conditions of criminal proceedings, and are caused by death (or the condition, which makes it impossible to participate) of the injured person, who is a civil plaintiff in a civil claim for damages, at the stage of pre-trial and judicial criminal proceedings. Taking into account the set goal of criminal proceedings, which consists, among other things, in compensating the injured person for the moral and (or) property damage caused to him by a criminal offense, in this article the author not only analyzes individual scientific views and examines the relevant legal norms regulating procedural procedure of criminal legal succession, however, attention is emphasized and own proposals are made to improve the legal mechanism of legal succession of a participant in criminal proceedings, such as a civil plaintiff in a civil claim for damages presented in criminal proceedings. In conducting scientific research, the author used the formal-logical (dogmatic) method in interpreting the normative content of laws and formulating the definitions of individual legal concepts of the research issues, as well as the method of systemic-structural analysis, which contributed to the study of types of legal conflicts and gaps. Based on the results of the scientific research, the author outlined separate doctrinal and practical problems of the studied issue, and outlined the conclusions regarding the need to improve the current version of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and clarify the procedural rights of the civil plaintiff during procedural succession in criminal proceedings, by adding a new article to the Criminal Procedure Law, and made suggestions to the specified edition.

References

Kryminalnyi protsesualnyui kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Urkaine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text> data zvernennia 25.09.2023 [in Ukrainian].

Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy : [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]: v 11 tomakh. 1976. Tom 7, 1976. P. 508. < http://sum.in.ua/s/pravonastupnyk > data zvernennia 25.09.2023 [in Ukrainian].

Hoshovskyi M., Kuchynska O., (1998) Poterpilyi u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy [Victim in criminal procedure of Ukraine]. Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter 1998. 55. [in Ukrainian].

Herasymchuk O., (2007) Pravonastupnytstvo u kryminalnomu protsesi u vypadku smerti poterpiloho [Criminal proceedings succession in case of victim’s death]. Advokat. 12 [in Ukrainian].

Kuchynska O., Shchyhol O. (2019) Okremi problemy protsesualnoho statusu poterpiloho v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Selected issues of procedural status of victim in criminal proceedings]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 1/2019, 18-25 [in Ukrainian].

Nestor N.V. (2022) Zabezpechennia prav i zakonnykh interesiv poterpiloho v kryminalnomu provadzhenni Urkainy [Ensuring the rights and legal interests of the victim in criminal proceedings in Ukraine]. Mizhvidomchyi Naukovo-metodychnyi zbirnyk Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vypusk 67. 2022. 124–136. [in Ukrainian].

Mudrak I.V. (2020) Shchodo uchasti u kryminalnomy provadzhenni pravonastypnuka poterpiloho [Regarding to participation in criminal procedings of the successor of the victim]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho, Seriia: yurydychni nauky. Tom 31 (70) № 4, 2020, 244-245 [in Ukrainian].

Navrotska V.V. (2010) Protsesualne pravonastypnutstvo pry rozghliadi tsyvilnoho pozovy u kryminalnii spravi [Procedural succession during consideration of a civil claim in the criminal case]. Naykovui visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. № 1. 2010. 408 [in Ukrainian].

Civilnuy kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.01.2003. № 435-IV https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text> data zvernennia vid 25.09.2023 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2023-12-26