Access to justice through the prism of uniformity of judicial practice in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.6.10Keywords:
access to justice, uniformity of judicial practice, case law, Supreme CourtAbstract
Different perception of relatively new concepts is one of the challenges of implementation of the new terminology in Ukraine. So, the purpose of this article is to study the interconnection of two concepts – the ‘access to justice’ and ‘uniformity of judicial practice’, – keeping in mind the European standards set in Rule of Law Report, CCEJ Opinion No. 20 and in ECtHR case law. Both concepts were in the focus of a number of studies during last decade, however, the interconnections between them was not considered specifically. Also, many publications confirmed that the critical approach to the past (both Soviet as well as pre-Soviet, meaning imperial Russian) was not predominant; examples of this is quoting the Rule of Law Report, Consultative Council of European Judges Opinion No. 20 (2017) and ECtHR jurisprudence alongside works of Russian imperial jurists thus many Ukrainian legal scholars were eager to find “deeper roots” in many modern concepts in the works of Russian scholars of XIX-XX century. Therefore, it is crucial that such concepts as ‘access to justice’ are used correctly. The findings show that the uniformity of judicial practice by ensuring stability and predictability, promotes access to justice, especially in so-called “classic” cases, regulated by longstanding legislation. However, modern world and life in it is quite dynamic, social relationships constantly develop and new legal disputes (due to technological progress or caused by the Russian armed aggression against Ukraine) arise for which there is no case law at all. After the full scale invasion an obvious question arises about how the judicial practice will develop to ensure access to justice in new category of cases, both civil (i.e. regarding compensation of damage caused to the real estate) and criminal, compared to those that were happened since 2014 and were classified as terrorist or general criminal, although some of them had signs of war crimes. In this context, the leadership role of the Supreme Court is important, given its mandate to ensure the uniformity of judicial practice and keeping in mind the dynamic character of the legal relations.
References
Consultative Council of European Judges. Opinion No. 20 (2017). The role of courts with respect to the uniform application of the law. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/opinion-ccje-en-20/16809ccaa5.
Handbook on European law relating to access to Justice. Luxemburg: Publication Office of the European Union, 2016.
Nejdet Şahin and Perihan Şahin v. Turkey. ECtHR. Application no. 13279/05, [GC] judgment of 20 October 2011. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107156 .
Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v Romania. ECtHR. Application no. 76943/11, [GC] judgment of 29 November 2016. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169054.
Report on the rule of law. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011). CDL-AD (2011)003rev. Retrieved from: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e.
Demenchuk M.O. Rol Verkhovnoho Sudu u zabezpechenni yednosti sudovoi praktyky v Ukraini: avtoref. dys kand. yuryd. nauk, spets. 12.00.10. [The role of the Supreme Court in ensuring the unity of judicial practice in Ukraine. Thesis for dissertation for obtaining the Ph.D. in law (12.00.10).]. Odesa, 2018. [in Ukrainian].
Demenchuk M.O. Rol Verkhovnoho Sudu u zabezpechenni yednosti sudovoi praktyky : monohrafiia. [The role of the Supreme Court in ensuring the unity of judicial practice: monograph]. Odesa: Feniks, 2019. 176 p. [in Ukrainian].
Shylo, O.H., & Hlynska, N.V. (2020). The role of the Supreme Court in the mechanism of ensuring the sustainability and unity of judicial practice: some aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(3), 128-141. DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.27(3).2020.128-141.
Shylo O.H., & Hlynska, N.V. (2020). Legal means of procuring the unity application of the criminal procedure law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(2), 156-169. DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.27(2).2020.156-169.
Konferentsiia “Iednist sudovoi praktyky: pohliad Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny ta Verkhovnoho Sudu” (14–15 chervnia 2019 roku) [Conference “Uniformity of judicial practice: the view of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court” (June 14-15, 2019)]. Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pokazniki-diyalnosti/konferencii/konferencia_2019_06_14.
Onlain-konferentsiia “Zabezpechennia yednosti sudovoi praktyky: pravovi pozytsii Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu ta standarty Rady Yevropy” (20 lystopada 2020 roku) [Online conference “Ensuring the uniformity of judicial practice: legal positions of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court and standards of the Council of Europe” (November 20, 2020)]. Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pokazniki-diyalnosti/konferencii/2020_11_20_online_konf_vp.
Konferentsiia “Iednist sudovoi praktyky: pohliad Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny ta Verkhovnoho Sudu” (14–15 chervnia 2019 roku) [Conference “Uniformity of judicial practice: the view of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court” (June 14-15, 2019)]. Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/progr_1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Konferentsiia “Iednist sudovoi praktyky: pohliad Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny ta Verkhovnoho Sudu” Den 1 [Conference “Uniformity of judicial practice: the view of the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court” Day 1]. 14 June 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5MTaoMpj7Y.
Komarov, V.V., & Tsuvina, T.A. (2021). International standard of access to justice and subject of civil procedural law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 28(3), 197–208.
Macdonald, R. (2005). Access to justice in Canada today: Scope, Scale and Ambitions. In J. Bass, W.A. Bogart, & F.H. Zemans (Eds.), Access to justice for a new century: The way forward (pp. 19-112). Toronto: Law Society of Upper Canada.
Bailey, J., Burkell, J., Reynolds, G. (2013). Access to justice for all: towards an “expansive vision” of justice and technology. 31 Windsor Y B Access Just, 181–207.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD Riga Global Access to Justice Roundtable Session Notes. Riga, Latvia.
Sackville, R. (2004). Some Thoughts on Access to Justice. 2 NZJPIL, 85-111.
U Kyievi vidbulosia pershe obhovorennia natsionalnoi dyskusii “Dostup do pravosuddia: realii ta perspektyvy” [The first discussion of the national debate “Access to justice: realities and prospects” took place in Kyiv]. Council of judges of Ukraine. 24 November 2020. Retrieved from: https://rsu.gov.ua/en/news/v-kievi-vidbulosa-perse-obgovorenna-nacionalnoi-diskusii-dostup-do-pravosudda-realii-ta-perspektivi [in Ukrainian].
Dostup do pravosuddia: obhovoryly realii ta perspektyvy [Access to justice: realities and prospects were discussed]. Retrieved from: https://sud.ua/ru/news/ukraine/185949-dostup-do-pravosuddya-obgovorili-realiyi-ta-perspektivi [in Ukrainian].
Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv : Zakon Ukrainy vid 2 chervnia 2016 roku No. 1402-VIII [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges: Law of Ukraine No. 1402-VIII dated 2 June 2016]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#n1589 [in Ukrainian].
Pro vnesennia zmin do Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta inshykh zakonodavchykh aktiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 3 zhovt. 2017 No. 2147-VIII [On Amendments to the Economic Code of Ukraine, Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts: Law on Ukraine No. 2147-VIII dated 3 October 2017]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147-19#n6 [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 19 zhovtnia 2022 r. u spravi No. 420/5/22, administratyvne provadzhennia No. K/990/20141/22 [Resolution of the Supreme Court of 19 October 2022 in case No. 420/5/22, administrative proceedings No. K/990/20141/22]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/106840444 [in Ukrainian].
Maliar A. Prytiahnennia do kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti v Ukraini za vchynennia voiennykh zlochyniv i zlochyniv proty liudianosti v period mizhnarodnoho zbroinoho konfliktu. V kn: Voienni zlochyny na Donbasi. Vyklyky v aspekti prytiahnennia vynnykh do vidpovidalnosti. [Prosecution of war crimes and crimes against humanity during the international armed conflict in Ukraine. In: War crimes in Donbas. Challenges in the aspect of bringing the culprits to justice]. Kyiv, Moscow, 2020. 12–18. [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho sudu vid 4 veresnia 2019 r. u spravi No 265/6582/16- ц, provadzhennia No. 14-17ц19 [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of 4 September 2019 in case No. 265/6582/16-ц, proceedings No. 14-17ц19]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86310215 [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 4 bereznia 2020 r. u spravi № 237/557/18-ц; provadzhennia No. 61-47151св18 [Resolution of the Civil Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court of 4 March 2020 in case No. 237/557/18-ц; proceedings No. 61-47151св18]. Retrieved from: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88337626 [in Ukrainian].
Ukraine and the Netherlands v. Russia. ECtHR. Applications nos. 8019/16, 43800/14 and 28525/2, [GC] decision of 30 November 2022. Retrieved from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222889.
Palombella, G. (2021). Access to Justice: Dynamic, Foundational, and Generative. Ratio Juris. Vol. 34 No. 2 June 2021 (121–138).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tetyana Fuley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
