Transaction-related grounds for eligibility for tax credit: overview of the case-law of the Supreme Court of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61345/1339-7915.2025.4.6

Keywords:

genuineness of business transactions, sham transaction, source documents, value added tax, tax control, tax credit, value-added tax refund

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the transaction-related grounds for the right to a tax credit that are covered in the case-law of the Supreme Court of Ukraine. The relevance of this topic arises from the fact that there is insufficient cohesion in the scientific literature on the understanding of the whole spectrum of these grounds in their interrelation by administrative courts. As a result of the study, the author points out that the transaction-related grounds for the right to a tax credit are: (1) the genuineness of transactions for the purchase of goods/services; (2) the orientation of these transactions to the increase (preserve) taxpayer’s assets and/or its value, as well as to the creation of conditions for that in the future; (3) using the relevant goods/services in the taxpayer’s business activities and in transactions subject to value-added tax; (4) keeping sufficient record of business transactions in source documents and their congruence with the taxpayer’s contracts. It is also noteworthy, the failure of the taxpayer’s counterparty to fulfill their obligation to pay their value-added tax duties, their registration and management of its activities by figureheads, the lack of material, technical and labor resources for carrying out business transactions and other tax information regarding the taxpayer’s counterparties in the supply chain are circumstances that are not of decisive importance and must be assessed in the context of specific business transactions at the time of specific business transactions and in view of other circumstances that confirm or refute the movement of assets and funds between counterparties. Similarly, presentation of unreliable information in source documents, them being issued by an unauthorized person, incomplete disclosure of some details of business transactions and other deficiencies of source documents do not entail their non-inclusion in tax accounting, if from the set of documents containing information about the business transaction, it is possible to establish the its date, essence and scale, as well as to identify the business actors who participated in the business transaction.

References

Krylov, D. (2024). Realnist hospodarskoi operatsii v podatkovomu pravi: problemy dokazuvannia [Reality of a business transaction in tax law: problems of proof]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 83(2), 268-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2024.83.2.39 [In Ukrainian].

Maletska, I. (2025) Okremi aspekty zastosuvannia sudovoi doktryny realnosti hospodarskoi operatsii [Certain aspects of the application of the judicial doctrine of the genuineness of a business transaction], Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 87 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.89.2.6 [In Ukrainian].

Malinovska, A. (2025). Shchodo zmistu hospodarskykh pravovidnosyn z pidtverdzhennia subiektom hospodariuvannia proiavlennia nalezhnoi obachnosti pry vybori kontrahenta [Content of business relationships with confirmation by the business entity of due diligence in choosing a counterparty]. Ukrainian political and legal discourse, 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15034451 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine (2023, July 10). Suddi Verkhovnoho Sudu vysvitlyly aktualni pytannia shchodo zdiisnennia hospodarskykh operatsii u podatkovykh sporakh [Supreme Court judges highlighted pertinent matters regarding business transactions in tax disputes]. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/news/1449778.

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 7 July 2022, case no. 160/3364/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/105852864 [In Ukrainian].

Tax Code of Ukraine of 2 December 2010 no. 2755-VI. Status as of: 26 November 2025. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17#Text [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 1 December 2021, case no. 140/6978/20. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/101534735 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 6 July 2023, case no. 120/17523/21-a. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/112029915 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 31 January 2011, case no. 21-47a10-a. https://taxlink.ua/ua/court/postanova-verhovnogo-sydy-ykraini-vid-31-01-2011-y-spravi-%E2%84%96-21-47a10/ [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 5 May 2023, case no. 160/15514/20. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/110678480 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 27 July 2020, case no. 826/5911/18. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90804192 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 1 December 2022, case 160/20895/21. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107656492 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 23 October 2020, case no. 815/2126/15. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92385334 [In Ukrainian].

Supreme Court of Ukraine. Judgment of 25 March 2021, case no. 813/2781/17. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/95815498 [In Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2026-02-06