The relationship between morality, responsibility and social freedom: a philosophical aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.3.11Ключові слова:
responsibility, crisis of civilization, morality, law, individual freedom, social system, social norm, public moralityАнотація
The article is devoted to the study of the interaction between moral norms,responsibility and social freedom in the context of philosophical aspects. The author analyzes the importance of philosophical aspects that stimulate reasoning about how these aspects interact with each other in modern society. The analysis of philosophical aspects includes the study of the historical development of the concepts of morality and responsibility, as well as their relationship with the concept of social freedom.
This process makes it necessary to take into account the difficulties and contradictions that may arise in the process of understanding and practical application of these concepts. In addition, the study of the philosophical aspect of the relationship between morality, responsibility and social freedom can contribute to the development of more principled and effective approaches to practical issues of modern society.
The purpose of the article is a detailed analysis of the philosophical aspect of the relationship between morality, responsibility and social freedom. To investigate the theoretical connections between these concepts and reveal their impact on society and the individual.
The article analyzes the importance of moral norms as restrictions and at the same time guidelines for the exercise of freedom of choice. It is noted that moral principles are able to narrow the available options in individual cases, setting the boundaries of an individual’s behavior. At the same time, they can serve as a guide, offering a morally acceptable direction for making decisions and implementing actions.
It also examines the conflict that can arise in a person when his moral beliefs collide with other goals or circumstances, and he is forced to choose between them. The author emphasizes that morality is a necessary component of freedom: the exercise of one’s own will by an individual must necessarily take place without infringing on its freedoms and the rights of other individuals. The article emphasizes that freedom is directly related to responsibility: taking into account the general crisis of civilization, the progressive growth of destructive, destructive capabilities of a person as a subject of activity, any reflection on freedom is unthinkable without correlating it with responsibility. The general crisis of the social system and new processes of development of modern society require the development and expression of a new ideological paradigm.
Посилання
Blikhar M.M., Bodnarchuk V.S. Filosofsʹko-pravova obumovlenistʹ realizatsiyi pryntsypiv svobody ta vidpovidalʹnosti u pravookhoronniy diyalʹnosti: monohrafiya. Lʹviv: Liha-pres, 2016. 252 s.
Blikhar V. (2016).Principle of Liability for Moral and Approval of Professional Employees of Law Enforcement (Legal and Philosophical Reflection) / Fìlosofs׳kì ta metodologìčnì problemi prava. 2016. № 2 (12) 252 p. [in Ukrainian].
Husserl E. Kryza yevropeysʹkoho lyudstva i filosofiya / E. Husserl // Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiya. Techiyi ta napryamky. K.: Vakler, 1996. S. 69–83.
Karasʹ A. Avtentichnistʹ ta identychnistʹ v perspektyvi zdiysnennya demokratychnoyi svobody // Stanovlennya novoyi sotsialʹno-kulʹturnoyi diysnosti v Ukrayini: Kolektyvna monohrafiya za zah. red. d-ra filos. nauk, prof. V.P. Melʹnyka. Lʹviv: LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 2017. S. 5–50.
Kant I. Krytyka chystoho rozumu. K.: Yunivers, 2000. 504 s.
Lyakh V.V. Ekzystentsiyna svoboda: vybir i vidpovidalʹnistʹ (Filosofsʹka kontseptsiya Zh.-P. Sartra) // Filosofsʹka i sotsiolohichna dumka. 1995. № 5–6. S. 110–117.
Windelʹband Vilʹhelm // Filosofskyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk / V.I. Shynkaruk (hol. redkol.) ta in.; Instytut filosofiyi imeni Hryhoriya Skovorody NAN Ukrayiny. Kyyiv: Abris, 2002. 742 s.
Harhots А., Shandra B. (2024) The philosophical concept of freedom by J.-P. Sartre //.Science of Europe. Prague:Vol. 4, No. 136, pp. 74-77 [Czech Republic ]. https://www.europe-science.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Sciences-of-Europe-No-136-2024.pdf
##submission.downloads##
Опубліковано
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2025 Bohdana Shandra

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.