Byron and Ukrainian literature: the problem of influence in the conceptualization by Y. Boyko-Blokhin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2018.146338Keywords:
literary reception, national literature, influence, interliterary interaction, Slavic contextAbstract
The article addresses views of Y. Boyko-Blokhin on reception of Lord Byron's heritage in Ukrainian literature of the XIX century and beginning of the XX century (from the perspective of approach of the expatriate researcher to comparative study of Slavic literatures). The concept of influence in interpretation of Y. Boyko-Blokhin is comprehended and correlated with opinions of modern comparativists. The article substantiates relevance of conclusions of Y. Boyko-Blokhin about the phenomenon of Ukrainian Byronism.
Great importance of the views of Y. Boyko-Blokhin, who developed traditions of national comparative studies, and, at the same time, applied the newest West European methodology, for continuous development of Ukrainian comparative literary criticism, is proved
References
Halych, O. A. (2006). Vitchyzniane literaturoznavstvo druhoi polovyny KhKh stolittia: na shliakhu do obiektyvnosti. Istoriia literaturoznavstva. Chastyna druha: ukrainske literaturoznavstvo. Luhansk, 109–140.
Khorob, S. (2005). Naukovyi universum Volodymyra Derzhavyna // Derzhavyn V. Literatura i literaturoznavstvo (Vybrani teoretychni ta literaturno-krytychni pratsi). Ivano-Frankivsk: Plai, 3–16.
Ilnytskyi, M. (2014). “Male literaturne vidrodzhennia”: literaturna krytyka periodu MURu. Znaky doby i hrani talantu. Kyiv: TOV Vydavnytstvo “KLIO”, 109–128.
Melnyk, V. (1992). Vidrodzhennia maibutnoho. Slovo i chas, 7, 16–17.
Oliinyk, O. (1999). Do 90-riachchia Boika-Blokhyna. Slovo i chas, 3, 41–43.
Scholz, F. (1989). Laudatio für Jurij Bojko-Blochyn aus Anlaß seines 80. Geburtstages am 25. März 1989. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Universitatsverlag, 7–15.
Teteryna, D. (1998). Zhyttia i tvorchist Yuriia Boika-Blokhyna. Miunkhen-Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo imeni Oleny Telihy, 271.
Blokhyn, D. (2017). Epistoliarna spadshchyna Yuriia Boika-Blokhyna. Vol. 3. Miunkhen-Ternopil, 601.
Kopaniuk, M. Yu. (2012). Boiko-Blokhyn (1909–2002) – literaturnyi krytyk. Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 92–99.
Bilokin, S., Boiko, Y. (1992). Zamist peredmovy. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 3–6.
Boiko, Yu. (1981). Do problemy porivnialnoho vyvchennia istorii skhidnoslovianskykh literatur. Vybrane. Vol. 3. Miunkhen, 229–240.
Fylypovych, P. (2008). Bairon (krytychno-biohrafichnyi narys). Literaturoznavchi studii. Komparatyvistyka. Statti. Retsenzii. Cherkasy: Vydavnytstvo BRAMA-UKRAINA, 537–548.
Pavlychko, S. (1989). Bairon i Ukraina. Bairon: Narys zhyttia i tvorchosti. Kyiv: Dnipro, 165–197.
Kuzyk, D. N. (1977). Bairon v ukrainskii dozhovtnevii literaturi. Kyiv.
Boyko-Blochyn, J. Byrons Einfluß auf die russische, ukrainische und polinische Literatur. Gegen den Storm. Ausgewählte Beiträge zur Geschichte der slavischen Literaturen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Universitatsverlag, 28–54.
Boiko, Yu. (1992). Tvorchist Tarasa Shevchenka na tli zakhidnoievropeiskoi literatury. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 11–73.
Kulish, P. O. (1997). Boiko-Blokhyn Yu. Velykyi klasyk ukrainskoi literatury. Miunkhen-Chernivtsi, 50.
Boiko, Yu. (1992). Do problemy rozvytku Frankovoho styliu. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 94–109.
Boiko, Yu. (1981). Estetychni pohliady Lesi Ukrainky ta yii stylovi shukannia. Vybrane. Vol. 3. Miunkhen, 241–286.
Boiko, Yu. (1974). “Kaminnyi hospodar” Lesi Ukrainky. Vybrane. Vol. 2. Miunkhen, 327–362.
Dyurishin, D. (1979). Teoriya sravnitel'nogo izucheniya literatury. Moscow: Progress, 320.
Dima, A. (1977). Principy sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniya. Moscow: “Progress”, 229.
Nalyvaiko, D. (2006). Vstupne slovo. Teoriia literatury y komparatyvistyka. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”, 3–4.
Leksykon zahalnoho ta porivnialnoho literaturoznavstva (2001). Chernivtsi: Zoloti lytavry, 634.
Kovaliv, Yu. I. (2007). Literaturoznavcha entsyklopediia. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr “Akademiia”, 607.
Franko, I. (1981). Internatsionalizm i natsionalizm u suchasnykh literaturakh. Zibrannia tvoriv. Vol. 31. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 33–44.
Reizov, B. (1986). “Istoriya i teoriya literatury”. Leningrad: Nauka, 319.
Veselovskiy, A. (1912). Etyudy i kharakteristiki. Vol. 1. Moscow, 562.
Zhirmunskiiy, V. M. (1978). Bayron i Pushkin. Ripol Klassik, 422.
Huber, K. (1985). Der Byronismus in der Ukrainischen Literatur. Ukrainische Romantic und Neoromantik von dem Hintergrund der europäischen Literatur. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag, 131–140.
Fylypovych, P. (1971). Shevchenko i romantyzm. Literatura. New-York – Melborn: Drukarnia B. Ihnatova v Melborni, 53–75.
Zerov, M. (1990). Poetychna diialnist Kulisha. Tvory. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Dnipro, 247–293.
Franko, I. (1989). Lord Bairon. Zibrannia tvoriv, 29, 282–292.
Nikovskyi, A. (1913). “Don Zhuan” v ukrainskii literaturi. Rada, 7, 2.
Antokol'skiy, P. (1957). Lesya Ukrainka. Poety i vremya. Moscow: Sovetskiy spisatel', 74–81.
Laslo-Kutsiuk, M. (1979). Lesia Ukrainka i Herkhard Hauptman. Velyka tradytsiia. Bukharest, 236–258.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Olga Teterina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
