Law-making activity in modern conditions: essential dimensions and functional orientation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.1.19Keywords:
law-making, law-making process, legal regulation, law-making policy, factors influencing law-making, directions of law-making activity, functions of law-makingAbstract
The article emphasizes that the effectiveness of state-making processes in any democratic state is determined by a number of factors, among which law-making occupies an important place as one of the main directions of state activity. Law-making is the result of the objective development of social relations, directly aimed at their regulation. The purpose, content and results of law-making activities are determined by various factors. Among them, the following ones are traditionally distinguished: professionalism of law-making subjects and their objectivity; the degree of influence and nature of the interests of individual social groups (the so-called lobbying); level of development of state legal institutions; legal culture of the population; form of government, government and regime; the nature of society’s mentality, etc.
It is substantiated that law-making is based on law-making policy. The task of law-making policy is to ensure the system, integrity and consistency of legislation, to eliminate gaps in the latter. Attention is drawn to the fact that law-making characterizes the development of law and is a legal form of activity of the state and authorized subjects in the development, adoption, change, suspension and cancellation of legal standards.
On the basis of clarifying the essential and meaningful features of law-making functions, their concept was formulated. It is emphasized that the functions of law-making should be understood as the directions of its influence on the development of social relations, which reveal its essence, nature and purpose in society and the state and are aimed at fulfilling certain of its tasks. Particular attention is paid to the types of law-making functions and their features are characterized.
References
Pravotvorennia i pravotvorchist v umovakh voiennoho stanu ta myrobudivnytstva / za zah. red. N.M. Parkhomenko. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd-vo. 2023. 230 s.
Osnovy derzhavy i prava : navchalnyi posibnyk / za red. A.M. Kolodii, A.Iu. Oliinyk. Kyiv: Lybid, 1997. 208 s.
Rudnieva O.M., Yarmysh O.N. Pravova polityka Ukrainy: stan, problemy, kontseptualizatsii ta pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti (analitychna dopovid). Pravova polityka Ukrainy: kontseptualni zasady ta mekhanizmy formuvannia: zb. aterialiv nauk. prakt. konf. (K., 5 hrud. 2012 r.)/za red O.M. Rudnievoi, d.iu.n, prof. K: NIDS, 2–13. S. 17-18.
Slinko S.S. Pravotvorcha polityka derzhavy v suchasnykh umovakh aktyvizatsii pravotvorchoi diialnosti. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. 2012. № 4. S. 81-82.
Slinko S.S. Pravotvorcha polityka derzhavy v suchasnykh umovakh aktyvizatsii pravotvorchoi diialnosti. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. 2012. № 4. S. 81-82.
Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia: u 20 t. T. 3: Zahalna teoriia prava / redkol.: O.V. Petryshyn (holova) ta in.; Nats. akad. prav. Nauk Ukrainy; I-t derzhavy i prava imeni V.M. Koretskoho; Nats. yuryd universytet imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. 2017. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2016. S. 825. (952 s.: il.)
Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyi kurs : Pidruchnyk / Za red. O.V. Zaichuka, N.M. Onishchenko. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 2006. S. 316. (688s.).
Zakonotvorcha diialnist: Slovnyk terminiv i poniat / Za zah. red. akad. NAN Ukrainy V.M. Lytvyna. Kyiv: Parlamentske vyd-vo, 2004. S. 331. 344 s.
Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava: Pidruchnyk dlia studentiv yurydychnykh vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv / M.V. Tsvik, O.V. Petryshyn, L.V. Avramenko ta in., Za red., d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad., APrN Ukrainy M.V. Tsvika, d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof., akad. APrN Ukrainy O.V. Petryshyna. Kharkiv : Pravo, 2009. S. 273-274. (584 s.)
Pravotvorchist v Ukraini: perspektyvy zakonodavchoho rehuliuvannia : zbirnyk naukovykh prats / za zah. red. O.O. Kota, A.B. Hryniaka, N.V. Milovskoi. Odesa: Vydavnychyi dim «Helvetyka», 2022. S. 9. (226 s.); Kuznietsova N.S. Zabezpechennia yakisnoi systematyzatsii yak vazhlyva skladova pravotvorchoi diialnosti. Pravo Ukrainy. 2021. № 12.
Zahalna teoriia prava / Za zah. red. M.I. Koziubry, Kyiv: Vaite, 2015. S. 193. (392 s.)
Parkhomenko N.M. Paradyhma pravovoho rehuliuvannia v Ukraini: zmistovno-instrumentalni vymiry: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Parlamentske vydavnytstvo, 2023. S. 43. 320 s.
Parkhomenko N.M. Osoblyvosti pravotvorchoi diialnosti za umovy voiennoho stanu. Almanakh prava. Aktualni problemy pravovoho rozvytku v umovakh viiny ta pisliavoiennoi vidbudovy derzhavy. 2022. Vyp. 13. S. 29. (S. 28–33).
Lvova O.L. Obmezhennia prav liudyny: poniattia, zmist. Pravova derzhava. Vyp. 32. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 2021. S. 83. S. 81–89.
Bobrovnyk S.V. Pravovyi kompromis v aspekti protsesiv sotsializatsii. Pravova derzhava. Vyp. 32. Kyiv: Instytut derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, 2021. S. 60-61. S. 58–64.
Pravoporiadok i pravovyi rezhym v Ukraini. Naukova monohrafiia / Ker. avt. Kolektyvu A.O. Selivanov. Kyiv: Lohos, 2022. S. 61. 292 s.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nataliia Parkhomenko, Tetiana Tarakhonych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.