The role of ECTHR case law in land law: the experience of Ukraine compared to other states

Authors

  • Volodymyr Paliichuk Postgraduate Student at the Department of Labor, Land and Economic Law, Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5533-8039

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.2.15

Keywords:

European Court of Human Rights, source of law, land law, Ukraine, human rights, ECtHR case law

Abstract

The case law of the European Court of Human Rights plays a varying role in the resolution of land-related legal disputes across different jurisdictions. At the same time, the question of the Strasbourg Court’s influence remains of significant theoretical and practical importance. Under Ukrainian legislation, the case law of the ECtHR is formally recognised as a source of land law. However, approaches to this issue differ substantially across European states. This article examines the role of ECtHR judgments within the Ukrainian legal system, particularly in the context of land law, and provides a comparative analysis with selected European jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, and Germany. The study also identifies key challenges associated with the recognition and application of ECtHR case law as a source of land law in Ukraine.

References

Aida Torres Perez. The Judicial Impact of European Law in Spain: ECHR and EU Law Compared. Yearbook of European Law. Volume 30, Issue 1, 2011. Pages 159–179. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yer006.

Di Martino, A. National Constitutions and the ECHR. Comparative Remarks in Light of Germany’s Experience. In: The Constitutional Relevance of the ECHR in Domestic and European Law: An Italian Perspective. 2013. Pages 119–134. Retrieved from: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/28469-1.pdf.

European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003. Retrieved from https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2003/act/20/enacted/en/pdf.

Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. Judgment of the Second Senate of 14 October 2004 – 2 BvR 1481/04. Retrieved from: https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2004/10/rs20041014_2bvr148104en.html.

Human Rights Act 1998. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents.

Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254к/96-вр [in Ukrainian].

Konventsiya pro zakhyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. (n.d.). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004 [in Ukrainian].

López Guerra, L. Spain and the European Court of Human Rights: Individual Applications and the Recurso de Amparo. Journal of Constitutional Law, 4 (7). 2015. Ankara. Pages 67-83. Retrieved from: https://anayasader.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Lopez-Guerra-AYHD-7.pdf.

Spanish Constitution. https://senado.es. Retrieved from https://www.senado.es/web/conocersenado/normas/constitucion/detalleconstitucioncompleta/index.html?lang=en.

Tsyvilʹnyy protsesualʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine]. (n.d.). zakon.rada. gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15 [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy “Pro vykonannya rishen’ ta zastosuvannya praktyky Yevropeys’koho sudu z prav lyudyny” [The Law of Ukraine “On Execution of Judgments and Application of Practice of the European Court of Human Rights”]. (n.d.). zakon. rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-08-11