Geopolitical world structure in the context of global space transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.52070Keywords:
geopolitical structure, globalization, hierarchy, pole, space, world order, power area, typology, transformation, power centerAbstract
In this article it is investigated the question of space typology according to its characteristics and activities. It is analyzed the question of structuring the geopolitical space under the influence of globalization. It is distinguished geopolitical hierarchy of structural elements that form the model of geopolitical world structure. Also it is proposed hypothetical scheme of world order under condition of globalization
References
Marunyak, Ye. (2012). Prostrovi dylemy hlobalizatsiyi ta yikh kontseptualizatsiya. Ukrayins'kyy heohrafichnyy zhurnal, 4, 36–42.
O’Toal, Dzh. (2009). Heopolitika postmoderna? Heopoliticheskye predstavlenyya moderna y za ikh predelamy. Politicheskaya nauka, 1, 178–185.
Zamyatin, D. N. (2001). Heopolitika: osnovnye probleme y itohy razvityya v XX v. Polis, 6, 97.
Bek, U. (2011). Vlada i kontrvlada u dobu hlobalizatsiyi: nova svitova politychna ekonomiya. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 460.
Wallerstein, I. (1982). World-System analysis: Theory and Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage, 109.
Komleva, N. A. (2012). Struktura myrovoho hospodstva. Prostranstvo y vremya, 1, 37–46.
Rosenau, J. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics. Princeton University Press, 480.
Lebedeva, M., Serheev, V. (2005). Mehapolys kak aktor mirovoy politiky. Kosmopolis, 4 (10), 193–200.
Fezerstoun, M., Lesh, S., Robertson, R. (2008). Hlobal'ni modernosti. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 400.
Il'in, Y., Leonova, O. (2013). Teoriya i praktika politicheskoy hlobalistiky. Moscow: Yzd-vo Moskovskoho Unyversiteta, 296.
Hol'tsov, A. H. (2013). Bahatopolyarna heopolitychna a orhanizatsiya svitu: problemy i tendentsiyi formuvannya. Naukovi pratsi MAUP, 3 (38), 30–35.
Mareeva, Yu. (2012). Stratehicheskiy treuhol'nyk «Rossiya – Indyya – KItay» v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh (Teoriya i istorycheskaya praktika). Vestnik MHIMO Unyvepsyteta, 5 (26), 240–249.
Global trends 2030: Alternative world (2012). National Intaligance Counsil Report, 55–59. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/GlobalTrends_2030.pdf
Zhyrar, M. (1996). Indyvydy v mezhdunarodnoy politike. Moscow: Mezhdunarodna pedahohycheskaya akademiya, 204.
Castells, M. (2000). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 590.
Pyrozhnyk, Y. (2008). Heopolitika v sovremennom myre. Minsk: TetraSystems, 272.
Mazur, Y. Y., Chumakova, A. N. (Eds.) (2003). Hlobaystika: Entsyklopediya. Moscow: Raduha, 1328.
Chykharev, Y. A. (2009). Problematika politicheskoho prostranstva i vremeni v sovremennoy politolohii i mezhdunarodnykhiyssledovanyyakh. Politicheskaya nauka, 1, 7–32.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Уляна Ігорівна Рудницька
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
