Humanistic principles of the legal system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.3.4Keywords:
principle of humanism, rule of law, human rights, system of law, moral principles of societyAbstract
The study focuses on the study of the principle of humanism as a key element of the modern legal state. The author traces the evolution of the humanistic concept from ancient times to the present, emphasizing its defining role in the formation of legal systems and state policy.
The article reveals the essence of the concept of “principle” in the legal context. Emphasis is placed on the systematicity, interrelationship, and hierarchy of the principles of law, which is crucial for understanding their functions in the legal system.
The analysis of the principle of humanism as an end-to-end component of the legal system occupies a central place in the research. Its main aspects are considered: the value of the individual, respect for dignity, ensuring rights and freedoms, orientation towards the common good. It is emphasized that humanism in law is not only an ethical ideal, but also a practical guideline for law-making and law enforcement.
The author explores the dialectical opposition of humanism and anti-humanism, which allows for a deeper understanding of the dynamic nature of humanistic principles and their influence on the development of the rule of law. Emphasis is placed on the need for constant critical analysis of existing norms and institutions regarding their compliance with humanistic ideals.
An important aspect of the work is the analysis of the relationship between the moral maturity of society and the realization of the principle of humanism. It is argued that in a morally developed society, respect for the rights and freedoms of the individual becomes an integral part of everyday life, creating harmony between ethical principles and legal norms.
The conclusions emphasize the importance of not only the legislative enshrining of humanistic principles, but also their practical implementation in all spheres of social life. This involves the constant improvement of the legal system and state administration for the maximum satisfaction of the needs and interests of citizens, which is a defining feature of a truly legal and democratic state.
References
Hromovchuk M.V., Byelov D.M., Pryntsyp humanizmu, yak osnovopolozhnyi pryntsyp pobudovy suchasnoi pravovoi derzhavy. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia Pravo. 2021. Vypusk 65. S. 46–50. [in Ukrainian]
Hromovchuk M.V., Byelov D.M. Humanizm yak filosofsko-pravova katehoriia v umovakh formuvannia novoi paradyhmy v pravi. Analitychno-porivnialne pravo. №3/2022. S. 301–310. [in Ukrainian]
Byelova M., Farcash I.-M., Byelov D., The principle of humanism and its content in the conditions of the formation of the newest social paradigm. European Socio-Legal and Humanitarian Studies. 2022. Issue 1. Р. 30–43. [in English]
Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv; za red. O.S. Melnychuk. K., 1974. 1044 s. [in Ukrainian]
Starchuk O.V. Shchodo poniattia pryntsypiv prava. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. 2012. № 2. S. 40–43. [in Ukrainian]
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press. 334 р. [in English]
Barak, A. (2012). Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations. Cambridge University Press. 408 р. [in English]
Kumm, M. (2010). The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review. Law & Ethics of Human Rights. 4(2). Р. 142–175. [in English]
Raz, J. (2009). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 410 s. [in English]
Kolisnichenko V.V. Suchasna yurydychna nauka pro klasyfikatsiiu pryntsypiv prava Yevropeiskoho soiuzu: krytychnyi analiz. URL: http://vuzlib.com/content/view/1522/92/ [in Ukrainian]
Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk / V. I. Shynkaruk (holova redaktsii). K.: Abrys, 2002. 742 s. [in Ukrainian]
Tseliev O.V. Humanizm ta pryntsypy verkhovenstva prava na prykladi prava na hromadsku nepokoru. Naukovyi visnyk KhNU. 2009. № 2. S. 5–8. [in Ukrainian]
Kostytskyi M.V. Humanizm prava yak proiav vyshchykh (kosmichnykh) zakoniv u suspilstvi. Pryntsypy humanizmu ta verkhovenstva prava yak umova rozvytku demokratychnoi, sotsialnoi, pravovoi derzhavy (pamiati profesora V. V. Kopieichykova): Materialy mizhvuz. nauk.-teoret. konf. K.: Kyiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2009. S. 13–15. [in Ukrainian]
Pohrebniak S.P. Vtilennia pryntsypu humanizmu v pravi. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. 2007. № 1. S. 33–42. [in Ukrainian]
Momot M.O. Dialektyka spravedlyvosti ta humanizmu v pravotvorchosti. Pravo i suspilstvo. 2010. № 3. S. 24–29. [in Ukrainian]
Kozodaiev S.P., Byelov D.M., Bysaha Yu.M., Hromovchuk M.V. Zakhyst konstytutsiinykh prav i svobod liudyny u protsesi provedennia biomedychnykh doslidzhen: monohrafiia. DVNZ «Uzhhorod. nats. un-t», In-t derzhavy i prava krain Yevropy. Uzhhorod, 2018. 177 s. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dmytro Byelov, Myroslava Bielova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
