Experience of the Lithuanian republic and the republic of Georgia on the provision of public services and the ways of their implementation in the domestic legislation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.127421

Keywords:

"single window", "single office", electronic access, implementation, service, public service

Abstract

The article highlights the foreign experience of Lithuania and Georgia in providing public services and ways of its implementation in domestic legislation. The legal acts regulating the provision of public services in Lithuania, Georgia are disclosed. The directions of improvement of the legislation of Ukraine on the provision of public services in the light of foreign experience are offered, namely: round-the-clock convenient access for all users, especially those with disabilities or those who work or study abroad, while maintaining confidentiality; the use of various remote communication channels, which in turn leads to a reduction in the cost of such a service and to accelerates the timing of provision of various types of public services to consumers and, as a result, to improve the environmental situation (reducing emissions, paper costs, etc.); provision of public services in one place ("single office", "one window", etc.), which allows to fully satisfy the needs of consumers

Author Biography

Yevgeny Leheza, University of Customs and Finance Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

Doctor of Law, Associate ProfessorDepartment of Administrative and Customs Law

References

  1. Bukhanevych, O. M. (2016). Teoretyko-pravovi ta prakseolohichni zasady nadannia administratyvnykh posluh v Ukraini. Kyiv, 455.
  2. Leheza, Ye. O. (2017). Kontseptsiya publichnykh posluh: administratyvno-pravovyi aspekt. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU, 511.
  3. Ob utverzhdenii Strategicheskoy programmy tekhnologicheskoy modernizatsii upravleniya (elektronnoe preobrazovanie) (2011). Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Respubliki Moldova ot 20 sent 2011. g. № 710. Monitorul Oficial № 156-159. St. 780.
  4. Vasylieva, N. V. (2013). Orhanizatsiia nadannia administratyvnykh posluh pidpryiemtsiam Hruzii: dosvid dlia Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk Akademii munitsypalnoho upravlinnia, 3, 83–89.
  5. Leshhenko, L. V. (Ed.) (2012). Borba s korruptsiey v sfere gosudarstvennykh uslug: khronika reform v Gruzii. Washington: The World Bank, 108. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGEORGIA/Resources/Georgia_Book_Russian.pdf
  6. Gruziya: otchet o prodelannoy rabote (2011). Stambul'skiy plan deystviy po bor'be s korruptsiey, Vtoroy raund monitoringa. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/corruption/acn/48807361.pdf
  7. Vasylieva, N. V. (2013). Instrumenty reformuvannia systemy nadannia derzhavnykh i munitsypalnykh posluh v Bilorusi ta Moldovi. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, 10. Available at: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=640
  8. Portal latviyskykh derzhavnykh i munitsypalnykh posluh. Available at: https://www.latvija.lv/
  9. Kishonas, V. Razvitie elektronnoy infrastruktury i elektronnyh uslug v Litve: vklad publichnogo sektora. Available at: http://www.myshared.ru/slide/220630/
  10. Averianov, V. B. (Ed.) (2002). Vykonavcha vlada i administratyvne pravo. Kyiv: Vydav. dim InIure, 668.

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Leheza, Y. (2018). Experience of the Lithuanian republic and the republic of Georgia on the provision of public services and the ways of their implementation in the domestic legislation. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1 (3), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.127421

Issue

Section

Juridical Science