Reproductive choice rights in the system of new bioethical human rights

Автор(и)

  • Myroslava Bielova Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, State Educational Service «Uzhgorod National University», Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2077-2342
  • Oleg Byelov Postgraduate Student, Department of Constitutional Law and Comparative Law, State Educational Service «Uzhgorod National University», Україна

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.1.2

Ключові слова:

human rights, reproductive rights, assisted reproductive technologies, artificial insemination, abortion, sterilization, legal status of the embryo, surrogacy, bioethics

Анотація

This article presents an in-depth examination of challenges facing the practical implementation of reproductive rights in contemporary society. Research confirms that reproductive rights constitute a fundamental component of fourth-generation human rights, characterized by autonomous choice of legally permitted behaviors and personal self-determination.

The legal framework governing reproductive rights in Ukraine includes constitutional provisions, Civil and Family Codes, and healthcare legislation. However, the analysis reveals a significant legislative gap - the absence of a unified regulatory document comprehensively addressing reproductive rights, resulting in numerous legal inconsistencies.

The study categorizes reproductive rights into positive rights (such as artificial insemination access) and negative rights (including sterilization and abortion services). Key regulatory issues surrounding assisted reproductive technologies are identified, particularly the lack of clear statutory definitions for critical terms like “infertility,” “embryo,” “surrogacy,” and “genetic parents,” alongside inadequate age restrictions for ART procedures and ambiguous embryo status regulations.

International jurisprudence on sterilization is examined, with specific reference to the V.C. v. Slovakia case, which emphasized the paramount importance of obtaining informed patient consent. The research highlights the problematic imbalance in spousal rights regarding sterilization and abortion decisions, advocating for mandatory consent requirements when procedures could permanently affect a couple’s procreative capacity.

Particular scholarly attention focuses on the embryo’s evolving legal position within reproductive rights discourse, especially relevant given advancing reproductive technologies. The article explores ethical and legal tensions between embryonic right to life considerations and individual reproductive freedoms. The conclusion offers specific recommendations for strengthening reproductive rights legislation in Ukraine.

Посилання

Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16 sichnia 2003 r. № 435-IV URL: zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15.

Simeinyi kodeks Ukrainy. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2002. №№ 21-22. St. 135.

Osnovy zakonodavstva pro okhoronu zdorovia: Zakon Ukrainy vid 19.11.1992 URL: zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2801-12/page2.

Pro zatverdzhennia poriadku zastosuvannia dopomizhnykh reproduktyvnykh tekhnolohii v Ukraini: Nakaz MOZ Ukrainy №787 vid 09.09.2013 roku URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1697-13.

Pro poriadok shtuchnoho pereryvannia vahitnosti vid 12 do 28 tyzhniv: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 12 lystopada 1993r URL: zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/926-93-%D0%BF.

Pro realizatsiiu statti 281 Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 15 liutoho 2006 r. URL: zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/144-2006-%D0%BF.

Postanova YeSPL u spravi V.C. v. Slovachchyna. URL: file:///C:/Users/sl/Downloads/CASE%20OF%20V.C.%20v.%20SLOVAKIA%20-%20[Russian%20Translation]%20by%20the%20Moscow%20Lawyers’%20Club%20(1).pdf.

Jonathan Herring, Death and the Law: The Law Surrounding Death, Dying and the Dead. 2020. 221 р.

Dutko A. O. Zabolotna M.R. Zakriplennia reproduktyvnykh prav osoby u simeinomu zakonodavstvi. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. Yurydychni nauky. 2016. № 845. S. 257-262. URL: nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vnulpurn_2016_845_42.

Kozhan V.V. Osobysti prava ta svobody liudyny: zahalno-teoretychne doslidzhennia: dys. kandydata yurydychnykh nauk: 12.00.01 / teoriia ta istoriia derzhavy i prava; istoriia politychnykh i pravovykh uchen. Lviv 2016. S. 229.

Rebecca J. Cook, Joanna N. Erdman, Bernard M. Dickens (eds.), Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and Controversies. 2014. 221 р.

Lisa Smyth, Abortion and Nation: The Politics of Reproduction in Contemporary Ireland. 2005. 330 р.

Romovska Z. V. Ukrainske simeine pravo: pidruchnyk. K.: Pravova yednist. 2009. 500 s.

Christa Wichterich, Sexual and Reproductive Rights, in Heinrich Böll Foundation (ed.), Contested Terrains: Women’s Rights and Cultural Diversity under Muslim Law and Customary Law, Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation, 2011. 331 р.

Stefanchuk R. O. Poniattia, systema, osoblyvosti zdiisnennia i zakhystu reproduktyvnykh prav fizychnoi osoby. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehonalnoho upravlinnia ta prava. 2004. № 1–2. S. 66–72.

Khazhynskyi R.M. Somatychni prava liudyny: zarubizhnyi ta vitchyznianyi dosvid pravovoi Visnyk Chernivetskoho fakultetu Natsionalnoho universytetu “Odeska yurydychna akademiia”. 2015. S. 23–32.

Fedoroshchak I.M. Pravo na zhyttia v konteksti prav liudyny. Materialy shostoho natsionalnoho konhresu z bioetyky z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu. 27-30 veresnia 2016. Kyiv. S. 43-44.

Zhrechcha E. Bioetyka : pidruchnyk / E. Zhrechcha, A. Dzh. Spaniolo, M. L. di Pietro; per. z ital. V. Y. Shovkun. Lviv : Vydavnytstvo LOBF «Medytsyna i pravo», 2007. 672 s.

Hromovchuk M.V. Prava liudyny: teoretychni i praktychni zasady. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo. 2017. № 2. S. 37–41.

Byelov D.M., Hromovchuk M.V. Systema zakhystu prav i svobod liudyny i hromadianyna: doktyrynalni zasady. Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Seriia “Pravo”. 2017. Vypusk 42. C. 27–31.

Bielova M.V., Bielov O.M. Reproduktyvni prava yak skladova prav chetvertoho pokolinnia: teoretyko-pravovyi analiz. Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Pravo. Vypusk 88. 2025. S. 118–122.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2025-06-06

Номер

Розділ

Статті