Преимущества Clean & POROUS TM нового технологического метода обработки поверхности дентальных имплантатов
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.38096Mots-clés :
методы SLA и RBM, имплантаты, остеоинтеграция, структурированная пористая поверхностьRésumé
В статье представлены результаты исследования на SEM и EDS поверхности имплантатов ведущих производителей, обработанных наиболее широко распространенными методами SLA и RBM.
Указаны преимущества и недостатки этих методов. Разработанная компанией Finish Line новая технология обработки поверхности имплантатов Clean&Porous объединяет в себе преимущества поверхностей SLA и RBM методов, исключает их недостатки и дает возможность получить хорошо структурированную и абсолютно чистую поверхность, необходимую для успешной остеоинтеграции.
Références
Pavlenko, A. B., Gorban', S. A., Ilyk, R. R., Shterenberg, B. (2009). Poverhnost' implanta, ejo rol' i znachenie v osteointegracii. Sovremennaja stomatologija, 4, 101–108.
Cochran, D. L., Schenk, R. K., Lussi, A., Higginbottom, F. L., Buser, D. (1998). Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sunblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the conine mandible. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 40 (2), 1–11. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-q
Testori, T., Wiseman, L., Woolfe, S., Porter, S. (2001). A prospective multicenter clinical study of the ossetite implants four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, 193–200.
Esposito, M., Coulthard, P., Thomsen, P., Worthington, H. V. (2005). Interventions for peplacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrone Database Sys Rev, 25, CD003815.
Taba, M., Novaes, A. B., Souza, S. L. S., Grisi, M. F. M., Palioto, D. B., Pardini, L. C. (2003). Radiographic Evaluation of Dental Implants with Different Surface Treatments: An Experimental Study in Dogs. Implant Dentistry, 12 (3), 252–258. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000075580.55380.e5
Esposito, M., Hirsch, J.-M., Lekholm, U., Thomsen, P. (1998). Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci, 106 (1), 527–551. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Andersson, B., Krol, J. J. (1995). A histomorghometric study of screw-shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res, 6 (1), 24–30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
Hansson, S., Norton, M. (1999). The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. Journal of Biomechanics, 32 (8), 829–836. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00058-5
Sanz, R. A., Oyarzún, A., Farias, D., Diaz, I. (2001). Experimental Study of Bone Response to a New Surface Treatment of Endosseous Titanium Implants. Implant Dentistry, 10 (2), 126–131. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
Sanz, R. A., Qyarzum, A., Farias, D., Diaz, I. (2006). Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. J. Oral. Impl., 64–67.
Odont, P. P., Odont, R. B., Odont, J. T., Pesquera, A., Odont, J. L., Nishimura, R., Nasr, H. (1997). Countertorque testing and histomorphometric analysis of various implant surfaces in canines: a pilot study. Implant Dentistry, 6 (4), 259–265. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199700640-00002
Brett, P. M., Harle, J., Salih, V., Mihoc, R., Olsen, J., Jones, F. H. et al. (2004). Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone, 3 5(1), 124–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.009
Kieswetter, R., Schwartz, Z., Hummert, T. W., Cochran, D. L., Simpson, J., Dean, D. D., Boyan, B. D. (1996). Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteolast-like MG-63 cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 32 (1), 55–63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199609)32:1<55::aid-jbm7>3.0.co;2-o
Cooper, L. F. (2000). A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 84 (5), 522–534. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.111966
Wennerberg, A., Hallgren, C., Johansson, C., Danelli, S. (1998). A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res, 9 (1), 11–19. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090102.x
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Лев Ильич Винников, Филипп Захарович Савранский, Роман Вячеславович Симахов, Петр Олегович Гришин 2015
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
