The methods of increasing quality and efficiency of influence of civil society institutions on the normal projecting of government authorities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.149740

Keywords:

normative design, legal monitoring, draft law, legislative act, civil society institutes, democracy

Abstract

Importance is the definition of socially important tasks of social development, the solution of which should be oriented legal monitoring. According to the results of sociological surveys, a wide range of tasks can be identified such as: increasing the efficiency of the legal system and public administration; the development of a mechanism for feedback between public authorities, local self-government and citizens, the implementation of the constitutional duty of the state to respect and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, etc.

At this stage, it is necessary to keep an account of all factors that have a positive effect on the development of rule-making. Advantage is given to the establishment of a system of independent expertise and consideration of public opinion. An example of the involvement of public associations and academic institutions is the work of international associations that monitor the observance of human rights. The absence of normative regulation in Ukraine of the issues of conducting state and public examination of the current legislative acts and draft normative legal acts is a problem that negatively affects the effectiveness of monitoring. In order to ensure that public opinion is taken into account when conducting a legal examination, it is necessary to improve the procedures for conducting public examinations. Legislation and enforcement monitoring is an instrument for the formation of a civil society, a form of dialogue between society and government.

The inclusion of civil society institutes in the process of legal monitoring optimizes the analysis, comparison and evaluation of the quality of legislation, enforcement through the prism of public needs and aspirations of civil society. Thus, it is possible to organize the interaction of institutes of state power and civil society in order to identify corruption factors and shortcomings of legislation on the basis of voluntary and independent participation in this activity.

The results of legal monitoring received as a result of the involvement of public associations and scientific institutions should become the basis for making changes to the work of state authorities, legislatures during strategic planning and identifying the priority directions of the country's development

Author Biography

Ihor Onyshchuk, Precarpathian Faculty of the National Academy of Internal Affairs Natsionalnoi Hvardii str., 3, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76005

Doctor of the Science of Law, Professor

Department of Social and Humanitarian Sciences

References

  1. Rabinovych, P. M.; Shemshuchenko, Iu. S. et. al. (Eds.) (1999). Efektyvnist prava. Yurydychna entsyklopediia. Vol. 2 [The effectiveness of law. Legal Encyclopedia]. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia, 369–370.
  2. Onishhenko, N. M. (2007). Problema efektyvnosti zakonodavstva ta suchasnyi rozvytok [The problem of the effectiveness of legislation and modern development]. Viche, 12, 3–6.
  3. Kabyshev, S. V. (Ed.) (2006). Zakonotvorchestvo v Kanade [Lawmaking in Canada]. Moscow: Formula prava, 272.
  4. Derzhavna polityka rozvytku gromadians'kogo suspil'stva: monitoryng efektyvnosti. Evropeis'kyi dosvid [State policy of civil society development: monitoring of efficiency. European experience] (2011). Kyiv: PROON, 97.
  5. Zakonotvorchist' v Ukrai'ni [Legislation in Ukraine] (2015). Kyiv: In-t zakonod. VRU, 334.
  6. Korupciini ryzyky u zakonotvorchosti Ukrai'ny: monitoryng ta perspektyvy podolannia [Corruption risks in lawmaking of Ukraine: monitoring and prospects of overcoming] (2015). Kyiv: In-t zakonod. VRU, 283.
  7. Zaichuk, V. O. (Ed.) (2016). Monitoryng kolizii i progalyn u zakonodavstvi Ukrai'ny [Monitoring of conflicts and gaps in the legislation of Ukraine]. Kyiv: In-t zakonod. VRU, 178.
  8. Mordasova, T. A.; Morozovaia, E. V. (Ed.) (2011). Obshhestvennoe uchastye v polytycheskom upravlenii: institucyonal'naia sreda i ocenka effektyvnosty [Public participation in political governance: institutional environment and performance evaluation]. Astrahan: Astrahanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, Izdatel'skii dom «Astrahanskii universitet», 185.
  9. Varkova, S. A. (2013). Monitoring zakonodatel'stva i pravopriminitel'noi praktiki: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie [Monitoring Legislation and Law Enforcement Practice: Theoretical and Legal Research]. Moscow, 22.
  10. Kopiсska, G., Wojciechowska-Nowak, A., Kuzma, G., Krzyzanowska, D. (2008). Raport z realizacji projektu «Monitoring procesu stanowienia prawa w 2007 roku». Warszawa, 26.
  11. Pro zabezpechennia uchasti hromadskosti u formuvanni ta realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky [On ensuring public participation in the formation and implementation of state policy] (2010). Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrai'ny No. 996. 03.11.2010. Available at: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-2010-%D0%BF
  12. Vzaiemodiia organiv derzhavnoi' vlady z instytutamy gromadianskogo suspilstva [Interaction of public authorities with civil society institutes] (2013). Available at: http://tercentrtcyr.ks.ua/news/34-vzayemodya-organv-derzhavnoyi-vladi-z-institutami-gromadyanskogo-susplstva.html
  13. Ob osnovah obshhestvennogo kontrolia v Rossiiskoi Federacii [On the Basis of Public Control in the Russian Federation] (2014). Federalnyy zakon No. 212-FZ. 21.07.2014. URL: storage.esp.tomsk.gov.ru/files/27916/zakon.pdf‎‎
  14. Artemenko, V. (Ed.) (2007). Formy ta metody zaluchennia gromads'kosti [Forms and methods of public engagement]. Kyiv: IKC «Lesta», 240.
  15. Matviichuk, A. V. (2008). Osnovni sposoby vzajemodii' gromads'kyh organizacii iz derzhavoiu. Suchasna ukrainska polityka: Polityky i politology pro nei, 13, 213–223.
  16. Pro informatsiiu (1992). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2657-XII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 48, 650. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2657-12
  17. Pro poriadok vysvitlennia diialnosti orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady ta orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini zasobamy masovoi informatsii (1997). Zakon Ukrainy No. 539/97-VR. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 49, 299. Available at: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/539/97-%D0%B2%D1%80
  18. Latvia. Parliament of Latvia (2006). Declaration about the Development of a Civil Society in Latvia and Co-operation with non-governmental organizations. Riga.
  19. Inter-Parliamentary Union (2009). Guidelines for Parliamentary Websites. Available at: https://www.ipu.org/file/576/download?token=4IPqc0cC
  20. Vysnovky za rezultatamy provedennia Monitorynhu stanu nezalezhnosti suddiv v Ukraini – 2012, yoho obhovorennia na «kruhlomu stoli» ta na zasidanni Rady suddiv Ukrainy. Available at: https://court.gov.ua/
  21. Declaration of Global Principles for Non-partisan Election Observation and Monitoring by Citizen Organizations (DoGP) And Code of Conduct for Non-partisan Citizen Election Observers and Monitors Commemorated. Global Network of Domestic Election Monitors (GNDEM) (2012). New York: United Nations, 37.
  22. Initsiatyva, partnerstvo, vidkrytyi uriad. Hromadska otsinka pershoho roku vprovadzhennia (2013). Available at: http://ogp.gov.ua/sites/default/files/monitoring/First%20year_cs_19_07_2013.pdf

Downloads

Published

2018-12-26

How to Cite

Onyshchuk, I. (2018). The methods of increasing quality and efficiency of influence of civil society institutions on the normal projecting of government authorities. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (4 (6), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2018.149740

Issue

No. 4 (6) (2018)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Ihor Onyshchuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.