Virtual assets as a taxable object: directions of legal regulation and key principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.5.11Keywords:
legal regulation, principles, directions, virtual assets, taxationAbstract
The article examines the directions and principles of legal regulation of virtual assets in Ukraine, taking into account their specifics as an object of taxation. The constitutional, tax, administrative, criminal and civil aspects of regulation that ensure the integration of virtual assets into the national legal system are considered. Key challenges and problems are identified, in particular the lack of clear taxation mechanisms, the need to harmonize national legislation with international standards, as well as the issue of ensuring transparency, consumer protection and state sovereignty in the financial sector. Particular attention is paid to the principles of legal regulation, in particular legitimacy, transparency, technological and tax neutrality, adaptability of legislation and international cooperation. It is noted that a comprehensive approach to the regulation of virtual assets will contribute to the effective functioning of the digital economy, attracting investments, protecting the rights of owners and developing innovative technologies. The emphasis is on the importance of ensuring the harmonization of the regulatory framework with constitutional principles and international standards. The role of criminal law regulation in combating fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing is emphasized. The need to create legal mechanisms for resolving disputes, licensing activities related to virtual assets, and implementing effective control over financial transactions is also considered. The author concludes that the implementation of legal frameworks focused on the rapid changes in the digital economy will allow Ukraine to ensure the stability of the financial system, increase the competitiveness and effectiveness of state economic policy in the field of virtual assets.
References
Boniak, V. O. (2017). Metodolohichnyi analiz suchasnykh interpretatsii poniattia «konstytutsiino-pravove rehuliuvannia» [Methodological analysis of modern interpretations of the concept of «constitutional-legal regulation»]. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii: Spetsvypusk (Ch. 2), 19–23. [in Ukrainian]
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 roku № 254k/96-VR (1996). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian]
Andriievskyi, K. V. (2013). Deiaki osoblyvosti metodu pravovoho rehuliuvannia u podatkovomu pravi Ukrainy [Some features of the method of legal regulation in the tax law of Ukraine]. Pravovyi visnyk Ukrainskoi akademii bankivskoi spravy, (1(8)), 25–30. [in Ukrainian]
Kolomoiets, T. O., Kremova, D. S., & Kolpakov, V. K. (2022). Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia realizatsii ekonomichnoi funktsii derzhavy ta ekonomichna funktsiia administratyvnoho prava: pytannia spivvidnoshennia [Administrative and legal regulation of the implementation of the economic function of the state and the economic function of administrative law: issues of correlation]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal, (2), 198–201. [in Ukrainian]
Ivanchenko, O. M. (2022). Lehitymnist prava yak osnova pravovoho poriadku derzhavy [The legitimacy of law as the basis of the legal order of the state]. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii, (1), 14–19. [in Ukrainian]
Kostiuchenko, Ya. M. (2017). Pryntsyp «prozorosti» yak osnovopolozhnyi ta naskriznyi v Uhodi pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu ta YeS [The principle of “transparency” as a fundamental and pervasive principle in the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 44(2), 148–151. [in Ukrainian]
Nesterovych, V. F. (2016). Pryntsypy vidkrytosti ta prozorosti v diialnosti orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady yak peredumova utverdzhennia demokratii uchasti [Principles of openness and transparency in the activities of public authorities as a prerequisite for the establishment of participatory democracy]. Filosofski ta metodolohichni problemy prava, 2(12), 67–76. [in Ukrainian]
Gagliani, G. (2020). Cybersecurity, technological neutrality, and international trade law. Journal of International Economic Law, 23(3), 723–745. [in English]
Baranova, V. H. (2014). Podatkova systema [Tax system]. Odesa. [in Ukrainian]
Lukianenko, O. V. (2009). Teoretychnyi aspekt neitralnosti u mizhnarodnomu opodatkuvanni [The theoretical aspect of neutrality in international taxation]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 5(1), 149–152. [in Ukrainian]
Barannik, R. V. (2017). Pryntsypy mizhnarodnoho spivrobitnytstva ta mizhnarodnoi pravovoi dopomohy pid chas kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Principles of international cooperation and international legal assistance in criminal proceedings]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, (2), 11–18. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maksym Krasyliuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.