HARMONIZATION PROBLEM OF USED METHODS REGARDING THE COMPLEXITY OF THE RESEARCH
Keywords:
method, theory, system, self-organization, semantic spaceAbstract
Purpose: systematization of modern scientific ideas on the harmonization problem of methods used in relation to the complexity of the research.Material and methods: analysis of literary sources, archival materials, methods of historicism, analogies and similarities.
Results: the works and theories of scientists from different fields of scientific knowledge are analyzed, which established the general principles of self-organization of developing systems and are the basis for the construction of special semantic feature spaces. This gave a fundamentally new method of research that provides the necessary level of solution to many practical problems, which was not achieved by methods previously used.
Conclusions: each level of organization of scientific research needs adequate methods that have the necessary level of solving the tasks in scientific works. In the arsenal of used methods are widely used methods of analysis of results, presented in the form of verbal descriptions, tables, graphs, figures, video recording and analytical description of the obtained patterns. Based on the conventional concept, the validity of which is confirmed by the general theory of self-organization of developing systems and economically sound principles of invariance of the laws of self-organization that they are equally acceptable in inanimate and living systems from biology, anthropology, pedagogy, psychology, including as well as social systems, which has significantly expanded the possibilities of scientific research in these fields of knowledge.
References
Azhippo, A. Yu, Pugach, Ya. I., Pyatisotskaya, S .S., Zhernovnikova, Ya. V., Druz, V. A. (2015), Ontologiya teorii postroeniya kontrolya i otsenki urovnya fizicheskogo razvitiya i fizicheskogo sostoyaniya [Ontology of the theory of constructing control and assessing the level of physical development and physical condition], Harkov: HGAFK; 192 p. (in Russ.).
Anohin, K. P. (1974), Obschaya teoriya funktsionalnyih sistem organizma [General theory of the functional systems of the body], Moskva, pp. 52 – 110. (in Russ.).
Ashanin, V. S., Pugach, Ya. I. (2014), Postroenie semanticheskih prostranstv dlya opisaniya psihosomaticheskoy deyatelnosti cheloveka v ekstremalnyih usloviyah [The construction of semantic spaces to describe the psychosomatic activity of a person in extreme conditions]: uchebnoe posobie, Harkov: HDAFK, 88 p. (in Russ.).
Balk, M. B., Boltyanskiy, V. G. (1987), Geometriya mass [Mass geometry], Moskva: Nauka, 160 p. (in Russ.).
Behterer, V. M. (1991), Ob'ektivnaya psihologiya. Pamyatniki psihologicheskoy myisli [Objective Psychology. Monuments of psychological thought]. Moskva: Nauka, 478 p. (in Russ.).
Breytman, M. Ya. (1949), Klinicheskaya semiotika i differentsialnaya diagnostika endokrinnyih zabolevaniy [Clinical semiotics and differential diagnosis of endocrine diseases], Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo meditsinskoy literaturyi, Leningradskoe otdelenie, 636 p. (in Russ.).
Gegel, G. W. F. (1975), Nauka logiki: sochineniya [The Science of Logic: Works], Tom 1, Moskva: Myisl, 454 p. (in Russ.).
Zhofrua-Sent-Iler (1836), Obschaya i chastnaya istoriya anatomii teloslozheniy [General and private history of body anatomy], Parizh. (in Russ.).
Zade, L. A. (1974), Osnovyi novogo podhoda k analizu slozhnyih sistem protsessov prinyatiya resheniy. Matematika segodnya. [The foundations of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems of decision-making processes. Math today] Moskva: Znanie, pp. 5–49. (in Russ.).
Ilenkov, E. V. (1968), Problema abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v svete «Kapitala» Marksa. Filosofiya i sovremennost [The problem of the abstract and the concrete in the light of Marx's “Capital”. Philosophy and Modernity,], Moskva, pp. 186–213. (in Russ.).
Kant, I. (1966), Kritika sposobnosti myishleniya. Sochineniya [Critique of the ability of thinking. Compositions], T.5. Moskva: Nauka, pp. 238 – 239. (in Russ.).
Kant, I. (2017), Kritika chistogo razuma [A Critique of Pure Reason], per. s nem. i predisl. N. Losskogo. Sankt-Peterburg: Azbuka-Attikus, 766 p. (in Russ.).
Ketle, A. (1911), Sotsialnaya fizika [Social Physics], Sankt-Peterburg, 241 p. (in Russ.).
Ponomarev, Ya. A. (1976), Psihologiya tvorchestva. Akademiya nauk SSSR. Institut psihologii [Psychology of creativity. USSR Academy of Sciences], Moskva: Nauka, 302 p. (in Russ.).
Puankare, A. (1983), O nauke [On Science]. Moskva: Nauka, 260 p. (in Russ.).
Pugach, Ya. I. (2013), "Fundamentals of constructing a semantic space for an orderly presentation of research results", «B'deschego v'prosi ot sveta naukata»: materialyi IX Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, Sofiya: Byal Grad-BG, Tom 39, pp. 13–15. (in Russ.).
Uhtomskiy, A. A. (1966), Fiziologiya cheloveka [Human physiology] / pod red. EB. Babskego. Moskva: Meditsina, pp. 23 – 656. (in Russ.).
Haken, G. (1985), Sinergetika ierarhii neustoychivostey v samoorganizuyuschihsya sistemah i ustroystvah [Synergetics of the hierarchy of instabilities in self-organizing systems and devices], Moskva: Mir, 423 p. (in Russ.).
Hramko, Yu. A., Bernal Dzhon Desmond (1983), Fiziki: bibliograficheskiy spravochnik [Physicists: bibliographic reference] / pod red. AI. Ahiezera. Izd. 2-e ispr. i dopoln., Moskva: Nauka, p. 29. (in Russ.).
Bertalanffy, L. (1969), General system theory. New York, 289 p. (in Eng).
Galton, F. (1989), Natural inheritance. London: Macmillan, 266 p. (in Eng).
William H. Sheldon (1940), The varieties of human physique: An introduction to constitutional psychology? New York: Harper & Brothers. (in Eng).
Zadeh, L. A. (1965), Fuzzy sets. Information & Control, Vol. 12, pp. 94-102. (in Eng).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Slobozhanskyi herald of science and sport
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our publications use CREATIVE COMMONS open access copyrighted magazines.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following conditions:
1 Authors reserve the copyright of the work and transfer to the journal the right to first publish this work, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of this journal.
2 Authors have the right to conclude separate agreements for additional non-exclusive distribution of the work in the video material in which it was published in the journal (for example, in the workplace, in electronic storage or published as part of a monograph), provided that the link is before the first publication of this magazine
