The prosecutor’s powers to collect evidence at the initial stage of inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.5.20Keywords:
prosecutor, powers, collection of evidence, proof, pre-trial investigation, criminal offence, inquiry, initiation of inquiryAbstract
Given the criminal procedural regulation regarding the peculiarities of the inquiry initiation, as well as the prosecutor’s powers to supervise the observance of laws during the pre-trial investigation in the form of procedural guidance of the pre-trial investigation, the scope and content of the prosecutor’s powers to collect evidence at the beginning of the inquiry are determined and characterized. The article emphasizes that the primary task at the initiation of the inquiry is to appoint a prosecutor to carry out procedural guidance in a particular criminal proceeding in compliance with the requirements provided for in Articles 37, 110, 214 of the CPC of Ukraine. Furthermore, it is established that the prosecutor’s powers to collect evidence at the initiation of the inquiry are exercised by: checking compliance with the terms and procedure for initiating criminal proceedings established by criminal procedure legislation; and finding out whether the preliminary criminal law qualification of a criminal offence is correct and whether it corresponds to the circumstances of the offence; determining the jurisdiction and verifying the rules of compliance with the rules of jurisdiction for conducting a pre-trial investigation in the form of an inquiry; determining the scope of circumstances to be proved at the initial stage of a pre-trial investigation of a criminal offence and the procedural methods of their collection; determining compliance with the requirements for the grounds and procedural order of urgent investigative (search) and other procedural actions aimed at establishing circumstances important for criminal proceedings; responding to detected violations of the law from the moment of receipt of information (application, notification or self-detection) about a criminal offence; deciding on the consolidation or separation of pre-trial investigation materials; cancellation of unlawful or unjustified decisions of inquirers; direct participation in conducting/independently conducting certain procedural actions aimed at identifying, recording, seizing and examining evidence; giving instructions, orders to the inquirer, the head of the inquiring body or other subjects of evidence during the inquiries.
References
Balov P.O. (2023). Osoblyvosti diznannya yak sproshchenoyi formy dosudovoho rozsliduvannya kryminalʹnykh prostupkiv [Peculiarities of inquiry as a simplified form of pretrial investigation of criminal misdemeanors]. Analitychno-porivnyalʹne pravoznavstvo, (5), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.05.92 [in Ukrаinian].
Shchodo sproshchennya kryminalʹnoho pravosuddya [Regarding the simplification of criminal justice]: Rekomendatsiya Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam (17.09.1987 No 6 R (87) 18). http://zakonZ.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_339 [in Ukrаinian].
Kryminalʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]: zakon Ukrayiny (13.04.2012 No. 4651–VI). Vidomosti Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny, (9-10, 1112, 13), 88 [in Ukrаinian].
Marchenko O.A. (2021). Osoblyvosti dosudovoho rozsliduvannya kryminalʹnykh prostupkiv u formi diznannya: deyaki protsesualʹni aspekty [Peculiarities of pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses in the form of inquiry: some procedural aspects]. Pivdennoukrayinsʹkyy pravnychyy chasopys, (3’2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2021.3.2.8 [in Ukrаinian].
Chornyy A.M. (2023). Diznannya yak forma dosudovoho rozsliduvannya kryminalʹnoho prostupku [Discovery as a form of pretrial investigation of a criminal offense]. Pivdennoukrayinsʹkyy pravnychyy chasopys, (1), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2023.1.22 [in Ukrаinian].
Shchepotkin V.V. (2022). Ohlyad sudovoyi praktyky palat i obʹyednanoyi palaty Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu u skladi Verkhovnoho Sudu. Rishennya, vneseni do YеDRSR, za 2021 rik [Review of the judicial practice of the chambers and the combined chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation as part of the Supreme Court. Decisions submitted to the USRCD for 2021]. 88 [in Ukrаinian].
Pro orhanizatsiyu diyalʹnosti prokuroriv u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni [On the organization of activities of prosecutors in criminal proceedings]: nakaz Ofisu Heneralʹnoho prokurora (30.09.2021 No. 309). Ofis Heneralʹnoho prokurora. https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/nakazi-generalnogo-prokurora-z-osnovnih-napryamiv-prokurorskoyi-diyalnosti [in Ukrаinian].
Zinʹkovsʹkyy I.P. (2021). Osoblyvosti dokazuvannya v khodi diznannya [Peculiarities of proof during inquiry]. Pivdennoukrayinsʹkyy pravnychyy chasopys, (3’1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2021.3.1.18 [in Ukrаinian].
Pro zatverdzhennya Polozhennya pro orhanizatsiyu diyalʹnosti pidrozdiliv diznannya orhaniv Natsionalʹnoyi politsiyi Ukrayiny [On the approval of the Regulation on the organization of the activities of the investigation units of the National Police of Ukraine]: nakaz Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny (20.05.2020 No. 405), zareyestrovano v Ministerstvi yustytsiyi Ukrayiny (03.06.2020 No. 491/34774). Ofitsiynyy visnyk Ukrayiny, (46, 64), 1481 [in Ukrаinian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kostiantyn Shcherbak, Vitalii Romaniuk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.