Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility: from commitment to strategy

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.1.17

Ключові слова:

corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, social entrepreneurship, sustainable social impact, social support, reputation, environmental sustainability, stakeholders, ethical management practices

Анотація

The paper explores the theory of stakeholders, institutional theory, and the theory of the resource-based view as the basis for the study of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A program of alternative CSR initiatives, aligned with core values and business goals, is proposed to enhance the reputation and strengthen the trust of stakeholders. The decisive role of a transparent communication strategy for the effective communication of CSR efforts, promoting trust and involvement, is noted. Based on empirical data, a positive correlation between CSR activities and the reputation of the organization in various industries is substantiated. Compliance with the standards and principles of socially responsible business by business entities provides them with competitive advantages and opportunities to attract additional investment resources. Integration of CSR into the overall business strategy and activities has ensured its alignment with the organizational culture and decision-making processes, maximizing their impact. Involving stakeholders in program development and evaluation increases the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. The importance of continuous monitoring and assessment of the impact of quantitative and qualitative indicators on CSR, which are successful for improvement and continuous improvement, is noted. Finally, the commitment of management and organizational culture provides decisive forces of CSR, which is why senior managers contribute to a key role in creating an ethical and socially responsible environment that improves the organization’s reputation and sustainability. The results of the study can contribute to the development and implementation of more effective CSR strategies that will improve the reputation and trust of stakeholders, which will ensure the long-term success of the business. Developing a regulatory framework and incentives that encourage responsible corporate behavior can contribute to public welfare. Improving the reputation of an organization allows investors to assess the sustainability and ethics of potential investments, which will lead to more informed decision-making and investment responses. Finally, consumers can make more informed purchasing decisions by choosing to support companies with strong CSR practices and a positive reputation, thereby stimulating appropriate business behavior and impact on society.

Посилання

Edelman. (2022). Edelman Trust Barometer 2022: Global report. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer.

Barnett, M.L. (2008). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review. V. 32(3). P. 794–816. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.

Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. V. 84(12). P. 78–92. URL: https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society.

Statista. (2022). Global reputation index ranking of top companies 2021. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1224129/global-reputation-index-ranking-top-companies.

Jones, T.M., & Wicks, A.C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review. V. 24(2). P. 206–221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928.

Toyota. (2022). Toyota’s corporate overview. URL: https://www.toyota-global.com/company/profile.

Hassan, H. (2018). Corporate reputation and business strategy: Setting the research agenda for the next decade. Corporate Reputation Review. V. 21(1). P. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-017-0041-2.

Safaricom. (2022). About us: Our purpose. URL: https://www.safaricom.co.ke/about.

Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J., & Harris, K.E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs V. 35(1). P. 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x.

Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. V. 84(12). P. 78–92. URL: https://hbr.org/2006/12/strategy-and-society.

Jones, T.M., & Wicks, A.C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review. V. 24(2). P. 206–221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928.

Carroll, A.B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. V. 1(1). P. 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.

Carroll, A.B., & Shabana, K.M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. V. 12(1). P 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. V. 89(1/2). P. 62–77. URL: https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value

Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J., & Harris, K.E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs. V. 35(1). P. 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

Corporate social responsibility – cases of five international companies in Ukraine. URL: https://vctr.media/ua/korporatyvna-soczialna-vidpovidalnist-kejsy-5-mizhnarodnyh-kompanij-v-ukrayini-116074.

Microsoft. (2022). Microsoft CSR report. URL: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility.

Brammer, S., Jackson, G. & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review. V. 10(1). P. 3–28.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O.C. (2011). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing. V. 35(3/4). P. 457–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110382030

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review V. 15(4) P. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00455.x

Johnson & Johnson. (2022). Caring for the world one person at a time. URL: https://www.jnj.com.

Tesla. (2022). Tesla’s mission. URL: https://www.tesla.com/about#mission_statement

Starbucks. (2022). Starbucks global social impact report. URL: https://www.starbucks.com/responsibility/impact.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. V. 5(2). P. 171–180.

Jones, A., & Smith, B. (2017). CSR activities and organizational reputation in the pharmaceutical industry: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. V. 142(4). P. 787–803.

Garcia, R., Martinez, J. M., & Rodriguez, J. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and its impact on organizational reputation in the food and beverage industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management. V. 77. P. 423–431.

Kim, H., & Park, S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational reputation in the retail sector: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. V. 54. P. 102029.

Li, X., Wu, Q., & Xu, H. (2018). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and organizational reputation in the financial services industry: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. V. 9. P. 2285.

Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2016). CEO characteristics and corporate social responsibility: Moderating effects on organizational reputation. Journal of Business Research. V. 69(10). P. 4251–4257.

Alibaba Group. (2022). Alibaba Group Holding Limited: Company overview. URL: https://www.alibabagroup.com/en/global/home.

Zheng, X., Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational reputation in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Sustainability. V. 11(1). P. 144.

Yang, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, and organizational reputation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Ethics. V. 170(4). P. 823–839.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2025-06-06

Номер

Розділ

Статті