Law of the Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland: concerning reform and problems of independence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2023.6.16

Keywords:

Republic of Poland, Constitutional Tribunal, independence of court, rule of law

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the development of the law of the Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland in terms of its constitutional and legislative status, as well as the problems associated with the constitutional crisis. Special attention is paid to legislative measures aimed at weakening the body of constitutional jurisdiction in Poland, in particular, a significant reduction in guarantees of the independence of the Constitutional Tribunal.

It was concluded that the law of December 22, 2015, the method of its adoption and entry into force demonstrates an attempt to remove it from the mechanisms of constitutional control (lack of time “distance” between official promulgation and entry into force). On the other hand, its content provides a set of means that encroach on the independence of the Tribunal, including: 1) a quorum of 13 out of 15 judges (there were 12 active judges); 2) the general condition for approval of decisions is at least two-thirds of votes; 3) minimum terms for the initiation of case consideration, which make the urgency of case consideration impossible; 4) giving the president and the minister of justice the right to initiate disciplinary proceedings against a judge; 5) participation of the Seimas in the termination of a judge’s The above means, in combination with the means provided by the law of November 19, 2015 (which terminated the powers of the chairman and deputy chairman of the Constitutional Tribunal), indicate the use of the legal instrument outside the rule of law.

Regarding the directions of limiting the guarantees of independence of the Constitutional Tribunal, increasing its politicization through the use of the instrument of the law. The nature of such means revealed the intention of the legislator to take them beyond the limits of constitutional control and to sharply limit and complicate the work of the Constitutional Tribunal. This approach shows a potential threat from the parliamentary majority to use a special law on the constitutional court to narrow the effectiveness of the institution of constitutional control.

References

Zakomorna K. O. The role of the Constitutional Tribunal in changes to the constitutional legal order of the Republic of Poland. K. O. Zakomorna Problems legality 2012. Issue 118. P. 231–242. Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pz_2012_118_28.

Drachov O. V. The Polish Constitutional Tribunal and international treaties. Law Forum. 2010. No. 4. P. 326–332. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index.

Maryniv I. I. The Constitutional Tribunal in the sense of Art. 10 and Art. 173 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Actual problems of law: theory and practice. 2010. No. 18. P. 410–415. URL: http:nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/app_2010_18_59.

Marinov I. I. Constitutional control in the Republic of Poland: monograph of I. I. Marinov; National Yaroslav Mudry University of Law, Academician of Ukraine. Kh.: Pravo, 2013. 159 c. Bibliography: p. 143–159 ukp.

Maryniv I. I. Constitutional control in the Republic of Poland: autoref. thesis ... candidate law Sciences: 12.00.02; MONMS Ukraine, National Ya. Mudry University of Law, Academician of Ukraine. Kh., 2012. 20 c. ukp.

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. URL: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU19970780483.

USTAWA z dnia 25 june 2015 r. o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym (Dz. U. poz. 1064). URL: http://trybunal.gov.pl/o-trybunale/akty-normatywne/ustawa-o-trybunale-konstytucyjnym.

USTAWA z dnia 19 listopada 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym. URL: file:///C:/Users/www/Downloads/D2015000192801.pdf.

Constitutional crisis in Poland, 2015-2016. URL: https://www.hfhr.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/HFHR_The-constitutional-crisis-in-Poland-2015-2016.pdf.

Judgment 3 December 2015 Ref. No. K 34/15 URL: http://trybunal.gov.pl/en/hearings/judgments/art/8748-ustawa-o-trybunale-konstytucyjnym.

Judgment of 9 December 2015 Ref. No. K 35/15. URL: http://trybunal.gov.pl/en/hearings/judgments/art/8792-nowelizacja-ustawy-o-trybunale-konstytucyjnym.

Ustawa z dnia 22 grudnia 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym. URL: file:///C:/Users/www/Downloads/D2015000221701.pdf.

Wyrok z dnia 9 marca 2016 r. sygn. act K 47/15. URL: http://ipo.trybunal.gov.pl/ipo/Sprawa?sprawa=16641&dokument=13819.

Opinion on Amendments to the Act of 25 June 2015 on the Constitutional. Tribunal of Poland. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Plenary Session (Venice, March 11-12, 2016). URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2016)001-e.

Byelov D., Bielova M. Evidence and proving in constitutional proceedings: doctrinal aspects. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. Issue 1. 2023. p. 22–26.

Bielova M.V., Byelov D.M. The influence of Roman law on the modern change of the legal paradigm. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. Issue 4. 2023. p. 29–35.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-14