The use of modern information technologies during elections in developed countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2024.6.13Keywords:
electronic voting systems, blockchain technology, artificial intelligence, electoral processes, developed countries, cybersecurity, digital governance, voter engagement, disinformation monitoring, data privacy, election transparencyAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the use of modern information technologies during elections in developed countries, focusing on how digital innovations have transformed electoral processes. The research examined the adoption of electronic voting systems, biometric identification methods, blockchain-based platforms, and artificial intelligence-driven monitoring tools, highlighting their role in enhancing efficiency, transparency, and voter engagement. The integration of these technologies has led to significant changes in how elections are administered, addressing long-standing challenges related to vote counting accuracy, voter authentication, and combating disinformation.
Considered were the practical applications and challenges associated with deploying advanced technologies in electoral processes across different regions. The analysis revealed that electronic voting systems, particularly Direct Recording Electronic machines and optical scan devices, have improved vote tabulation speed and accuracy while raising cybersecurity concerns requiring robust mitigation strategies. Biometric technologies have been instrumental in reducing voter fraud by enabling quick and reliable voter verification, though they present ethical dilemmas regarding personal data protection.
Investigated were the pivotal success factors and recurring challenges that arise when integrating information technologies into electoral frameworks. Key determinants of successful technology adoption included the establishment of comprehensive legal frameworks that delineate stakeholder responsibilities, sustained financial investment in infrastructure modernization, and the implementation of public awareness campaigns to build voter confidence. The research highlighted how countries like Estonia have pioneered internet voting systems with strong cybersecurity safeguards, while others, such as the United States, have prioritized decentralized approaches with varying levels of technological sophistication across states.
Deserves special attention the ethical, legal, and practical considerations that accompany the digitalization of elections, as the increasing reliance on technology brings both unprecedented opportunities and complex risks. Cybersecurity threats, including hacking, malware attacks, and data manipulation, were identified as pervasive challenges requiring multilayered defense systems and continuous monitoring to safeguard electoral integrity.
References
Antonyan, T., Davtyan, S., Kentros, S., Kiayias, A., Michel, L., Nicolaou, N., Russell, A., & Shvartsman, A.A. (2009). State-wide Elections, Optical Scan Voting Systems, and the Pursuit of Integrity. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 4(4), 597–610. Retrieved from https://voter.engr.uconn.edu/reports-publications/state-wide-elections-optical-scan-voting-systems-and-the-pursuit-of-integrity/ [in English].
Ibáñez, E., Galdámez, N., Estrebou, C., Pasini, A., Chichizola, F., Rodríguez, I., & Pesado, P. (2015). Biometric Identification in Electronic Voting Systems. Journal of Computer Science & Technology, 15(2), 45–56. Retrieved from https://host170.sedici.unlp.edu.ar/server/api/core/bitstreams/f2a69eb0-2bb6-4949-a72a-1638cf0ff026/content [in English].
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557–564. Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8029379 [in English].
Ferrara, E. (2017). Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election. Interorganizational Networks & Organizational Behavior eJournal. Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Disinformation-and-Social-Bot-Operations-in-the-Run-Ferrara/7a6823d16a1dc680c9bdfe03dc4caccbe2e944b6 [in English].
Teslim, B. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Blockchain Voting. ResearchGate. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384569869_INTEGRATING_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_WITH_BLOCKCHAIN_VOTING [in English].
Baringer, A., Herron, M.C., & Smith, D.A. (2020). Voting by Mail and Ballot Rejection: Lessons from Florida for Elections in the Age of the Coronavirus. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 19(3), 289–320. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0658 [in English].
Mildebrath, H. (2024). The Arrival of E-Voting and Campaign Technologies in Europe: Promise, Perils, and Preparedness. European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 762.321. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2024/762321/EPRS_BRI(2024)762321_EN.pdf [in English].
Shahandashti, Siamak F. and Hao, Feng (2016) DRE-ip:A Verifiable E-Voting Scheme without Tallying Authorities. In: ESORICS 2016: Computer Security – ESORICS 2016. European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, 26-30 Sep 2016, GRC, pp. 223-240. Retrieved from: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/117997/ [in English].
Kumar, S., & Walia, E. (2011). Analysis of Electronic Voting System in Various Countries. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 3(5), 1825–1830. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267235287_ANALYSIS_OF_ELECTRONIC_VOTING_SYSTEM_IN_VARIOUS_COUNTRIES [in English].
Ilechukwu, Michelle & Uzoka, Esther & Madubike, Blossom & Ijagbemi, Ayokunle & Chukwu, Chibuzor. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Cybersecurity Challenges and Solutions in Electronic Voting Systems. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387534174_A_Comparative_Analysis_of_Cybersecurity_Challenges_and_Solutions_in_Electronic_Voting_Systems [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oksana Polotnianko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.