Intellectual property, artificial intelligence and contract law: are there any intersections and fruitful collaborations between these areas?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.6.5Keywords:
artificial intelligence, intellectual property law, contract law, license agreements, digitalization, rights to input training data, rights to AI-generated outputsAbstract
The article contains an analysis of the two main questions regarding AI and IP law: how shall input data used to train AI-systems and how should output results generated by these systems be protected by IP law? In the context of this analysis particular attention is paid on the role of contractual mechanisms used by private parties to resolve these issues in practice. It is concluded that in the situation of doctrinal and legislative conundrum contracts are often used by AI-operators (developers), AI-users, and rightsholders owning input training data to attribute IP rights to certain persons and to protect these rights. However, contractual mechanisms may not always be a good option. Regarding the issue of IP protection of input data contracts (in particular, licensing agreements) may be a helpful tool to get a permission to use data for AI training purposes and to address other related issues. Meanwhile, considering IP protection of AI generated outputs contracts usually serve as a means to monopolize these outputs by AI-operators and developers with no appropriate justification for this monopolization.
References
Mark Savage. Sir Paul McCartney says artificial intelligence has enabled a ‘final’ Beatles song. 2023. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65881813 (accessed 10 January 2025).
GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models. 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10130 (accessed 10 January 2025).
Biden calls for ‘a fair deal’ for striking screenwriters. Politico, 2023. URL: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/08/biden-fair-deal-striking-screenwriters-00095907 (accessed 10 January 2025).
Picht, Peter Georg; Brunner, Valerie; Schmid, Rena (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law: From Diagnosis to Action. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper 22-08, Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition.
On Copyright and Neighboring Rights: the Law of Ukraine from 1 December 2022 No 2811-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2811-20#n872 (accessed 10 January 2025).
Drexl, Josef and Hilty, Reto and Desaunettes-Barbero, Luc and Globocnik, Jure and Gonzalez Otero, Begoña and Hoffmann, Jörg and Kim, Daria and Kulhari, Shraddha and Richter, Heiko and Scheuerer, Stefan and Slowinski, Peter R. and Wiedemann, Klaus, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law. Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 9 April 2021 on the Current Debate (April 9, 2021). Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 21-10, URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3822924 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3822924 (accessed 10 January 2025).
Bulayenko, Oleksandr and Quintais, João Pedro and Gervais, Daniel J. and Poort, Joost (2022). AI Music Outputs: Challenges to the Copyright Legal Framework. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4072806 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072806 (accessed 10 January 2025).
David W. Opderbeck (2024), Copyright in AI Training Data: A Human-Centered Approach, Oklahoma Law Review. No 76. P. 951–1023.
Carlos Muñoz Ferrandis and Marta Duque Lizarralde (2022) Open sourcing AI: intellectual property at the service of platform leadership. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law. No 13. P. 224–246.
Terms of Service. URL: https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893428-Terms-of-Service (accessed 10 January 2025).
Website Terms and Conditions of Use. URL: https://concord.com/terms/ (accessed 10 January 2025).
Claudio Novelli, Federico Casolari, Philipp Hacker, Giorgio Spedicato, Luciano Floridi (2024). Generative AI in EU law: Liability, privacy, intellectual property, and cybersecurity. Computer Law & Security Review. Volume 55.
Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions. URL: https://www.bakerlaw.com/services/artificial-intelligence-ai/case-tracker-artificial-intelligence-copyrights-and-class-actions/ (accessed 10 January 2025).
17 U.S.C. § 107 , U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 17. Copyrights § 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use.
Gillotte, Jessica (2020). Copyright Infringement in AI-Generated Artworks. UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 53. No. 5, p. 2655–2691.
Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (Text with EEA relevance.) PE/51/2019/REV/1 OJ L 130, 17.5.2019, p. 92–125.
Jane C. Ginsburg & Luke Ali Budiardjo (2019). Authors and Machines. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. Volume 34. Issue 2. P. 343 - 34 BERKELEY TECH. L. J. 343–448.
Jiahong Chen & Paul Burgess (2019). The Boundaries of Legal Personhood: How Spontaneous Intelligence Can Problematise Differences between Humans, Artificial Intelligence, Companies and Animals. Artificial Intelligence law, Volume 27, p. 73.
Moerland, A. (2024). Intellectual Property Law and AI. In E. Lim, & P. Morgan (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Private Law and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 362–383). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108980197.019.
Dornis, T. W. (2021). Of “authorless works” and “inventions without inventor”-the muddy waters of “AI autonomy” in intellectual property doctrine. European Intellectual Property Review. Volume 43(9), p. 570–585.
European Parliament resolution of 20 October 2020 on intellectual property rights for the development of artificial intelligence technologies (2020/2015(INI)) OJ C 404, 6.10.2021, p. 129– 135.
Sec 9(3), 12(7) and 178 of Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents (accessed 10 January 2025).
Maidanyk L. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Sui Generis Right: A Perspective for Copyright of Ukraine? Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Volume 3 (11). P. 144–154.
Open AI Terms of Use. URL: https://openai.com/policies/row-terms-of-use/ (accessed 10 January 2025).
AIVA End User License Agreement. URL: https://www.aiva.ai/legal/1 (accessed 10 January 2025).
Terms and Conditions. URL: https://algotunes.com/policies/ (accessed 10 January 2025).
BOOMY Terms of Use. URL: https://boomy.com/terms (accessed 10 January 2025).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataliia Filatova-Bilous
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
