Principles of use of artificial intelligence in justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.5.4Keywords:
principles, artificial intelligence, justice, rule of law, human rightsAbstract
The scientific article highlights legislative and theoretical approaches to determining the principles of using artificial intelligence in justice as technologies that occupy an increasingly important place and open up new opportunities for improving the judicial system, increasing the efficiency, transparency and accessibility of justice. It was found that the use of artificial intelligence in justice can become uncontrollable and unpredictable for a person, and therefore defining the limits of its use will minimize existing risks, including: violation of human rights, freedoms and interests, damage to the authority of the judiciary, etc. It is emphasized that the introduction of artificial intelligence must necessarily be carried out in compliance with the principles of justice (for example, the rule of law). In addition, the European Commission on Judicial Efficiency, taking into account a number of ethical, legal and other issues, approved the principles that must be followed in the case of the use of artificial intelligence in the judiciary. In particular, the work reveals the content of such principles of the use of artificial intelligence in judicial proceedings as: observance of basic human rights, non-discrimination, quality and safety of court decisions, compliance with Art. 6 of the Convention on the Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as transparency, impartiality and fairness. At the same time, it is stated that artificial intelligence technologies used in justice carry the risks of disclosure of confidential data about a person, their discrimination on various grounds (such as the COMPAS program used in the USA), making unfair decisions due to errors in artificial intelligence algorithms, etc., and therefore one of the of the main principles compared to those indicated should be the use of artificial intelligence technologies in justice exclusively under human control. It was concluded that the gradual development of artificial intelligence technologies in justice will necessarily be accompanied by the emergence of new risks of their use by both judges, court employees, and parties, participants in a court case, which confirms the need for further study of the specified issue with the aim of revising the existing principles, supplementing their list with new ones and as a result of minimizing the harm that can be caused.
References
Opinion No.(2011)14 of the CCJE “Justice and information technologies (IT)”. URL: https://rm.coe.int/168074816b.
Martsenko N., (2019) Pravovyi rezhym shtuchnoho intelektu u tsyvilnomu pravi. [Legal regime of artificial intelligence in civil law]. Actual problems of jurisprudence – Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva. № 4, 91–98 [in Ukrainian].
Kravchuk V., (2019) Content of the principle of legal certainty as a necessary component of the rule of law [Zmist pryntsypu pravovoi vyznachenosti yak neobkhidnoi skladovoi verkhovenstva prava]. Actual problems of jurisprudence – Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva. № 4(20), 10–15 [in Ukrainian].
Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449. URL: https://oecd.ai/en/assets/files/OECD-LEGAL-0449-en.pdf.
Lutska G.V., (2020) Principles of using artificial intelligence in the civil process while ensuring the protection and protection of the rights of Ukrainian citizens living in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine [Pryntsypy vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu v tsyvilnomu protsesi pry zabezpechennia okhorony ta zakhystu prav hromadian Ukrainy, yaki prozhyvaiut na tymchasovo okupovanykh terytoriiakh Ukrainy]. Legal science – Yurydychna nauka. № 2(104), 565–572 [in Ukrainian]
Ukhvala Kasatsiinoho hospodarskoho sudu v skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 08.02.2024 r. u spravi № 925/200/22 [Resolution of the Commercial Cassation Court as a part of the Supreme Court dated February 8, 2024. in сase No. 925/200/22] // Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified State Register of Court Decisions]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/116984639.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment (2018). URL: https://rmcoe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december2018/16808f.
Petriv O. Rol shtuchnoho intelektu v modernizatsii sudovoi systemy: instrumenty dlia suddiv [The role of artificial intelligence in the modernization of the judicial system: tools for judges] // Tsentr demokratii ta verkhovenstva prava [Center for democracy and the rule of law]. 2024. URL: https://cedem.org.ua/consultations/shtuchnyi-intelekt-sud/.
Bernaziuk Ya. Shtuchnyi intelekt yak osnova tsyfrovoho sudochynstva: pomichnyk chy maibutnii konkurent suddi? [Artificial intelligence as the basis of digital justice: assistant or future competitor of the judge?] 2024. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/2024_prezent/artificial_intelligence_bernaziuk.pdf.
Okrema dumka cuddi Kasatsiinoho hospodarskoho sudu v skladi Verkhovnoho sudu vid 08.02.2024 r. u spravi № 925/200/22 [Separate opinion of the judge of the Commercial Cassation Court as a part of the Supreme Court dated February 8, 2024. in case No. 925/200/22] // Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified State Register of Court Decisions]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/117074064.
Rise of the racist robots – how AI is learning all our worst impulses. The Guardian. 2017. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/inequality/2017/aug/08/rise-of-the-racist-robots-how-ai-is-learning-all-our-worst-impulses.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689 [in English].
Lotysh T.V., (2024) Application of artificial intelligence in motivating court decisions in criminal proceedings: international experience and prospects for Ukraine [Zastosuvannia shtuchnoho intelektu pry motyvuvanni sudovykh rishen u kryminalnomu protsesi: mizhnarodnyi dosvid ta perspektyvy dlia Ukrainy]. Journal “ScienceRise: Juridical Science”. № 1(27), 52–57 [in Ukrainian].
Kovalchuk O.Ya., (2024) Theoretical principles of overcoming ethical challenges of using artificial intelligence in the judiciary [Teoretychni zasady podolannia etychnykh vyklykiv vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u sudochynstvi]. Scientific notes. Series: Law – Naukovi zapysky. Seriia: Pravo. Issue 16, 217–221 [in Ukrainian].
Paskar A., (2023) Ethical aspects of the use of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: the way to ensure human rights [Etychni aspekty vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu u sudochynstvi: shliakh zabezpechennia prav liudyny]. Ehrlich’s Journal – Erlikhivskyi zhurnal. Issue 7, 68–75 [in Ukrainian].
Kuzmenko O.V., Chorna V.G., Ostrovsky S.O., (2024) Legal regulation of introduction and use of artificial intelligence [Pravove rehuliuvannia zaprovadzhennia ta vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu]. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law – Kyivskyi chasopys prava. № 1, 173–177 [in Ukrainian].
Radutny O.E., (2017) Criminal liability of artificial intelligence [Kryminalna vidpovidalnist shtuchnoho intelektu]. Information and Law – Informatsiia i pravo. № 2(21), 124–131 [in Ukrainian].
Cerka P., Grigiene J., Sirbikyte G., (2015) Liability for Damages Caused by Artificial Intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review. № 31(3), 376–389 [in English].
Zhornokuy Yu.M., (2020) Artificial intelligence: the issue of responsibility at the current stage of the doctrine’s development [Shtuchnyi intelekt: pytannia vidpovidalnosti na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku doktryny]. Law forum – Forum prava. № 79(2), 118–127 [in Ukrainian].
Chernykh O., (2023) Problems of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in court procedures within the framework of the Ukraine-EU action plan. Artificial Intelligence. № 28(2), 27–31 [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandr Bessonov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.