Concept, characteristics and types of customs disputes related to assessment and collection of customs payments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.6.2

Keywords:

customs disputes, customs payments, customs duties, customs conflict, customs disputes classification, assessment and collection of customs payments

Abstract

This article explores the concept, characteristics, and types of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments. The relevance of this topic arises from the critical role customs payments play in replenishing Ukraine’s state budget, which simultaneously creates risks of rights violations by customs authorities and an imbalance between public and private interests. Currently, the most effective way to protect the violated rights is referring to the court for the purpose of consideration and resolution of the respective customs disputes.

It has been established that conducting scientific inquiries into the administrative and legal aspects of resolving customs disputes regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments requires a solid theoretical and legal foundation, including clear definitions of key concepts. Consequently, the article analyzes terms ranging from general ones (such as “dispute” and “legal dispute”) to more specific ones (such as “customs dispute” and “customs disputes relating to the assessment and collection of customs payments”). The article identifies the essential characteristics of the customs disputes, their causes, preconditions, and offers an original approach to classification of the customs disputes.

Thus, a dialectical relationship has been traced between the concepts of “dispute”, “legal dispute”, “public-law dispute”, “administrative-law dispute”, “customs dispute” and “customs dispute regarding the assessment and collection of customs payments”. It has been established that, unlike other categories of legal disputes, a customs dispute, as a type of administrative-legal dispute, is inherently characterized by conflict, as its participants are private persons/ entities and customs authorities (structural departments of the public administration system). At the same time, it has been concluded that the concepts of “conflict” and “dispute” are not identical. A legal conflict in the customs sphere serves as a prerequisite for initiation and conduct of the proceedings in the customs dispute.

Finally, based on general approaches to the characteristics and types of customs disputes and an analysis of the specific features of customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments, the author suggests his own view towards the list of characteristics and types of the customs disputes. Although the article has a more theoretical rather than a practical focus, similar scientific developments provide for a structural and meaningful impetus for further research into the pressing issues of resolving customs disputes related to the assessment and collection of customs payments.

References

Pryimachenko D. V. Uzahalnennia praktyky rozghliadu sudamy sprav pro porushennia mytnykh pravyl (z urakhuvanniam praktyky Yevropeiskoho Sudu z prav liudyny) [Generalization of the practice of court proceedings in cases of customs violations (considering the practice of the European Court of Human Rights)]. Sudovyi rozghliad podatkovykh ta mytnykh sporiv: problemy, vyklyky ta priorytety (4–5 lypnia 2019 r.) m. Kyiv: zbirnyk materialiv II Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. Kyiv, 2019, p. 327. [in Ukrainian]

Viennikova V. V. Zahalna kharakterystyka poniattia pravovoho sporu ta yoho osoblyvosti u pravi sotsialnoho zabezpechennia [General characteristics of the concept of legal disputes and their peculiarities in social security law]. Pravova doktryna – osnova formuvannia pravovoi systemy derzhavy: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 20-richchiu NAPrN Ukrainy ta obhovorenniu piattom. monohraf. “Pravova doktryna Ukrainy,” Kharkiv, 20–21 lystop. 2013 r. Kharkiv, 2013, pp. 763–766. [in Ukrainian]

Viennikova V. V. Zahalna kharakterystyka poniattia pravovoho sporu ta yoho osoblyvosti u pravi sotsialnoho zabezpechennia [General characteristics of the concept of legal disputes and their peculiarities in social security law]. Pravova doktryna – osnova formuvannia pravovoi systemy derzhavy: materialy Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 20-richchiu NAPrN Ukrainy ta obhovorenniu piattom. monohraf. “Pravova doktryna Ukrainy,” Kharkiv, 20–21 lystop. 2013 r. Kharkiv, 2013, pp. 763–766. [in Ukrainian]

Luchenko D. V. Pro osnovni oznaky administratyvno-pravovoho sporu [On the main features of administrative-legal disputes]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Kharkiv, 2013, No. 2 (73), pp. 148–156. [in Ukrainian]

Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 06.07.2005 r. № 2747-IV. Redaktsiia vid 01.01.2025 r. [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated July 6, 2005, No. 2747-IV. Edition as of January 1, 2025]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2005, No. 35, p. 1358, Art. 446. [in Ukrainian]

Matselik T. O. Administratyvno-pravovyi spir yak katehoriia yurydychnoho sporu [Administrative-legal dispute as a category of legal dispute]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Povitriane i kosmichne pravo. 2010, No. 4, pp. 51–55. [in Ukrainian].

Kalantai M. V. Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia mytnykh sporiv [Administrative-legal regulation of customs disputes]. Dys... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kharkiv, 2020. URL: https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0821U100334 (accessed: 13.01.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Reva V. V. Poniattia i sutnist mytnoho sporu yak vydu publichno-pravovoho sporu [The concept and essence of a customs dispute as a type of public-legal dispute]. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. 2018, Issue 1 (22), Vol. 5, Part 1, pp. 124–127. URL: http://www.pjv.nuoua.od.ua/v1-5_2018/part_1/30.pdf (accessed: 13.01.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Varguliak O. H. Poniattia ta yurydychna konstruktsiia mytno-pravovoho sporu [The concept and legal construction of a customs-legal dispute]. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. No. 4, 2023. URL: http://apnl.dnu.in.ua/4_2023/15.pdf (accessed: 13.01.2025). [in Ukrainian]

Tolstolutska M. Mytnyi spir yak predmet administratyvnoho sudochynstva [Customs dispute as a subject of administrative proceedings]. Visnyk Akademii pratsi, sotsialnykh vidnosyn i turyzmu. No. 2, 2019. URL: https://www.socosvita.kiev.ua/sites/default/files/Visnyk_2_2019-19-26.pdf (accessed: 13.01.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Abdukadyrova K. E. Konflikt u sferi mytnykh pravovidnosyn yak peredumova vynyknennia mytnoho sporu [Conflict in the field of customs legal relations as a prerequisite for the emergence of a customs dispute]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia. 2020, No. 47, Vol. 1, pp. 50–53. [in Ukrainian].

Mytnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.03.2012 r. № 4495-VI. Redaktsiia vid 01.01.2025. [Customs Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated March 13, 2012, No. 4495-VI. Edition as of January 1, 2025]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2012, No. 44–45; No. 46–47; No. 48, p. 1858, Art. 552. [in Ukrainian].

Rishennia u spravi «TOV «Polimerkonteiner» proty Ukrainy» (Zaiava № 23620/05) vid 24.11.2016 r. [Decision in the case “LLC Polimerkonteiner v. Ukraine” (Application No. 23620/05) dated November 24, 2016]. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy. 2017, No. 98, p. 243, Art. 3028. [in Ukrainian].

Zvit shchodo stanu rozghliadu sudamy sprav za uchasti mytnyts Derzhmytsluzhby protyahom 6 misiatsiv 2024 roku. [Report on the state of court proceedings involving customs offices of the State Customs Service during the first six months of 2024]. Derzhavna mytna sluzhba. URL: https://customs.gov.ua/rozgliad-sporiv-u-sudovomu-poriadku (accessed: 13.01.2025). [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-03-30